HOME | DD
Bakhtak — Shadow
#carrie #carriewhite #comic #comics #horror #rachellang #theragecarrie2
Published: 2020-01-11 14:53:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 12009; Favourites: 134; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description
A Carrie White and Rachel Lang comic because I think Rachel deserves some love too <3Not many people seem to know about her existence, nor her movie, which I think is a shame,
because her movie is pretty good and it deals with an important issue as well, so I can highly recommend it.
But keep in mind if you do plan on to watch it, don't expect Carrie to make an appearance, she has nothing to do with the movie
beside being related to Rachel. I think the reason "The Rage: Carrie 2" didn't do well was because it was promoted
as a Carrie movie, instead of a movie of its own. Wish they'd changed the title.
But yeah again I can recommend it.
Carrie and Rachel © Stephen King
Support me on Ko-Fi or commission me
Related content
Comments: 72
This also happened to the Friday the 13th franchise. They were going to a generations of evil sort of deal where the trauma kicks off more people to become the next killer, but Jason became a pop icon.
Movie 4 (Final Chapter) was setting up Tommy to grow up to become a new killer.
Movie 5, put Tommy on hold as the new killer and had another copy cat killer; however it ends in a way implying Tommy was to become the next killer.
However. Jason had become popular and by this time supernatural slashers were replacing regular ones, so instead of making Tommy the killer they just had Jason come back as a zombie and all the Tommy is turning evil, may have killed someone at the end of 5 stuff was swept under the rug.
Its been tried a few times, even the Ring movies went for it, in a lighter fashion, the Sadako 3D movies tried to set up a Sadako clone and daughter of Sadako murder mystery angles but it didn't stick with audiences.
Although of all the "Monster not found" type events the two most off ones in my opinion are Blair Witch 2 and Leprechaun Origins, neither movie really had anything to do with the previous movie(s) and easily/should have just had their own titles. More so Leprechaun origins which had literally zero resemblance even aesthetically to what it was trying to claim to be part of the franchise of. At least Halloween III had the excuse they were trying to be an anthology series and not just banking on the name.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Oh yeah that's true, same happened to that franchise and I agree that Blair Witch 2 is a very weird 'sequel' with little to no connection to the first movie.
Which is why "Blair Witch"/"The Woods" is a more suitable sequel to the cult classic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fun fact; Halloween II was supposed to not be about Michael Myers. The Halloween movies were supposed to be different events that take place on Halloween but are still somewhat connected. Imagine like the Twilight Zone episodes. However, Michael Myers had become so popular and so they made the sequel which is why Michael originally died in the second movie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Still didn't help Halloween III at all. If Michael's story was only in Halloween I then Halloween II & III would've been completely different movies. But once Halloween II continued his story, the fans were only hungry for more even though he was intended to be Dead by the end of Halloween II, it was still a continuation to his story which merely fed into his popularity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah. I do love the Halloween Movies (even if a lot of them suck). I do wonder what it would have been like if they stuck to their original plans on the Halloween series.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The franchise would have been very different. Instead of a franchise about Michael Myers, it would have been a franchise of different Halloween stories.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I would have been a good franchise possibly
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sadly it never came to be.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
the saddest kind of "Monster Not Found"/"Absent Title Star" are the ones that didn't have to be that, they didn't need to use the name recognition to bring in an audience and if anything it hurts their movie.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Awwwwwwwwwwww~! This wins my heart so much, omygosh.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Aaaw I'm happy it does! <'3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah...that film wasn't much more than a knock-off of the first one.
And how could Carrie have made an appearance, anyway? Um, hello! Spoiler alert: she died in the first one!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I won't say it's a knock-off of the first movie.
I guess through flashbacks or as a ghost, or her haunting Rachel's dreams or something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |