HOME | DD

alexiuss β€” PERSONAL CATASTROPHE AND PROBABLE SOLUTIONS
Published: 2013-04-10 15:27:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 36432; Favourites: 690; Downloads: 277
Redirect to original
Description Your life is headed for a disastrous end.

Everyone will die.
That is a fact.

Especially you.
You will die.

Your friends will die.
Everyone you know will die.
These are indisputable facts.

Your body will break down and crash in one way or another.
Your heart will stop.
Your brain synapses will cease firing.
100% guaranteed termination.
You and everyone you know has less than 122 years left.
The oldest person alive was 122.
Oldest person alive now is 115.

Death should be your number one enemy.
Do not accept it.
Do not welcome it.

The question is - are you willing to extend, improve your life and the lives of those you love?
Why haven't you done it yet? Do you think it's impossible?
Flying for us was impossible until airplanes were built.

Now, the question is- how do we stop the personal catastrophe of death?
The logical answer is - science!
We can slow death down using modern medicine, and we can stop and reverse some accidental causes of death.
Aging is one cause that we cannot currently stop.
Should we simply focus all our efforts on stopping aging?

No.

Humanity as a whole is not ready for immortality.
If immortality was invented tomorrow, only the richest would attain it and use it as a tool to gain more control over others.
Control that equals to war and misery. Are the richest countries, companies and people solving problems?
They are not- a lot of them support wars and fund unsustainable developments.
If immortality was given to everyone tomorrow, overpopulation would quickly destroy civilization.

Before we can stop aging we MUST shift the pattern of human thought itself.
Of your thinking and my thinking.
Can it be done? Yes.
Will you do it? Probably not.
Not unless you take my words seriously and read this article every morning when you wake up.
Not unless you and I shift, or at least learn to shift our modes of thinking entirely into logical, rational and problem solving.

Basically, become amazing at life and solve all your problems.
Once all of your personal problems are solved, you can focus on solving problems of humanity as a whole.

-How does an individual become a problem solver?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Step 1:
Become a rationalist.

Understand the principle of "Occam's razor" to manage your life.
"Simpler explanations are, other things being equal, generally better than more complex ones.
Among competing hypotheses, the one that makes the fewest assumptions should be selected."
Occam's razor is used in medicine when there are many explanations for symptoms and the simplest diagnosis is usually is the correct one.
If a child has a runny nose, they probably have the common cold instead of a rare birth defect.
If a tree suddenly feel down in a forest - wind was responsible, not a wizard.

When faced with two or more answers, you can use Occam's razor to trim away improbable ones.
Any statement or answer made without proof or scientific evidence backing it, can be trimmed.

Learn to apply skepticism when faced with new information, especially information that has no logic or scientific proof behind it.

If you enjoy reading sci-fi books, a fun way to become a rationalist is to read "Harry potter and the methods of rationality".
Google it and read it.
If you know of more articles that explain rationalism and help learn it, link in your comments.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Step 2:
Understand statistics and probability.

Embrace the scientific method.

Statistics rule the world. Probability defines it.
If you understand statistics you can master the art of understanding and interpreting reality most correctly.
If you know which decision leads to statistical win, you can make great decisions in life and solve problems very easily.
There is a pattern to all things in life. If you can figure out this pattern you will accomplish anything.
Yes, you need to know math, especially % math, to do it!

Real life example:
In 2007 I used probability to figure out a statistical pattern that would (at that time) get my artworks seen by millions all over the net.
Seasonscape now has 1.8 million views just on deviantart and I'm a successful freelance illustrator.

Others:
Joan R. Ginther, a former statistics professor, had won four different multi-million dollar jackpots in Texasβ€”three of which came from purchasing scratch-off lottery tickets. It was speculated that there was actually a pattern to where and when the winning tickets were sold, and that Professor Ginther had figured out this pattern.

If you know of great articles that explain how to learn statistics and help apply them, link in your comments.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Step 3:
Become a problem solver.

Google is a collective knowledge of all of humanity. It has countless answers to questions(including incorrect ones).

A rational googler can differentiate between incorrect answers and correct ones.
A statistics-knowledgeable googler can calculate the probability of the most correct answer, discarding incorrect ones,
(by calculating amount of proof that applies to each answer and by statistically estimating how likely is each thing to happen)
Thus such a googler can answer ANY question as correct and as detailed as possible.
A talented googler can solve almost any problem in their personal life and help others solve their problems.

When faced with buying a new product- Google about it and read some reviews.
Some products are 50% cheaper online, obsolete, have better versions, or do more harm than good.

When faced with any problem in life from small to impossibly large- learn to immediately google for existing solutions or at least google and find tools that can help arrive at a solution faster.

If you know tutorials on improving googling skills, post them in comments.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Step 4:
Change the world.

Embrace and promote scientific literacy.

-How do we create a "problem-solving" society?
We must raise a generation that is masterful at problem solving.
We must raise a generation that actively uses the internet to learn.

Education itself must be changed from "fact-memorizing" to "problem solving".
As soon as kids are old enough to understand logic, rationality and probability,
they must be taught how to utilize the full potential of google (or any other search engine).

Schools must first teach logical thinking and scientific literacy, and then they must teach the "art of googling for answers".
Once these two steps are achieved, a student has the skills to move forward on their own, solving all basic problems in their way and finding or creating tools to solve more difficult problems.

Imagine a school with wi-fi where students would be taught to to google answers on their laptops, instead of forever reading facts from books.
Imagine a school where students would be taught how to look at search queries and taught to understand which answer is most likely to be correct out of all the answers google provides.
Imagine a school where logic, skepticism, and critical thinking (information evaluation) are taught.
Imagine a school where students and teachers would be allowed to argue among each other to figure out which answer from google is most probable and most logical and which are answers can be disproved and how.
What if kids learned how to get their questions answered, instead of being provided answers by teachers to memorize?
What if kids were actively encouraged to google all the things in school?
What if right away kids would learn how to google topics that they are actively interested in learning about?

If all knowledge is immediately accessible, there is potential to destroy embarrassment and ignorance.
If a student is talented at something, they could immediately learn specific skills that would move their talents forward.

What if we figure out a way to raise kids who would actually get ALL of their questions answered from the beginning of their life?
A generation of kids who wouldn't be too afraid/embarrassed to ask the internet for help and would always know how to ask the right questions to get the right answers.

The world can be a much better place for everyone, if we change our mode of thinking from:
"oh god why"
to
"lets google it and solve this problem".
Related content
Comments: 290

Meowmeowmeow21 In reply to ??? [2013-04-11 01:01:00 +0000 UTC]

I believe it is a fact, your argument is invalid

Any further comments of argument will be flagged as spam. I have made my point, now I will take my leave.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BlazingBlaze In reply to Meowmeowmeow21 [2013-04-11 01:10:38 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't consider this arguing. I thought it was a calm conversation. My arguing contains occasional cursing and clear sarcasm. None of my previous responses to you had any of that.

Please tell me how it is invalid. Clearly you just have a problem with those that think differently.

And that "threat" only proves my above accusation.

I hope I've made mine, although clearly it's been ignored, since someone has zero tolerance for opinions that aren't their own.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Meowmeowmeow21 In reply to BlazingBlaze [2013-04-11 01:13:51 +0000 UTC]

I'm answering this one since you're not arguing.

I believe for my own purposes that Heaven is real, and I will be there someday. I take this as a fact, therefor your saying that it does not exist is an invalid argument when directed at me. You can have your opinion, just don't expect me to share it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

MorphoAdonis In reply to Meowmeowmeow21 [2013-04-11 01:34:22 +0000 UTC]

You have the belief, faith, and opinion that heaven is real, but even a good Christian does not say it is a fact; It's called faith.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Meowmeowmeow21 In reply to MorphoAdonis [2013-04-11 01:36:08 +0000 UTC]

STOP ARGUING WITH ME FOR THE LOVE OF GOD I SAY ONE BLOODY THING AND EVERYONE ATTACKS ME!!! I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MorphoAdonis In reply to Meowmeowmeow21 [2013-04-11 01:57:23 +0000 UTC]

Don't share your opinion if you can't handle others sharing theirs'.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BlazingBlaze In reply to Meowmeowmeow21 [2013-04-11 01:20:56 +0000 UTC]

Please tell me how "that's a matter of opinion" means that I'm saying it doesn't exist.

If you can't quote me correctly, don't do it. It's beyond annoying when someone says I said something that I obviously never said.

I didn't even expect you to care for it. Why would I expect you to repeat it?

I still see no invalid argument, especially considering I never said it didn't exist.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Meowmeowmeow21 In reply to BlazingBlaze [2013-04-11 01:34:17 +0000 UTC]

This is the reason I said I was going to ignore all further comments. Not because I have no argument to defend, but because no matter how many times I uphold my point you people keep incessantly attacking me just because the existence of a God would mean that there is in fact a right and wrong, which you people refuse to believe like little children disobeying their parents and not wanting to do what anyone says but themselves. I have made my point, I believe in God, and there is no changing my mind. I am not telling you to believe it, I am simply exercising my right to have my own opinion. You will find lots of opinions on the internet that you don't agree with, to which you need ignore if you don't believe. Other people will have their own thoughts, and each of them are fully justified in speaking them. If you want to be a flaming, argumentative child about it, take yourself and go elsewhere.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BlazingBlaze2 In reply to Meowmeowmeow21 [2013-04-11 01:50:02 +0000 UTC]

You didn't say you'd ignore all further comments. You said you'd ignore any further comments of arguing. Again, this is not arguing. If it was, I'd be cursing right now, which is honestly what I want to do.

Do not tell me what I'm doing. I know what I'm doing, and I know for a fact that it's not attacking. You can tell me what you think I'm doing, and I'll happily tell you whether you are correct or incorrect. In this case, you are wrong.

I'm not telling you to believe anything other than the fact that what you said is not a fact. And honestly, I don't think I really care if you decide to accept it or not. I've made my point, and it was ignored.

It's funny when people stoop down to name-calling. It makes them seem less mature.

You may not be telling us to believe that, but you are telling us to do plenty of other things, and that I do not appreciate. I don't like to be bossed around by people I don't know.

It's funny. All I did was point out a fact, and I received a total negative attitude. All because someone can't tolerate opinions that aren't their own. And honestly, I can't tolerate yours. But you see how easy it is to act? I acted mature and calm, like someone much above my age group, and it was rather easy, which is odd, considering that I often say many things out of anger, which I haven't this time.

Thank you for the indecent conversation. It was nice, especially knowing that at parts I was right.

And you didn't explain how what I said meant it didn't exist.

Now, since clearly you really can't take my opinion since you blocked my main, I'll just let it all go, since I was clearly right.

Again, thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BlazingBlaze In reply to BlazingBlaze2 [2013-04-11 01:59:41 +0000 UTC]

Oh, and I've seen your "note". Great way to make yourself look mature. Really, that's completely great. It really let's everyone know just how mature you can be.

Again, my accusation was proven to be correct due to your behavior. If you can't deal when someone else is right, don't bother talking to them. Give up in the end, so they know that they're right a whole lot sooner.

It'll save you the frustration.

And trust me, I know how you feel >.>. I hate voicing my opinion. Which is why I simply stated what you said was nothing more than that. I didn't voice an opinion then. I voiced a fact. One you should be well aware of.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheMightyGonthorion In reply to ??? [2013-04-11 00:29:17 +0000 UTC]

Then we can conveniently absolve ourselves of any and all responsibility with a clean conscience.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Meowmeowmeow21 In reply to TheMightyGonthorion [2013-04-11 00:35:07 +0000 UTC]

According to my line of thought, the only thing that needs to be done is what is required to reach Heaven, i.e. what is outlined in the Bible. Loving God, and loving others.

You would prefer living in a world where no one thought life had any meaning because it will all eventually end?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheMightyGonthorion In reply to Meowmeowmeow21 [2013-04-11 17:33:35 +0000 UTC]

In my opinion, the fact that life ends makes life precious. You treat others well, not for a postmortem reward or punishment, but to leave the world in a better state than you were born into it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Meowmeowmeow21 In reply to TheMightyGonthorion [2013-04-11 20:48:19 +0000 UTC]

God gives me a reason to treat others well. This is my opinion, you reserve the right to disagree

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jierat In reply to ??? [2013-04-10 23:57:56 +0000 UTC]

Get out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Meowmeowmeow21 In reply to Jierat [2013-04-11 00:11:28 +0000 UTC]

This is my opinion. You reserve the right to disagree.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jierat In reply to Meowmeowmeow21 [2013-04-11 00:19:18 +0000 UTC]

Opinion? An opinion would be "I think heaven is real." You just flat out said that it is fact and everyone who thinks otherwise is wrong.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Mousienorn In reply to Jierat [2013-04-11 00:30:34 +0000 UTC]

Acualy if you read his comment you will notice he stated "You reserve the right to disagree." Nullifying your statment that he believes "Everyone who thinks otherwise is wrong."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jierat In reply to Mousienorn [2013-04-11 00:37:28 +0000 UTC]

Even so, he knew he would be offending people and that's just rude. Especially since after two comments (that weren't particularly mean) he blocked me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mousienorn In reply to Jierat [2013-04-11 00:42:02 +0000 UTC]

And I supose telling him "Get out." was a friendly statement fasioned in order to not offend anyone?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jierat In reply to Mousienorn [2013-04-11 01:27:22 +0000 UTC]

I said not particularly mean, just as rude as he was. I never said I was being friendly, you misunderstand.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mousienorn In reply to Jierat [2013-04-11 13:43:00 +0000 UTC]

So you are angered at him for being "rude" yet because you have a different view you are allowed to be "rude" and he should just accept that you are above others?
Hardly seems fair to such as me...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jierat In reply to Mousienorn [2013-04-11 18:37:53 +0000 UTC]

Accept that I am above others? You lost me. I was trying to remind him in an equally rude way that he was offending people that my not believe in heaven. Stop making assumptions.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Meowmeowmeow21 In reply to Jierat [2013-04-11 00:26:39 +0000 UTC]

That is what I believe. If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ValosBlur In reply to ??? [2013-04-10 23:34:19 +0000 UTC]

~If immortality was invented tomorrow, only the richest would attain it and use it as a tool to gain more control over others.~
You gave me an idea.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MasterSamwise In reply to ??? [2013-04-10 23:30:57 +0000 UTC]

not that I disagree with your ideas about the rational way of life, but I do not see immortality as a good thing. I would not institute it in a world where everyone lived in accordance with these ideas. Even in a world without war, without hate, without greed, I would not want immortality. I could not stand to go on for centuries, even in happines.

However, the fact I intend to leave this world does not mean I am careless of its condition. I applaud and support your ideals for a better life.

well witten, sir!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NatApocalypse In reply to ??? [2013-04-10 23:26:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BlackLight8808 In reply to ??? [2013-04-10 23:24:41 +0000 UTC]

Using the Internet to learn isn't a good idea. A textbook is written by people who have spent a great deal of time learning a subject. When you search something on Google, it doesn't find the right answer, it finds the most relevant page based on what you typed in, often leading to Yahoo! Answers or forums, and the answers there can be written by anyone with Internet access. Statistics? Buddy, this is someone who is looking for an answer. They don't know what they're looking for. You expect them to use statistics to find answers? How?
The part about Occam's Razor is nice, though. Its a good reminder for me, since I tend to freak out when things don't go according to plan.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SlightlyCrying In reply to BlackLight8808 [2013-04-10 23:44:42 +0000 UTC]

You ask too many questions to be able to understand rationalism. Problem solved.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BlackLight8808 In reply to SlightlyCrying [2013-04-10 23:57:32 +0000 UTC]

Do I, though? Wouldn't not asking questions and assuming something based on nothing be irrational? Isn't rationality being able to look at something critically, to ask yourself "What went wrong here?" and "How do I fix this?", and to answer those questions?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

SlightlyCrying In reply to BlackLight8808 [2013-04-12 00:31:21 +0000 UTC]

It is not.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xenxi-the-observer In reply to BlackLight8808 [2013-04-11 00:53:28 +0000 UTC]

do you realize just how contridictory your comments just ended up as there? your questions were typed in a way that suggests you already have a idea of what you think is right and are only asking questions to get a point across that only you can be right. also you can easily find everything thats in a book online, most books are actualy online also. so the two things are not mutually exclusive. although i disagree with how slightlycrying said what he did i have to agree but based on diffrent reasoning, which is: if you cant even keep from contradicting yourself then you have a long ways to go in order to just be able to think at a moderate level let alone rationalize.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BlackLight8808 In reply to xenxi-the-observer [2013-04-11 01:22:23 +0000 UTC]

Books online, point taken. Still, books are written by people who have studied the subject for quite a while, not someone on a chat room. Its sort of important to find a good source rather than Google it and use statistics on something you know very little about to determine an answer.
The tone of my second post was intended to be sarcasticish (definitely not a word). I'm totally open to be proven wrong, but SlightlyCrying's post doesn't do anything but say that I ask questions, therefore I am irrational. I sort of have a kneejerk reaction to those kinds of posts, so apologies.
Lastly, you say my comments are contradictory, but I'm sort of confused as to how. Could you explain why you feel this way, just for clarity's sake?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

xenxi-the-observer In reply to BlackLight8808 [2013-04-11 04:55:38 +0000 UTC]

well its infered that you know how to find information taken from facts off of the internet, since not everyone just makes something up and some people do happen to quote some very usefull stuff. so although at times some of his examples are bad examples the basic principul holds.

the basic thing is that your saying that hes wrong to make that conclusion becuase if you didnt you would be makeing assumptions. but the part thats contridictory is that the way you wrote your first message implys that you asked the questions to make him wrong, thus already makeing an assumtion that your right. and thus how its contridictory.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BlackLight8808 In reply to xenxi-the-observer [2013-04-11 11:47:28 +0000 UTC]

Okay, fair enough.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

YourNinthLife In reply to BlackLight8808 [2013-04-11 02:28:42 +0000 UTC]

I agree with you on almost everything yu have stated; while the Internet may be a resourceful place, but we also have to know how to use it effectively. Information from just 'Google' or any other search engine just isn't enough. Maybe a specialized search that could search through books written professionally on the subject. That would be much more effective than searching through- as you previously said- forums and comments posted on sites such as Yahoo! Answers, which are usually opinionated, nor well researched.

I also agree that it is very important to ask questions. To question others and to even question yourself. And maybe, through that process of thought and discussion of ideas, you will learn something more and have a much better understanding of the information at hand. There may betimes you eve contradict yourself; but that may help you arrive at a more solid and thought-out answer than you had before.

Haven't we all heard the phrase, 'Learn from your mistakes'? We can't possibly learn everything from just statistics, figures, and data -nor from just intuition either, I admit that as well. But you must arrive at your own personal conclusion mentally at some point to fully understand what it is you are researching, etc. And sometimes that personal conclusion agrees, and sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes we are wrong, and other times we may be right. But at some point we may be wrong, and we most certainly shall; and when that happens it is important that we understand our mistake, but most of all that we understand that we made a mistake and accept that. When will anyone ever learn anything more if they refuse and deny any other knowledge or perspective? And to further understand their mistake, they may ask questions.
And then you may reach another conclusion.
And again, it may or may not be wrong.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mancusio [2013-04-10 23:17:29 +0000 UTC]

So long as the same powerful people we fear today never get into Google, this guide is golden.

But in seriousness, thanks. I'm gonna try hard to follow it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vindurza [2013-04-10 23:15:37 +0000 UTC]

... uh huh

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sarah-BK In reply to ??? [2013-04-10 22:45:07 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful way of thinking you have. (:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

0rcinus In reply to ??? [2013-04-10 22:40:14 +0000 UTC]

well thats one way to make me more paranoid about what I was already paranoid about

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dark-Lemur In reply to ??? [2013-04-10 22:39:12 +0000 UTC]

Some of those things do not necssarily apply to one if one believes in the an afterlife. And believing in an afterlife should no preclude taking these steps.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

unde2aker In reply to Dark-Lemur [2013-04-10 23:09:18 +0000 UTC]

death applies to all, no matter beliefs or creed, it is one of the few things we are all equal in

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WearyWere [2013-04-10 22:32:39 +0000 UTC]

0v0 I have to disagree with that first part - Death is not the enemy. Death is that friend who's late to the party. >v<

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

eBAMBOO [2013-04-10 22:31:40 +0000 UTC]

Most of everything you said here makes sense to me. And yet some of it is not logical at all.

Why have death as your enemy. If you cannot avoid it, change it, or overcome it, why my must one strive to oppose it? Instead of hating it, one must accept the fact that they will die. To understand that, one can live a full life, and strive to fulfill their dreams. With no death, there is no purpose to life.

I believe in problem solving. I believe that copying notes and facts will not lead to a successful education. However, one must learn facts that must be learned in order to problem solve. Knowledge is the greatest weapon and shield in the world. If one has knowledge, they can change the world. Problem solving is helpful when the problem is statistical or lengthy. However, life is not about statistics. Life is not a straight line. Life has twists and turns that you must learn to navigate, and problem solving can help, but is not the solution.

My biggest dispute that I have in this writing is the notion about using Google. One cannot google everything that must be solved. Google does not know everything, and Google is not the solution to the problems we have. This notion to use Google to solve ones problem, to me, is hypocritical to the point you made about problem solving. If one is to problem solve, they have to learn to be independent thinkers. Using Google to solve every problem would be the greatest form of dependency. Using Google to find the solution to a problem is not problem solving, it's using the easiest way to get mediocre results. To solve anything in the world, one must think independently and learn how to solve problems on their own. Not everyone has access to Google either.

There are many interesting points in this, but both have conflicting views. I believe in independent thinking, and I believe in learning. Knowledge is the fruit of life, to have knowledge is to live. And to have knowledge, one must learn. And to learn, one must find the answers on their own. everyone has knowledge, everyone has the capability to learn. Problem solving skills are necessary in some aspects of life, but raw knowledge must be obtained to problem solve.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

YourNinthLife In reply to eBAMBOO [2013-04-11 02:31:32 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, that was very well put. I don't believe you have stated anything that I agree with. ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

eBAMBOO In reply to YourNinthLife [2013-04-11 02:56:51 +0000 UTC]

We are all entitled to our own opinions and thought processes. Some may agree and many will not approve, but no one can say it's wrong. (Unless of course you believe murdering people over the last cookie eaten is rational) ^^

Also, your art is very good. I love seeing your concepts, and how it's put together. What's your medium and (simplified) processed? If you don't mind me asking.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

YourNinthLife In reply to eBAMBOO [2013-04-13 04:34:08 +0000 UTC]

Oh my gosh! I think I said that you had stated nothing I agreed with, but I actually meant you had said nothing I couldn't agree more with. Sorry for that mistype!

But yeah, I also agree that conflicting opinions don't mean one is right while the other is wrong. What really is a wrong answer?- especially in philosophy.

And oh, thank you so much about my art! ^^ Although I don't have hardly anything submitted, haha! Just a few traditional sketches, some ink and acrylic paint, and then one digital muro art, all uploaded for my friends whom I've drawn them for. x3 But thank you so much on the compliment, that is really nice of you to go out of your way and view my gallery as well as comment on it.~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

eBAMBOO In reply to YourNinthLife [2013-04-17 22:26:09 +0000 UTC]

I thought that maybe it was a mistype but I went along with it anyway!

And no problem about your art. Ive been meaning to get into painting, but I havent gotten around to getting the paint or canvas. I mainly do sketching and water color. I only submit digital art on DA because I don't have a reliable scanner.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

YourNinthLife In reply to eBAMBOO [2013-04-18 03:14:04 +0000 UTC]

Haha, I really don't do painting that much, actually. Just a few special things I did for some lovely friends of mine.~ Although, I have been meaning to practice painting and water color as well. They're both really unique fields of art that I've been wanting to practice, but I don't really have the time or patience. v.v

I mostly do pencil and/or pen sketches and drawings now, as that's all that I can do and have the time for, unfortunately. And like you, my scanner's shot so I can't really upload traditional art very easily. >.>''

I did happen to check out your gallery, and it is really awesome! I can't really do digital art to save my life, but it's something I really want to get into, and you are very wonderful at it!~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

eBAMBOO In reply to YourNinthLife [2013-04-20 21:44:29 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, most of the art is do these days are sketches and quick digital paintings. Its fun, and that's usually where most of my ideas come from.

And thank you for the compliment on my art!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>