plmoknplmoknq In reply to ??? [2009-12-12 19:55:17 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome man. Quality work, so it's my pleasure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StudioRamynke In reply to ??? [2009-11-21 16:43:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the Watch!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

plmoknplmoknq In reply to StudioRamynke [2009-11-21 16:45:43 +0000 UTC]

Welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AlexandraB24 In reply to ??? [2009-11-13 16:49:02 +0000 UTC]

Hi
I meant to reply to you on Talkingdrum's page wherfe you asked whether Contours works better because the model has shaved her pubic hair. Fascinating question. It seems to be a convention in art nude that models should shave even though occasionally this makes them look like little girls!But to answer your question more directly have you ever seen Courbet's 'The origin of the world' (a google images search will help you to locate it). Have a look and then tell me what you think

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

plmoknplmoknq In reply to AlexandraB24 [2009-11-16 05:07:54 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I remember studying that painting a while ago. I'm not sure that would work today, oddly it reads kind of vulgar.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlexandraB24 In reply to plmoknplmoknq [2009-11-16 23:32:55 +0000 UTC]

vulgar?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

plmoknplmoknq In reply to AlexandraB24 [2009-11-17 04:01:09 +0000 UTC]

I personally don't feel it's vulgar. I'm saying if someone translated that exact pose into a portrait today, many many would make the claim of vulgarity. People are narrow minded, don't forget.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mickwag In reply to ??? [2009-11-03 18:00:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the watch.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

plmoknplmoknq In reply to mickwag [2009-11-04 01:05:11 +0000 UTC]

Welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LeJournalDAmelie In reply to ??? [2009-10-10 10:50:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for add

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sacha9 In reply to ??? [2009-10-01 13:39:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the watch!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

plmoknplmoknq In reply to sacha9 [2009-10-02 23:06:04 +0000 UTC]

no problem I really like your work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

davehare In reply to ??? [2009-09-24 14:52:23 +0000 UTC]

Hi,
Thanks for the .
Much appreciated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0