HOME | DD

8BitLola — Unbuttoned

Published: 2016-03-12 23:04:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 77904; Favourites: 2488; Downloads: 3296
Redirect to original
Description  twitter.com/8BitLola
 8bitlola.tumblr.com
 instagram.com/8BitLola
Related content
Comments: 224

MizuNeko68 In reply to ??? [2017-12-26 06:23:49 +0000 UTC]

The issue with that mature content thing is that many people don't mark their posts as mature.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Carminis66 In reply to MizuNeko68 [2018-02-03 12:59:53 +0000 UTC]

What about this is mature? No genitals, no violence, no harm or drugs.
I tell you whats wrong: Your mind is sexually loaded, and you project it now on the picture,
thus, call it mature content. No your interpretation is mature, and even this is doubtable.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MizuNeko68 In reply to Carminis66 [2018-02-03 19:09:17 +0000 UTC]

Mate you should be replying to TillableFrog, I wasn't talking about this image specifically, I was talking about the issue with the mature content filter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Carminis66 In reply to MizuNeko68 [2018-02-04 00:24:51 +0000 UTC]

I assumed something wrong. Im sry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Freimgul In reply to MizuNeko68 [2018-02-02 05:59:21 +0000 UTC]

This is not mature content tho. Age minimum here is 13+. That age should be able to handle mild erotica

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kh0nAn In reply to ??? [2017-12-19 13:10:24 +0000 UTC]

This picture inappropriate and absolutely disgusting ? Overreacting much ?

This one is pretty much artistic if you look at the picture composition and lighting. Also, it's not just a shitty nude as you can find elsewhere on this website, so why are you vomiting all that mindless hate ? Your stupidity is the thing that actually make me question what's happening to humanity to be honest.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FireBlade33 In reply to ??? [2017-12-19 11:43:08 +0000 UTC]

Well I think you could argue that this picture should be tagged as mature, but a lot of artists have used nudity in paintings before photography was invented and before you were even born.
If you dont like images that depict humans which are only partly dressed or naked, that's one thing.
Telling a photographer she is a disgrace to art and everyone that looks at her pictures is a pervert, is a bit harsh.

Maybe writing a friendly note that requests these images to be tagged as mature does more than an insult below one of these pictures.
At least I tend to react in a more understanding way if a message adressed to me wouldn't contain the phrases "inapropriate shit", "disgusting", "perverts", "you're a disgrace to art" and "you should get away from here".

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nasooto In reply to ??? [2017-12-19 11:20:26 +0000 UTC]

Some people believe that ones bodyshape is a piece of art. If someone wants to somehow express themself through their body, that's something to respect. I however agree that there's a lot of nudity on this website, but at the same time there are settings to turn mature content off.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Freimgul In reply to Nasooto [2018-02-02 05:57:43 +0000 UTC]

Nudity was always part of deviantart as it is a very common theme in art since the stone age. Certain kinds of nudity where not censored before but we are going ever more prudeish in recent years.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RedblakMonster In reply to ??? [2017-12-18 17:23:34 +0000 UTC]

¡So pretty!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WarLordEra In reply to ??? [2017-12-18 05:47:46 +0000 UTC]

You need to learn to use the "mature tag".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Codes-And-Customs In reply to WarLordEra [2017-12-18 06:33:36 +0000 UTC]

The reason the "mature" filter has not been featured on this piece of photography would mostly be due to the fact that the person depicted is not considered "publicly indecent".
They are clothed to an acceptable extent. This artwork does not feature nudity, and while it is revealing, would not require a "mature" filter.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

WarLordEra In reply to Codes-And-Customs [2017-12-19 03:23:13 +0000 UTC]

I can practically see her pubic area.
And just to the side of the browser where it shows the deviant artist's other works, it's clear they're aiming for that softcore porn look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

matthew-lane In reply to WarLordEra [2017-12-19 06:26:52 +0000 UTC]

"I can practically see her pubic area."

We have a special term for the situation in which you can almost see someones pubic area.... We call it NOT being able to see ones pubic area.

"it's clear they're aiming for that softcore porn look."

LOL softcore porn doesn't have a "look" mate, softcore porn is porn without visible sexual penetration. This is just a photo you are interjecting your own mental bugbears in to. The fact is that there are specific qualifiers for what does and does not require the dA mature content filter & this does not fill any of those criteria.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Carminis66 In reply to matthew-lane [2018-02-04 00:26:45 +0000 UTC]

Bugbears? Wtf. I laughed my ass off. Whats that? xD
Gonna draw that for sure, wth. Nice fugure of speech, english can be amazing sometimes.
(im german, just honestly amazed)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WarLordEra In reply to matthew-lane [2017-12-20 02:47:06 +0000 UTC]

ok, defensive much?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Carminis66 In reply to WarLordEra [2018-02-04 00:33:23 +0000 UTC]

No not at all. You are just too ignorant to understand why your behavior is pointless and agressive,
and now you pull that "you are defensive blabla" card out of your ass to shift the blame and ridicule your opponent.
Its simple like that: If you try to fool a smart guy, better use better material, or you just label yourself even more as the tard you dont avoid to be.
Its a tactic used that much and that undisguised that even prepubescents can
identify it as a weak distraction and unskilled manipulation.

If you wanna "win" without any thoughtful arguments you should reall, really put some efford into the
study of polemic tricks. But i would rather suggest you to grow some brain and elevate your mind, sinstead of arguing about things where you are simply wrong.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kateastr0fic In reply to Codes-And-Customs [2017-12-18 16:58:12 +0000 UTC]

Doesn't it contain sexual themes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Codes-And-Customs In reply to Kateastr0fic [2017-12-19 03:04:50 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't say so. 
The items of clothing worn, whilst very few, are not necessarily provocative in nature.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HawntedDollie In reply to Kateastr0fic [2017-12-18 18:41:59 +0000 UTC]

Only to those who think it. It just states that it is unbuttoned, not whatever you or others imagine it to be. My thoughts are "A slim waist I would like to one day achieve" not whatever you're thinking. So no a mature tag is not needed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ChibiMui In reply to ??? [2017-12-18 02:31:56 +0000 UTC]

How is this art?

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

matthew-lane In reply to ChibiMui [2017-12-19 06:28:51 +0000 UTC]

Art is a diverse range of human activities in creating visual, auditory or performing artifacts (artworks), expressing the author's imaginative or technical skill, intended to be appreciated for their beauty or emotional power

this demonstrates technical skill within a visual medium, hence it is art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WarLordEra In reply to ChibiMui [2017-12-18 05:45:17 +0000 UTC]

This is no art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EmilyWulfStudios In reply to WarLordEra [2017-12-22 02:37:59 +0000 UTC]

You need to re-evaluate your definition of ART. Photography is an artform

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WarLordEra In reply to EmilyWulfStudios [2017-12-22 07:42:16 +0000 UTC]

If that makes you people feel better about what's basically fap material. I mean, I wouldn't mind except for people desperately wanting to remain morally upright about it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EmilyWulfStudios In reply to WarLordEra [2017-12-22 20:35:16 +0000 UTC]

You know, I wanted to remain proper but you're just an asshole looking for attention. Who gives a fuck if people are attracted to this? Oooo this picture is beautiful and dare I fucking say sexy! Who gives a shit! It's fucking 2017-2018 get fucking over yourself!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WarLordEra In reply to EmilyWulfStudios [2017-12-25 23:14:19 +0000 UTC]

Ok. I guess we can both agree it's not art and just something people admire.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EmilyWulfStudios In reply to WarLordEra [2017-12-25 23:23:17 +0000 UTC]

Agree to disagree then I guess

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WarLordEra In reply to EmilyWulfStudios [2017-12-25 23:33:45 +0000 UTC]

Yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LavenderPyon In reply to ChibiMui [2017-12-18 03:22:12 +0000 UTC]

Photography of people

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ChibiMui In reply to LavenderPyon [2017-12-18 03:35:34 +0000 UTC]

Hm, to each there own I guess.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

depress1 In reply to ??? [2017-12-17 23:56:01 +0000 UTC]

you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

atheadax In reply to ??? [2017-12-17 23:33:13 +0000 UTC]

Please put this onto mature content!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

matthew-lane In reply to atheadax [2017-12-19 06:29:51 +0000 UTC]

There is no requirement to put the mature tags on this image, it fills none of the required criteria that would necessitate the mature filter tags.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WarLordEra In reply to atheadax [2017-12-18 05:46:21 +0000 UTC]

So many deviant artists who never put on mature tags. What's the use of having this feature if we're just going to see it anyways because of people like this? smeh

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

atheadax In reply to WarLordEra [2017-12-19 01:14:32 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dave1331 In reply to ??? [2017-12-17 23:25:24 +0000 UTC]

hey lady heeeeey lady your shorts are unbuttoned hey lady!!! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CampingGroundsStudio In reply to ??? [2017-12-16 21:25:51 +0000 UTC]

^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GoldnSunflower In reply to ??? [2017-12-14 16:35:56 +0000 UTC]

That feeling tho..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TimBarklet [2017-12-14 03:48:57 +0000 UTC]

it's been a long time, glad to see you active again

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bearrdaddy [2017-12-13 07:59:17 +0000 UTC]

show vagene 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mirudo [2017-12-10 03:24:27 +0000 UTC]

Wow.. gotta be careful looking that good lol, stunned me a bit XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MrsJuliaIAm [2017-12-08 05:23:42 +0000 UTC]

Why would you take a photo of you in shorts that are unzipped? I see this cinda shit every day and im tired of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 5

WarLordEra In reply to MrsJuliaIAm [2017-12-18 05:47:08 +0000 UTC]

I agree, it's always on the front page too. It was never like that on my old account. So frustrating!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LavenderPyon In reply to MrsJuliaIAm [2017-12-18 03:23:05 +0000 UTC]

Photography of people is classified under art

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WolfieFriday In reply to MrsJuliaIAm [2017-12-17 08:13:00 +0000 UTC]

y r u on every one of these? ya got no life?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Martsuia In reply to MrsJuliaIAm [2017-12-14 23:25:33 +0000 UTC]

lol ikr its really odd

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Eos-Ink In reply to MrsJuliaIAm [2017-12-14 01:53:34 +0000 UTC]

Yeah.. Thought the app was called DeviantART, hence the ART.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Temmie164 In reply to Eos-Ink [2017-12-14 19:26:52 +0000 UTC]

True!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

papadat In reply to ??? [2017-11-17 12:05:03 +0000 UTC]

THIS would be a nice wallpaper if it was hi-res. Still looks perfect btw.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>