HOME | DD
bagera3005 — EWR VJ 101
by
Published: 2011-11-21 00:28:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 13219; Favourites: 76; Downloads: 260
Redirect to original
Description
EWR VJ 101The EWR VJ 101 was an experimental German jet fighter VTOL tiltjet aircraft. VJ stood for "Versuchsjäger", (German for "Experimental Fighter").[1] It was to be the basis for a successor to the F-104G Starfighter, but was cancelled in 1968 after a five-year test program. The VJ 101 was one of the first V/STOL designs to have the potential for eventual Mach 2 flight.
Design and development
Heinkel and Messerschmitt had developed designs to meet the requirements of VTOL flight and by 1959, the two companies, along with Bölkow, had created a joint venture company called EWR, to build the VJ 101 C. The new proposal merged the characteristics of earlier Bölkow, Heinkel and Messerschmitt designs into a sleek, streamlined platform. The VJ 101 was similar in appearance to the Bell XF-109, both with rotating engines in nacelles at the wingtips. In addition to the wingtip engines, two further lift jets were installed in the fuselage to supplement the main engines in hovering flight.
In order to test the concept, EWR built a test rig called the Wippe (seesaw) in early 1960. The simple device incorporated a rudimentary cockpit on a horizontal beam with a "lift" engine mounted vertically at the centre for preliminary single-axis tests of the control system.[2] A later "hover rig" was built that had the skeletal fuselage of the VJ 101C with three Rolls-Royce RB108 engines installed in the approximate positions they would occupy in the final flying version. The small engines each had 2,100 lbf (9.3 kN) thrust, enough to lift the test rig. After initial testing in May 1961 from a telescopic column, the new rig was able to "fly" in free flight in March 1962.[3] Additional tests with a cloth "skin" simulating fuselage and wings proved to be successful (showing satisfactory control in all seasons and weather conditions).[3]
Testing and evaluation
Two prototypes were built: X-1 and X-2. On 10 April 1963, the X-1 made its first hovering flight. The first transition from hovering flight to horizontal flight took place on 20 September 1963. The VJ 101C X-1 flew 40 aerodynamic flights, 24 hover flights and 14 full transitions. During these tests the sound barrier was broken, for the first time by a vertical take-off aircraft, but on 14 September 1964 a defect in the autopilot caused a crash. On July 29, 1964 the VJ 101 C flew at Mach 1.04 without use of an afterburner.[4]
The second prototype X2 with a new autopilot made a successful transition on 22 October 1965. The tests were subsequently continued with X-2, which in contrast to X-1 had afterburners. However the project was cancelled in 1968. The proposed VJ 101 D Mach 2 interceptor was never built. VJ 101 C X 2 hangs today in the Deutsches Museum in Munich.
Although the VJ 101C did not proceed to production status, other projects including the Mirage IIIV, Hawker P.1154 (a supersonic parallel to what would become the Hawker Siddeley Harrier) and the much later F-35 Lightning II showed the promise of VTOL fighters.
[edit] Specifications (VJ 101C X-2)
Aircraft VJ101C RH.jpg
Data from Macdonald Aircraft Handbook
General characteristics
Crew: 1
Length: 15.7 m (51 ft 6 in)
Wingspan: 6.61 m (21 ft 8 in)
Height: 4.1 m (13 ft 6 in)
Max takeoff weight: 6,100 kg (13,420 lb)
Powerplant: 6 × Rolls-Royce RB145 turbojets, 12.2 kN (2,750 lbf) each
Performance
Maximum speed: Mach 1.04 achieved
Related content
Comments: 6
It makes sense even today. Even our most advanced aircaft need runways. Take out the runways, and our air power is crippled.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The major European NATO countries devoted to the V.T.O.L. formula reasoning that, in a conflict against Warsaw Pact forces, all of his forward airstrips will be destroyed in the first step of a Soviet attack. Combat aircraft must, obviously, had no need for conventional airstrips, as Germany knew well from his late wartime experience. This event is logical even today, but all except the BAE Harrier and his McDonnell Douglas descendant (AV8), were cancelled (including the very promising EWR VJ 101 and the VAK 191). The Soviet Yak-38 Forger survived by finding home in a pair of hybrid aircraft carriers.
It was logical? Maybe the high money sums devoted to conventional aircrafts then in costly development were put at risk if new, advanced V.T.O.L. designs went to scene. Any comment?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It looks as if each nacelle uses a single shock cone to produce an oblique shock for two engines. I don't think I've seen such an arrangement before. Very interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
