HOME | DD

Published: 2012-12-15 04:20:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 2275; Favourites: 30; Downloads: 61
Redirect to original
Description
aim-164 FenghuangNext Generation Air Dominance Missiles
Triple target Terminator (T3); DRADM
DARPA has awarded two competitive development contracts to Boeing and raytheon, to conduct conceptual design and development of a multi-mission air/air and air/ground missile dubbed 'Triple Target Terminator' (T3). The program, part of the agency's advanced weapons initiative, is pursuing a high speed, long-range missile that can engage enemy aircraft, cruise missile and air defense targets. T3 will be designed for internal carriage on stealth aircraft like the F-35, F-22 and F-15SE, or externally on fighters, bombers and UAVs.
T3 would allow strike fighter aircraft to rapidly switch between air-to-air and air-to-surface (counter-air) capabilities. The missile is likely to be equipped with multi-mode seeker and network-centric data links, providing high level of target discrimination, employment of kinetic network-centric applications and human-in-the-loop control. An advanced multi-purpose warhead will be required to engage the wide range of targets with maximum lethality.
Raytheon and Boeing were each awarded $21.3 million contracts in November 2010, for the development of T3. The companies are expected to deliver conceptual designs within a year, and continue developing the future weapon, providing prototype missiles for flight demonstration by 2014.
Parallel to DARPA's T3 program the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) is also examining new technologies for a future air/air weapon known as 'DRADM'. Boeing was awarded contracts for the demonstration of a vector thrust propulsion and control, terminal guidance sensors, shaped-charge warhead and fuse mechanism for such a missile. In 2010 DARPA has also funded technology tradeoff studies associated with similar aspects of T3. It has yet to be determined whether the two programs will compete or supplement each other in a common design. ATK, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman have teamed up to pursue future, dual-role missile development to date, but none of these companies were awarded contracts for T3 or DRADM.
Whatever the future missile will be, it is expected to replace current AIM-120 AMRAAM and AGM-88 HARM 'air dominance' missiles currently in service with U.S. air Combat Command, U.S. Navy, Marines, and many allied air forces.
Related content
Comments: 18
ArmamentDawg [2012-12-15 21:05:10 +0000 UTC]
As "Fenghuang" is the Chinese word for "Phoenix," is this supposed to represent a reverse-engineered Phoenix missile? Will we see a reverse-engineered F-14 Tomcat next?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bagera3005 In reply to ArmamentDawg [2012-12-15 21:26:56 +0000 UTC]
its a us next generation update of Phoenix china tried copying one they got from Iran an it fucked up
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ArmamentDawg In reply to bagera3005 [2012-12-15 23:24:06 +0000 UTC]
Do you have links to articles describing Chinese efforts to reverse-engineer the Phoenix missile?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dystatic-Studio In reply to ArmamentDawg [2012-12-19 21:29:04 +0000 UTC]
Well, I can help, and it's English.
[link] (It's actually that Chinese R-Eed the Russian R77 firstly and domesticated with many improvements. It's more likely to aim for AIM-120 instead of retired Phoenix)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ArmamentDawg In reply to Dystatic-Studio [2012-12-20 04:16:18 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, Dystactic-Studio.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bagera3005 In reply to ArmamentDawg [2012-12-16 01:35:34 +0000 UTC]
will dig them out it was long time ago
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Coffeebean2 [2012-12-15 04:53:50 +0000 UTC]
nice name bro.
I like this missile, and I'm not going to be the dick to bring up the AGM-65.
shit... I just did...
fuck.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
HaraSurya In reply to Coffeebean2 [2012-12-15 05:52:13 +0000 UTC]
Hughes made about four or five major missile families that all pretty much look like this - AIM-4 Falcon, AIM-47 Falcon, AIM-26 Falcon, AGM-65 Maverick and AIM-54 Phoenix. I'd just write it off as development from those designs and call it a day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coffeebean2 In reply to HaraSurya [2012-12-15 06:06:38 +0000 UTC]
I already knew about all of those missiles, trust me I do my research! but yea, that missile design is pretty effective, not to mention a missile can't really look much different than they do now, just like the new generation of stealth airplanes, the F-22 and the SU-50, they have to look the way they do or they won't work, that's why people that say that the Russians copy our plane and missiles (SU-50 and the AA-2 Atoll) are idiots, if the SU-50 looked any other way, it wouldn't fucking work. as for the AA-2, a Sidewinder got stuck in a Chinese plane and they copied it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HaraSurya In reply to Coffeebean2 [2012-12-15 06:13:39 +0000 UTC]
Form follows function. I'm sure there's a bit of conscious aesthetic design that goes into military equipment but for the most part it's pure function.
Heck part of why Buran looked so much like the Space Shuttle was simply because the design was the best for mid-1970s technology could make. Heck, I think someone at NASA even joked if the Soviets wanted to actually copy it they'd have given them the blueprints. (Of course that's a scientist talking, not a politician, but still.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coffeebean2 In reply to HaraSurya [2012-12-15 07:38:22 +0000 UTC]
you make a good point with the shuttle thing, never even thought of it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HaraSurya In reply to Coffeebean2 [2012-12-15 08:25:20 +0000 UTC]
Also the AA-2 was such a close copy you could swap parts between it and a Sidewinder and they'd work. They even had things like factory markings copied.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coffeebean2 In reply to HaraSurya [2012-12-15 08:44:05 +0000 UTC]
Just proves the Russians pay attention to detail!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bagera3005 In reply to Coffeebean2 [2012-12-15 05:05:42 +0000 UTC]
name is anther way to say fire bird
👍: 0 ⏩: 0