HOME | DD

#crossover #korra #overwatch #legendofkorra #pharah #pharahoverwatch
Published: 2016-06-03 06:47:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 11296; Favourites: 313; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
An Overwatch/LoK crossover because my brown muscle girls are baeRelated content
Comments: 88
Xylophil In reply to ??? [2016-06-04 16:16:44 +0000 UTC]
Just because you have a few women as friends, doesn't mean you automatically respect them as people, and respect their choices for what they wish to do with their own bodies. I've had plenty "friends" who have never respected me.
You certainly didn't give that impression from your comments here, atleast.
And your profile certainly tells another story. Maybe work on that, then.
EDIT: Also, you seem to """respect""" women who aren't buff or even slightly more muscular than how they're usually depicted in the media. Another pretty good example that you don't respect women actually, lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DannyAndYoko In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 16:27:27 +0000 UTC]
If I didn't respect them, they wouldn't be my friends. XD
It's just a fact men are physically stronger then women.
No disrespect, just facts. :\
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xylophil In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 16:38:06 +0000 UTC]
"Men" aren't automatically "stronger" than "women". Dudes just use that """fact""" to stroke their insecure egos, trying to tell themselves that they are just "born better" than the opposite sex, when most of the time, they don't even bother to visit the gym.
You actually need to work your body, be healthy, and even have the better genes to actually be stronger than the average person. You also need strategy and technique and various styles and methods of thinking and executing your attacks and distributing your strength, which is necessary when fighting. Which, in fact, you're not born with.
And you can disrespect any kind of friend behind their back. It's a possibility, so don't use the "I have (x) friend so I can't possibly disrespect anything about them." excuse.
You're so invalid, it's amazing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Ganja-Shark In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 16:49:24 +0000 UTC]
I like how he says the man is stronger when theres tons of vids of those skinny asian women getting attacked on cam in public and literally SUPPLEXING the guy simply because of our graviational center.
As "buff" as you are as a man, a woman will still win in a fight lmao...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DannyAndYoko In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 16:42:28 +0000 UTC]
Yes they are automatically stronger.
If you place a man and a woman in the same room, neither of them have ever done any kind of training.
The man is still stronger.
I don't disrespect any friends, in front of them nor behind them.
That's something women tend to do. Or atleast known for.
You're so wrong it's hilarious. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xylophil In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 16:50:00 +0000 UTC]
That's an incredibly poor example. There's literally no way you can even get "a man" and "a woman" of exact same knowledge (or lack thereof), exact same weight, etc. There aren't "default people" around, and no one can ever do research on "the most default man/woman". There simply isn't one. As I said, everyone's bodies are different. EVERYONE'S. It doesn't even matter if their appearance or knowledge is the same. You can have any kind of other feature in their bodies or minds which makes them react differently, or distribute their weight differently.
For someone who claims to know a lot about bodybuilding and strength, you sure know jack shit.
Even then, "stronger" doesn't say how or what the person is doing. Again, you need to distribute your knowledge, weight, skills and all that properly around in order to overpower anyone, or any thing. You can't just run in and expect to win just because you have more muscle mass, or lift something up just because you have it. There's kids who have managed to work their bodies around and lift weights an average adult can. Try to explain that, when they have less muscle mass.
Also, the chances and variables of "two people put to fight against eachother" or "two people lifting the same thing" is way, way too big. They can play it in any kind of way, and the actions are completely unpredictable. It's too varied and large of a statement or example to ever have one correct answer.
Also, I like how you prove to be more and more sexist. Disrespecting and being gross towards women, and now generalizing them about how all of them behave.
You're pathetic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
DannyAndYoko In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 16:56:52 +0000 UTC]
Just the hypothetical average man and woman.
I know more then you.
Fools rush in, which is something I see women do alot more often. BTW. XD
Kids that lift weights worked on that to do so.
You're pathetic...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xylophil In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 17:00:18 +0000 UTC]
What "hypothetical average man/woman"? They don't exist, and again, you can't even make one with all the large variations and a shitton of data you'd have to collect from all around the world (an average from 3.5 billion people each?). And if you go by the average; the most average person (by population) is actually a 30yo chinese male, with no bodybuilding. Try to tell me that's "oh so strong", lol.
Another sexist, snarky little comment. Pathetic.
You just said "worked on", which exactly proves my point. They're capable of finding out other ways to do the same an "average" adult can, so it's most definetly not about muscle mass, or "buffness". It's like you forgot you were arguing against that statement.
Paaaathetic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
butlerfack In reply to Xylophil [2016-07-13 23:59:25 +0000 UTC]
The only thing this guy has been saying is that "it's a fact that women will never be as strong as men" without providing any evidence while also making pretty stupid accusations about how women act. There's no reasoning with these kinds of people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ganja-Shark In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 17:01:55 +0000 UTC]
Now he's back pedalling when he's proven wrong.
So P A T H E T I C
Men are such cowards lel
"ad infinitum"
He doesn't even understand the word "innate" and he uses shit like this to make himself look smarter..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DannyAndYoko In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 17:01:06 +0000 UTC]
We can discuss this ad infinitum, lets just call it a draw and both leave ke?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xylophil In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 17:07:01 +0000 UTC]
Very well.
Let's just say you left quite the poor impression of yourself, mkay?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DannyAndYoko In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 17:40:30 +0000 UTC]
Well, then why are you acting like one then? XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xylophil In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 17:47:53 +0000 UTC]
Not funny.
And again, sexist little jokes aren't adding anything to your intelligence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DannyAndYoko In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 17:50:33 +0000 UTC]
Not funny because you're the butt of it.
A quick witty joke actually does add to ones intelligence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xylophil In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 17:54:18 +0000 UTC]
It certainly doesn't add anything for you, anyway.
I'm done wasting my time with you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Ganja-Shark In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 17:56:43 +0000 UTC]
" You lost" I'm pretty sure the guy who cowarded out when presented solid arguments and proof is the one who loses.
People like these should be shot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DannyAndYoko In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 17:55:31 +0000 UTC]
You just say that because you lost that one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xylophil In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 17:59:55 +0000 UTC]
Nope.
You failed to provide anything to the conversation, and all you can end up with is shitty jokes, which make you look even more pathetic and incapable of adding any value to your points or thought process; which are way too generalized, lack any detail or variables or factual evidence, and are just incorrect in the real scale anyway.
You did a bunch of other cringe-worthy stuff, but I'm not all that bothered to list them all out for you.
Bye-bye.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ganja-Shark In reply to Xylophil [2016-06-04 16:56:01 +0000 UTC]
He's a delusional idiot who flaps his cock at anime boobies on deviantart, can you really expect more from human mistakes like him? Literally the only groups he's in is big, sexualized anime boobies lmao.
" I have two kids" yeah drowning in the cumrag you left on the floor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ganja-Shark In reply to ??? [2016-06-04 16:11:11 +0000 UTC]
They're actually healthier and cleaner than 80% of male bodybuilders, who have been proven to use various substances for their muscles, while these women have not.
You're pathetic cowards who have to use steroids to achieve muscles lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DannyAndYoko In reply to Ganja-Shark [2016-06-04 16:12:46 +0000 UTC]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVMib…
www.oddee.com/item_99125.aspx
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
DannyAndYoko In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 16:24:03 +0000 UTC]
It's just an example nothing to do with tunnel vision, hun
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ganja-Shark In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 16:16:17 +0000 UTC]
Please ignore the argument i made before of the difference in the majority and drug use per percentage lol. Give me more useless sources.
Wow! 8 women? Compared to THE ENTIRE male bodybuilding industry? Gee, you sure showed me!
You can't see more than tunnel vision, eh?
Men are too limited to have a discussion with. You keep proving me that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ganja-Shark In reply to ??? [2016-06-04 16:09:19 +0000 UTC]
i.imgur.com/Lt7CG6h.png
lol
you're dilusional
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DannyAndYoko In reply to Ganja-Shark [2016-06-04 16:10:19 +0000 UTC]
Nope, you're the delusional one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Adminium In reply to ??? [2016-06-03 21:17:25 +0000 UTC]
In all honesty its hard for me to draw non-muscled women now because I draw so many ripped chicks lmao! But yes I'm trying to get female anatomy down to a T, muscles or not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DannyAndYoko In reply to Adminium [2016-06-03 21:31:38 +0000 UTC]
I don't like too many muscles on women though.
They scarouse me... XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ganja-Shark In reply to DannyAndYoko [2016-06-04 11:15:42 +0000 UTC]
you're just insecure then
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DannyAndYoko In reply to Ganja-Shark [2016-06-04 15:32:03 +0000 UTC]
Obvious they aren't body builders XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |