HOME | DD

0laffson β€” ''Daily'' sketch - ''Hello, Human.''

#candle #cat #cheetah #doodle #feline #female #girl #sketch #almostnaked #anthro #anthrofurry #blackandwhite #dailysketch #kingcheetah #nobackground #seductive #seductivefemale
Published: 2017-03-25 01:42:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 3877; Favourites: 185; Downloads: 66
Redirect to original
Description She has a thing for humans. And "head-fur" too.Β 


A semi lewd drawing that was kinda improvised. I didn't really have this in mind, but as the drawing progressed it was just begging to become something "seductive", so here it is Β  Also, strategic coverings FTW!
Related content
Comments: 149

0laffson In reply to ??? [2017-03-28 00:39:06 +0000 UTC]

Yep!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sevian In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 15:18:31 +0000 UTC]

Haha... "Mind if I blow out the candle? I promise... No strings attached.."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to Sevian [2017-03-28 00:39:00 +0000 UTC]

hahahahah!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DarkstripeShadowpaw [2017-03-25 14:49:50 +0000 UTC]

I would have thought that felines would find human male equipment rather lacking in key features that their own males have...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

JackofAllAss In reply to DarkstripeShadowpaw [2017-03-28 21:55:38 +0000 UTC]

I reckon some human dude could tie a brush to his johnson.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

0laffson In reply to DarkstripeShadowpaw [2017-03-28 00:38:45 +0000 UTC]

haha probably! XD Maybe she has no problems with it though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DJcroc2016 [2017-03-25 12:08:40 +0000 UTC]

Does she like how long the 'head fur' gets?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to DJcroc2016 [2017-03-28 00:38:23 +0000 UTC]

She does, and she loves it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DJcroc2016 In reply to 0laffson [2017-03-28 16:48:44 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S7alker117 In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 11:46:24 +0000 UTC]

She's lovely. Good job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to S7alker117 [2017-03-28 00:38:14 +0000 UTC]

Thank you a lot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S7alker117 In reply to 0laffson [2017-03-29 10:10:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SE-Roger In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 11:24:25 +0000 UTC]

out of curiosity,
is it posible for humans and, this kasheat looking race, to bread?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

0laffson In reply to SE-Roger [2017-03-28 00:36:55 +0000 UTC]

Nope! Different species can't have any offspring, unless they are genetically close enough to make an hybrid (and this isn't the case).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SE-Roger In reply to 0laffson [2017-03-28 01:46:33 +0000 UTC]

ok.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S7alker117 In reply to SE-Roger [2017-03-25 11:48:29 +0000 UTC]

I'd say they may both be able to eat bread *sorry for the pun, couldn't help myself*. Breeding, though, would be weird - both species are too different. Cats and dogs cannot breed for the same reason.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SE-Roger In reply to S7alker117 [2017-03-25 11:50:04 +0000 UTC]

true-
tho it's not that uncommon in fanticy and sifi settings.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S7alker117 In reply to SE-Roger [2017-03-25 17:38:46 +0000 UTC]

True. I do find that quite off-putting. I mean, regarding humans, if there were ancient human space colonies that were abandoned and people evolved into a new direction, or genetically engineered humanforms were contemplated I could buy it, but between different species... it is something that may make me lose my interest in a setting due to my scientificΒ mind.Β 

Then again, unfortunately quite common in fiction...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

0laffson In reply to S7alker117 [2017-03-28 00:38:05 +0000 UTC]

I totally agree with you here, which is why different species can't breed here, unless they are genetically close. Β  Maybe humans and dwarves can have hybrids, but that is as far as I'll get.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S7alker117 In reply to 0laffson [2017-04-02 12:13:33 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, when the species are somewhat closely related, hominids for example, I can see it happen, under some circumstances. But beyond that it kind of breaks my suspension of disbelief, and fantasy rooted in some science, at least for the world building, is something that would sound kinda fresh atm.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to S7alker117 [2017-04-05 00:23:20 +0000 UTC]

I totally agree! I'm fine with fantasy, but it needs to be consistent and somewhat believable for me to get into it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S7alker117 In reply to 0laffson [2017-04-06 00:27:40 +0000 UTC]

Indeed. At the least self-consistency is a plus (unless the lack of it becomes a plot point, which can be kinda cool if well-done). Believability makes everything that much better, allows you to really immerseΒ yourself.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Backonninja In reply to S7alker117 [2017-03-27 07:44:18 +0000 UTC]

Scientific mind aside though, a good story is still a good story.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S7alker117 In reply to Backonninja [2017-03-27 18:27:26 +0000 UTC]

I'll agree with that. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SE-Roger In reply to S7alker117 [2017-03-25 18:20:40 +0000 UTC]

Very true

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KimericalArtworks In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 10:47:00 +0000 UTC]

I think this far she has become a running joke already, she deserves a name at least XD
Also great work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

0laffson In reply to KimericalArtworks [2017-03-28 00:34:23 +0000 UTC]

True! I'll have to think about something!

Thanks! ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KimericalArtworks In reply to 0laffson [2017-03-28 16:05:41 +0000 UTC]

No, thank you for the fun times XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MrGheesfellow In reply to KimericalArtworks [2017-03-25 12:55:27 +0000 UTC]

Ditto

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hardwing In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 10:02:40 +0000 UTC]

Lovely!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to Hardwing [2017-03-28 00:34:06 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Naruto1990 [2017-03-25 09:15:07 +0000 UTC]

Strategic coverings... lolΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to Naruto1990 [2017-03-28 00:34:00 +0000 UTC]

haha indeed! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SuperiorArtWarrior In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 09:12:04 +0000 UTC]

Lovely.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to SuperiorArtWarrior [2017-03-28 00:33:51 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DagoOtter In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 08:50:43 +0000 UTC]

Uuuuu.... Emmm.... O///O ... Ekhem I'msorryImustmistakedoorsindark hehe Goodnight *Fast with shame close door *

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to DagoOtter [2017-03-28 00:31:23 +0000 UTC]

Don't worry, it's the right door...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DagoOtter In reply to 0laffson [2017-03-28 00:36:25 +0000 UTC]

Uuuuu ^///^ ^///^ Emmm... So can I... *Dago need undress his armament, because There is save and warm inn and... *Huh* ...And Strangely, these trousers and armor became strangely tight ^///^ ...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to DagoOtter [2017-03-28 00:43:33 +0000 UTC]

hahaha right! XDΒ  Have fun

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DagoOtter In reply to 0laffson [2017-03-28 00:44:09 +0000 UTC]

Huehuehue ^///^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SHARK-008 In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 07:06:50 +0000 UTC]

Damn strategic coverings ( joke )!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to SHARK-008 [2017-03-28 00:31:08 +0000 UTC]

haha I must think of the children! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SHARK-008 In reply to 0laffson [2017-03-28 03:37:11 +0000 UTC]

Children come on DA!?! Gasp! ( say the guy who put his less explicit art on DA ( except 1-2 images ) and more explicit on FA. because well, it's FA, if children come here, wtf they do here XD XD XD)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Swaroopashok In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 06:29:44 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful work. Keep up the creative streak. Do take a look at my art and lemme know what you think. Would love to get your opinion.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to Swaroopashok [2017-03-28 00:30:43 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much! Β Β  Your works are absolutely gorgeous! I'm surprised you don't have more watchers, honestly!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

21Mauricio21 In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 04:37:46 +0000 UTC]

Nnnnnice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

0laffson In reply to 21Mauricio21 [2017-03-28 00:29:11 +0000 UTC]

hahaha indeed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Raymond-Todd In reply to ??? [2017-03-25 04:20:36 +0000 UTC]

0laffson.deviantart.com/art/Da…
Try number threeΒ Β 

P. S.
By the way, she still does not have a name.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

0laffson In reply to Raymond-Todd [2017-03-28 00:29:03 +0000 UTC]

As Milokov said, 4th XDΒ 

Right! D: I'll have to think about it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

milokov In reply to Raymond-Todd [2017-03-25 05:31:26 +0000 UTC]

This would be the 4th time actually
That we know of XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>