HOME | DD

Published: 2013-11-08 17:51:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 28800; Favourites: 1726; Downloads: 294
Redirect to original
Description
Mariaβ¦Related content
Comments: 116
XXFanXofX4869XX In reply to ??? [2013-11-20 23:38:50 +0000 UTC]
But Eggman still used Emerl's parts to make Gemerl. That technically makes Gemerl a revived Emerl.
π: 0 β©: 1
GlitchSamo21 In reply to XXFanXofX4869XX [2013-11-20 23:43:14 +0000 UTC]
Same personality? I disagreed.
π: 0 β©: 1
XXFanXofX4869XX In reply to GlitchSamo21 [2013-11-20 23:47:46 +0000 UTC]
No, not the same personality. Well.....not until AFTER Tails and Cream recover Gemerl's remains after the fight between Perfect Gemerl and Super Sonic/Eggman.
Β
But SEGA does hint at them being the same character. Both Emerl and Gemerl were recovered on a beach, tinkered with by Tails, and bonded closely with Cream. (In Emerl's case, he didn't truly start bonding with Cream until they were kidnapped by Eggman in Cream's episode in Sonic Battle.)
π: 0 β©: 1
GlitchSamo21 In reply to XXFanXofX4869XX [2013-11-21 00:02:13 +0000 UTC]
Alright then. Why are we still talking on FanXofX's stuffs?
π: 0 β©: 1
XXFanXofX4869XX In reply to GlitchSamo21 [2013-11-21 00:44:55 +0000 UTC]
???
Β
Wait, what? I don't understand.
π: 0 β©: 1
GlitchSamo21 In reply to XXFanXofX4869XX [2013-11-21 00:50:01 +0000 UTC]
If we're discussing about Sonic stuffs, why are we bothering XXFanXofX4869XX? Let's get off his article and onto Note or Shout Page, should we?
π: 0 β©: 1
XXFanXofX4869XX In reply to GlitchSamo21 [2013-11-21 01:59:34 +0000 UTC]
Β
Except we're not on my page.....we're on ~aoki6311 's page. Well, technically her deviation.
π: 0 β©: 1
GlitchSamo21 In reply to XXFanXofX4869XX [2013-11-21 03:12:45 +0000 UTC]
That's the reason why I had to move off aoki's page... I think we annoyed her enough.
π: 0 β©: 1
XXFanXofX4869XX In reply to GlitchSamo21 [2013-11-21 03:14:24 +0000 UTC]
Or we could be not annoying her at all. She hasn't tried to make us move, so either she's ignoring us or she doesn't even know we're holding this conversation on her page.
π: 0 β©: 0
XXFanXofX4869XX In reply to ??? [2013-11-13 23:50:05 +0000 UTC]
I'm not nagging! I'm just trying to get some answers. Is it wrong for one to be inquisitive when there is a lack of evidence in an argument?
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev |