HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| paradogta
paradogta
[33488009]
[]
# Statistics
Favourites: 365; Deviations: 20; Watchers: 1012
Watching: 82; Pageviews: 152862; Comments Made: 631; Friends: 82
# Comments
Comments: 177
Congrats, I just realized you are about to hit 100 deviations, hope that you might do something special, but you don't have to, we will be waiting for more.
π: 0 β©: 0
Your lego models look very nice. I think you could be a good art designer for lego games.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hey, how have been, got anything new for us, soon?
π: 0 β©: 1
no, unfortunately not
π: 0 β©: 1
OK, been busy with other things, I guess. Note me when planning to post again.
π: 0 β©: 1
Got anything for us, its been a while, but if you can't, we can wait. Danny hopefully, but anything else is find by me.
π: 0 β©: 1
Don't worry, I haven't forgottenΒ you
π: 0 β©: 1
OK, whenever you can post, is fine by me, Glad to see Danny grow or anything that you have for us.
π: 0 β©: 0
Greetings Im rikubattle. Your drawings are really nice and I like many show series like The Simpsons, Phineas and Ferb, South Park etc...
Do you take requests?
Nice to meet you
π: 0 β©: 1
Your welcome
Do you take requests?
π: 0 β©: 1
That depends on what you want.
π: 0 β©: 1
What the fuck? Why are you drawing underage characters as body builders? That's fucking sick and disgusting.
π: 0 β©: 1
I apologize for that.
π: 0 β©: 1
You honestly need psychological help. Are you some kind of pedophile?
π: 0 β©: 1
No, it's strange but I just like to draw it, I am not standing on the characters
π: 0 β©: 2
Dont listen to him he likes to see anime porn so xD
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, muscle growth with characters is fine as long, as in my mind they are older and appropriately clothed. And the faves he has are women sexualized, so I think could be worse.
π: 0 β©: 0
Well still they are underage characters.
π: 0 β©: 1
What's your problem?
π: 0 β©: 1
Again. What's your problem?
π: 0 β©: 1
well .. i dont know what side to choose.
π: 0 β©: 1
What do you mean? Choose the side that doesn't involve being a pedo.
π: 0 β©: 0
What happened to that Jake image that was just up?
π: 0 β©: 1
I was wondering the same thing.
π: 0 β©: 1
And now the Dipper and Robbie one is gone too! What is going on?...
π: 0 β©: 1
Maybe DA removed them, as the staff thought they was too sexual, I have art taken because of that.
π: 0 β©: 1
I could almost see that for the Dipper and Robbie one, but the Jake one is covered up. Though if that was the case, the Bloo ones should've been taken down too then, right?
π: 0 β©: 2
He told me in pm that they did not conform with DA's rules, so the staff took it down, but I am not sure why they did took down Jake, as he was covered.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah. This is why you should have a backup avenue for when you skirt the line. I think this is why most artists in this area do, because this is so risque. Too bad we won't be able to see them unless he edits them or whatever he needs to do though, they looked really good.
π: 0 β©: 1
I always have a backup, but I have seen some art on here that is a whole lot worse, and it has not been removed despite it goes against the rules. Not sure why that happens, I think the Jake image didn't, seem to be inappropriate to me, but it just my opinion.
π: 0 β©: 1
DeviantArt is finicky I guess. The Jake image looked fine to me.
π: 0 β©: 1
I think that DA staff is just removing what they find offensive, even if it's not that bad or inappropriate, trust me,I have seen artwork, that should been removed a long time ago. Same, the image didn't offend me, though it did offend someone on staff likely.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, point taken, maybe he was not happy with them and took them down himself.
π: 0 β©: 1
I might be able to find something to help find those files.
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>