HOME | DD

Beavernator In reply to ArkAngel04 [2013-02-13 19:57:04 +0000 UTC]

Thanks; it's a Battlefield 3 reference in case you're wondering.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArkAngel04 In reply to Beavernator [2013-02-14 03:27:44 +0000 UTC]

Ah okay, Never played the Battlefield games. more into RPG's personally.
Nice pic

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MaUPaC1991 In reply to ??? [2013-02-13 13:53:21 +0000 UTC]

Ponies and Battlefield...We´re f@ked

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Beavernator In reply to PokeFire1 [2013-02-13 19:54:17 +0000 UTC]

She's supposed to be a fully-grown mare in this; I guess I accidentally made an optical illusion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Beavernator In reply to Alrevis [2013-02-13 19:48:24 +0000 UTC]

Battlefield 3; a game that stands out in having the most detailed and immersible engine in the world of gaming. It takes a medium-high gaming rig to get the full experience of what Frostbite 2.0 has to offer, and it's awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cheraphy In reply to Beavernator [2013-02-13 23:03:32 +0000 UTC]

I'd beg to differ on the most detailed and immersing engine bit. Maybe in the realm of FPS games, but I have faith Source 3 will fix that... If we ever get it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Beavernator In reply to Cheraphy [2013-02-14 02:44:05 +0000 UTC]

Lol, 3.
Either way, Frostbite 2.0 was very innovative in its graphical aesthetics for its time, sort of like how the Source engine is renowned for ease of modding, economic use of processing power, or in the case of HL1 its unusually advanced physics engine. Comparing the two is like comparing NVidia to AMD.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cheraphy In reply to Beavernator [2014-04-06 20:57:31 +0000 UTC]

I don't see a problem with comparing nVidia to AMD for graphics cards.

But I get what you're saying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0