HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| deviot
# Statistics
Favourites: 65; Deviations: 0; Watchers: 124
Watching: 148; Pageviews: 67820; Comments Made: 3289; Friends: 148
# Comments
Comments: 1021
daftpunk In reply to ??? [2005-10-06 16:39:06 +0000 UTC]
OK, youre back... now why the hell is your journal missing? o_o and whats with the "censorship" deal? Is this a statement or did they remove it themselves?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadCheshire In reply to daftpunk [2005-10-07 06:43:08 +0000 UTC]
the censorship? probably to show what the staff wants. there's been a numerous amount of unecessary bans
i got banned for using the word "theif". he got banned for using the word "lust"
sad, no?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
daftpunk In reply to MadCheshire [2005-10-07 14:06:22 +0000 UTC]
Well their rules state you cant publicly accuse someone of being a thief and such. I found that out the hard way, but that was when Jark was still around so I didnt get banned, only warned.
Still all he was saying is Josh was distracted by his "lust" or his -obsessions-. Which is true for most guys I know at least. I think a few scientific studies showed that over half out waking hours guys are thinking about sex even inbetween thoughts. Someone could say that I'm distracted by my Lust for hot, game playing, artistic, music loving, women, and they'd be right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadCheshire In reply to daftpunk [2005-10-07 22:58:59 +0000 UTC]
hmmm so you cant accuse someone of theivery in public. thats just weird. shalll we people just send a note saying OMFG YOU THEIF WTF BBQ!~
ah lust, eh?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
daftpunk In reply to MadCheshire [2005-10-08 06:01:49 +0000 UTC]
actualy I think they dont realy want you CONTACTING that person in general.
From my personal experiences here's why:
#3 - They would try to get you banned for harrassment
#2 - Theyll just lie anyway
#1 - They'll take down the image, it will take an admin so long to reply that the image would have been flushed out of the system after a month of waiting.
In my case, The image got removed, The Notifiy ticket never got sent because DA was deciding that it would -pretend- to send messages and the like when it never did. So the thief I confronted got away with it, and he also got away with insulting the person he ripped off then nearly getting me banned for harrassment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MadCheshire In reply to daftpunk [2005-10-08 06:35:13 +0000 UTC]
is it me, or is da's system getting EXTREMELY faulty?
and i do see some propaganda techniques being used once in awhile
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
deviot In reply to bren [2005-09-20 13:41:23 +0000 UTC]
yea, saw that... quite the crux if you ask me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bren In reply to deviot [2005-09-20 17:09:58 +0000 UTC]
weird
(surprised jmills isn't up there too)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
artofcarmen [2005-09-16 15:19:26 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the friend, and thank you for a laugh. I was having a bad day, but it's a little better now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kargath64 [2005-09-12 00:16:13 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the watch, mate.
I'm guessing you're the one who passed it on to Jark?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
duhcoolies [2005-09-10 10:43:56 +0000 UTC]
thnx so much for the fave on Ways to Support $jark
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Raichana [2005-09-10 01:06:38 +0000 UTC]
thanks for the fav... there obviously still a lot who very much so support the yellow alien ^^ thats good
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
neo-tek [2005-09-09 17:10:20 +0000 UTC]
thank you so much for the , i wish there was more i could do!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fuhk In reply to deviot [2005-09-10 08:46:27 +0000 UTC]
It's a shame to see something that Scott has worked on so hard and so much on, could and was ripped from him so easily. This is still a sad time for dA.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
deviot In reply to fuhk [2005-09-10 10:18:58 +0000 UTC]
quite a shame, you're right. too bad more deviants don't see it that way...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
fuhk In reply to deviot [2005-09-10 11:01:28 +0000 UTC]
It's because Scott was a 'behind the scenes' figure. He never really went around to deviants pages and commented etc. While attemps have been made to show the deviants that 'jark' has worked his ass off behind the scenes for the community, many deviants just don't care. As long as the site runs, they're ok with however is in charge.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
deviot In reply to fuhk [2005-09-10 23:26:49 +0000 UTC]
actually, in reverse, he did do quite a bit of commenting --> "Deviation Comments: 10,293"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fuhk In reply to deviot [2005-09-11 08:55:44 +0000 UTC]
Seriously?! Whoa! I'll eat my words.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
deviot In reply to fuhk [2005-09-11 11:43:54 +0000 UTC]
hehehheh, yes, like seriously y0. ...psst... no eating shit on my userpage
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fuhk In reply to deviot [2005-09-11 13:42:47 +0000 UTC]
Well, whatever. All in all, Jarks the man!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Motje In reply to deviot [2005-09-10 10:45:31 +0000 UTC]
The rest is now like ow we love Lolly (which I do too, not a prob) and celebrated Yellow Day and after that it didn't matter anymore.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>