HOME | DD

affect3d-com — Tara's butt big? part 2 + EROTIC .ART RANT [NSFW]

Published: 2012-07-28 22:03:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 77617; Favourites: 1481; Downloads: 2652
Redirect to original
Description Again serious question.

Last time the vote was inconclusive, so here's another angle of Tara show casing her cheeks

Let me know in the comments below, if they look right or need further tweaking. I did play with the curves a little, they do tend to look a little off on default V4.

Also she's sporting another set of heels because full nudity is just a little to obscene, isn't it!

-------------

START Deviantart EROTIC .ART RANT
(if you're not in the mood skip this)

This is has nothing to do with their stance on sexual themes on DA itself, their current restrictions are their choice and are fine in my opinion

I am really not sure I like Deviantart regulating .ART .
Do we really need to segment art?
Do we really need to have somebody governing, telling us what art is and what it is not?
Do we really need someone judging and labeling who deserves to be sanctioned as an artist?

I am for freedom of expression in any and all forms. In the spirit of the internet, everything is art and I for one believe everyone should be able to express themselves without being judged or labeled.

And yes! I'm specifically referring to erotic and pornographic art, which I happen to think is the most powerful and precious of all art forms. Yes, that is my opinion only and many would not share this opinion... however I DO consider it art and if there's some governing body saying otherwise, that to me is censorship!

But that's just my opinion. Would love to know what you think in the comments below!

END RANT

-------------

Oh and if you like my stuff, remember to WATCH ME . Thank you

More of Tara and Ayako
Related content
Comments: 142

affect3d-com In reply to ??? [2012-07-29 05:18:16 +0000 UTC]

I'm not offended at all, I like constructive criticism, you always pick up things you hadn't thought of So thanks for that!

Well there only few shadows on the body because I placed a light in front of her almost from the camera angle Not sure if a photographer would agree with that but does highlight the body contour. The hair I though was a lot more realistic than the previous attempt, but it's interesting that you think otherwise.

Damn, I was indeed a bit lazy in terms of the dents in the couch and pillow, got found out again

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

redig76 In reply to affect3d-com [2012-07-29 10:56:55 +0000 UTC]

the hair is too smooth, note how it looks like a shell of sorts. We are mammals, and that means hairy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to redig76 [2012-07-29 13:20:08 +0000 UTC]

hmm, to me there's a good variation in the flow of the hair some separate strands, etc... but maybe you're referring to the back of the head as there may be too few rogue hairs that you'd be able to see in the profile, I think that's what you mean, you may have a point there

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Azaurmyth In reply to ??? [2012-07-29 02:54:20 +0000 UTC]

Concerning the erotic and pornographic art, I agree with you.

However, I believe you're a bit idealistic when saying that artists shouldn't be judged for their art. If we weren't judged for our art, then I believe that we would grow no stronger as artists. In addition, if there were no judging, then we wouldn't need a filter that said to show us pieces that were popular within the last 8 hours or so. It's the judgement that makes some of us (me in particular) strive to be better so that I have people that look at my art as often as anyone else's. But that's just my 2 cents.

Make no mistake, I'm all for freedom of expression. But people all have differing opinions of what art is. Personally, I don't like the deviations that look like a toddler drew it during class on binder paper. I don't consider that art. Some one else might. It all depends on the person.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to Azaurmyth [2012-07-29 05:09:30 +0000 UTC]

Actually I agree with what you are saying, I would just call what you're referring to as being judged as being criticized. I personally like criticism a lot good or bad, for the reasons you pointed out, it helps to develop your art.

I guess what I'm referring to as being judged is others imposing their values on yours, like I may hate punk rock, I may think it's shallow and vulgar and criticize it as such, but it's not my place to say it's not music or even ban it.

And where does art being? The amount of paint I use, the amount of sweat and tears I invest, the amount of people that hit the like button? As you say everyone's interpretation of art differs. Art is what inspires and if a toddler drawing on binding paper inspires someone even if it's just themselves, in my eyes it's art.

In other words .art as a public TLD should be open to anyone not as handed out by Deviantart at their discretion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dejesusscott In reply to ??? [2012-07-29 00:06:57 +0000 UTC]

No, I really think dat you don't need to tweak dis baby at all. Great work by da way.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RajanWolf In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 23:53:41 +0000 UTC]

Dude... perfect. That's one fine 3D booty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AureaProporcion In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 23:38:06 +0000 UTC]

nice...I want that divan!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WireMonkey [2012-07-28 23:30:01 +0000 UTC]

I totally agree with you about erotic and porn art! I had these kind of discussion with an other DA member
People accept better gore or violence than vagina and big tits! This have no sense
Or you accept everything or nothing!
Limiting one kind of art and not an other is just hypocrisy! People have to use their mind!
MAD WORLD!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to WireMonkey [2012-07-29 01:43:17 +0000 UTC]

very good point, it's seriously amazing how violence is tolerated in society, feature movies, etc vs porn... one causes direct harm to human beings, the other does the exact opposite!!... now guess which of these gets the cold shoulder!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WireMonkey In reply to affect3d-com [2012-07-29 07:22:07 +0000 UTC]

Well I'm not saying porn isn't violent... It is as violence in movie
Porn can give pleasure to people but remains violent sometimes What I would to point out is that you can show many thing but with a sense of moralty! Why showing kids killed by monsters or women rapped by 50 dicks in the same time? Both are violent and don't have to be showed The world is violent enough and it gives bad ideas to peoples That's the problem!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to WireMonkey [2012-07-29 10:34:13 +0000 UTC]

Well sex and by extension porn are inherently the complete opposite of violence. I think what you are talking about is rape. Porn is not rape. Sex and porn exist to provide one of, if not the highest pleasure known to humans. It's built in by nature so that humans find it easier to procreate, some people seem to forget that sex is the act that causes us to exist!

But yes, violence can be added to porn or any other genre of movie it doesn't mean that sex or porn is violent in general, it is not

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WireMonkey In reply to affect3d-com [2012-07-29 12:37:30 +0000 UTC]

Totally agree! I hope people will undertand it but I don't think

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to WireMonkey [2012-07-29 13:12:54 +0000 UTC]

Yes, it's going to take time, but they will eventually, because it's the sensible thing to do

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PMSingWolf In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 23:28:10 +0000 UTC]

I think this is actually far better than the last one, it is toned down just enough but not too much to be just right, if not better.
I might not be as passionate toward erotic art as you are, but I think that it is still art and that is what I think DA is about, I mean, I see nothing wrong with the naked body and if you go through all the steps of an artist to produce said body, then in all rights, that is what it is. Plain and simple.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to PMSingWolf [2012-07-29 00:27:21 +0000 UTC]

yes exactly not asking for special treatment just equal treatment

and i think the mature filter is a good thing and should be all that's needed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PMSingWolf In reply to affect3d-com [2012-07-29 02:24:14 +0000 UTC]

I see it like so, if you can go online and find far worse things aside from porn/sexual things, opposed to murder/fighting/blood. I just don't see how sex or porn is a bad thing when kids, KIDS are watching things that are SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much worse in every sense of the word.

FIGHT DA POWAH!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to PMSingWolf [2012-07-29 10:35:10 +0000 UTC]

true

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LivingIsTheDream In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 23:17:45 +0000 UTC]

I will stop being a premium member if they interfere much more and dictate to us what we can and can't deem as art. From my view we should be able to make up our own minds.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to LivingIsTheDream [2012-07-29 01:46:45 +0000 UTC]

exactly I don't mind Deviantart choosing to restrict porn on their web site among many other art sites, but restricting something that should be open to anyone is a very different story

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TeiWicked In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 22:56:35 +0000 UTC]

great job

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chronophontes In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 22:43:16 +0000 UTC]

Exactly the right size. Big and BEAUTIFUL. (Too bad they don't make clothes for those sizes!)

As for your rant, I agree! I'm OK with the level of control that dA has exercised for the last five years, I suppose because it was there when I arrived and hasn't changed. Plus I have access to other sites for stuff that isn't dA-cool. But I would be VERY upset if they changed their policies in favor of more control.

This is a mixed bag. Some people, of course, want MORE control over "porn" - and everybody wants more control against theft. I suspect that the dA admins see the two control issues as being linked, since they are both about control - tighten one and you are in that much better position to tighten the other, if you are under pressure to do so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to Chronophontes [2012-07-28 23:33:31 +0000 UTC]

Yes I agree and don't get me wrong I'm not asking for DA to allow porn. I'm just saying someone who doesn't accept porn should not run .ART. And from their wording it seems they deem .ART to be something exclusive as per their or the art community's judgement. Art should not be judged at all! ... in my opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sasha1378 In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 22:38:39 +0000 UTC]

Not bad IMO. But for V4, to make the but look right, you need to do a LOT of tweaks... I'd say that, if her legs aren't fat at all, then you might wanna reduce the upper part of her back-thighs (around the point where the left foot shows). Gotta remember that, in this position, the flesh tends to move to the sides a bit (from the flex). Hard to describe it right, sorry xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to Sasha1378 [2012-07-28 23:25:25 +0000 UTC]

omg, so it's back to the drawing board

I did stretch and flatten the cheeks a lot, or is it just the upper leg, so basically you're saying she's too fat?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sasha1378 In reply to affect3d-com [2012-07-29 02:51:37 +0000 UTC]

Well, that depends lol I'm not completely sure what her butt/legs look like when she's standing up normally, so I'm not sure wether it's normal or not xD Supro's Lana used to have a quite large butt (before his last update of Lana's body). So it wasn't surprising to see her with big thighs when she was bending

Here's the kind of 3D butt I like (heavily tweaked of course): [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to Sasha1378 [2012-07-29 04:40:15 +0000 UTC]

very nice I agree, but hard to tell from that angle how it differs

but it's interesting that you think her thighs are too fat, I hadn't noticed that before... will take another look

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CorePhantom In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 22:28:25 +0000 UTC]

for rant, as well as Tara's gorgeous butt

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to CorePhantom [2012-07-29 13:14:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CorePhantom In reply to affect3d-com [2012-07-29 15:16:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Splicerion In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 22:25:52 +0000 UTC]

o:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

umbrafox In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 22:22:46 +0000 UTC]

+fav'd for your rant ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to umbrafox [2012-07-28 23:48:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Xelestial In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 22:21:49 +0000 UTC]

The .art rant...I don't feel like DA would do a good job of this anyway...I have mixed feelings on erotic and pornographic art, but I feel like DA is getting too controlling sometimes. Well, that's my two cents.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to Xelestial [2012-07-28 23:23:08 +0000 UTC]

yes not everyone agrees on erotic and especially pornographic art, but I think we're in a time and age now where freedom of expression is paramount to personal even community "taste"

there's nothing inherently wrong with sex unlike violence for example!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Xelestial In reply to affect3d-com [2012-07-28 23:37:28 +0000 UTC]

It's true but DA as a private website has the right to run it however they like, but that of course won't stop other sites from being created to house whatever arts DA rejects. I can see you feel passionately about this, but people have differing opinions due to their own ideas or culture and there is not a lot we can do about this

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to Xelestial [2012-07-29 01:51:25 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I agree with you as a private site DA should be able to restrict erotic art. My point is .art is as I see it a public TLD which should be available to everyone who deems themselves an artist (as long as no harm is done) not as judged by a select few.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Xelestial In reply to affect3d-com [2012-07-29 02:09:17 +0000 UTC]

I agree with that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

byrkut In reply to ??? [2012-07-28 22:18:24 +0000 UTC]

i think she looks about perfect! you should do a series of tara vs tentacle monster...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

affect3d-com In reply to byrkut [2012-07-28 22:57:36 +0000 UTC]

heh, does it have to be tentacles?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

byrkut In reply to affect3d-com [2012-07-28 23:19:58 +0000 UTC]

I would love to see tentacles lol but maybe that is just me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |