HOME | DD

Published: 2010-02-17 12:13:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 58104; Favourites: 950; Downloads: 432
Redirect to original
Description
Introduce:In our small city, which was forbidden for visitors cause of military, there is central square. Close to it there is a gates, the enter to the yard. Unfortunetly, the wrong tradition has formed: when the darkness is comming, some of passers are able to use it like a WC.
We tried different ways to prevent it...
So, I've tried to make my own contribution:
Perhaps it will not work, but it might be very funny to look at this action.
UPD. It is not paint on the wall. It is concept idea!
Предистория:
В нашем небольшом, некогда закрытом, городке в самом его центре есть площадь, а возле площади ворота входа во двор. И так уж повелось, что как только на улице темнеет, вот эта вот стена дома автоматически начинает выполнять функцию общественного туалета. И как уж только с этим не боролись…
И даже я попробывал внести вклад в борьбу:
И может люди и не перестанут справлять малую нужду здесь вечером, но зато для стороннего наблюдателя это будет весьма забавным.
Related content
Comments: 169
RainbowGecko [2010-02-18 23:22:08 +0000 UTC]
Are you allowed to draw on the sides of buildings? xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to RainbowGecko [2010-02-19 15:01:20 +0000 UTC]
This is a digital manipulation, not real street art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Ricardo-Rick In reply to IanStruckhoff [2010-02-19 22:46:15 +0000 UTC]
This is not Street Art, It's Digital Art but I still think it should have a DD because It's awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IanStruckhoff In reply to RainbowGecko [2010-02-19 21:58:30 +0000 UTC]
This artwork-- it's a fake.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to RainbowGecko [2010-02-19 22:00:34 +0000 UTC]
It is listed as street art, but it's not real graffiti. It's just a digital edit of a photograph.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Ricardo-Rick In reply to IanStruckhoff [2010-02-19 22:46:53 +0000 UTC]
This is not Street Art, It's Digital Art but I still think it should have a DD because It's awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RainbowGecko In reply to IanStruckhoff [2010-02-19 22:02:20 +0000 UTC]
oh...okay. Well it looks pretty real to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to RainbowGecko [2010-02-19 22:03:02 +0000 UTC]
The artist admitted it elsewhere
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RainbowGecko In reply to IanStruckhoff [2010-02-19 22:16:36 +0000 UTC]
OOOOoooo...Then does that mean it's a secret?
OOOOO you told the secret D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ricardo-Rick In reply to RainbowGecko [2010-02-19 22:46:43 +0000 UTC]
This is not Street Art, It's Digital Art but I still think it should have a DD because It's awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anceylee-Star In reply to ??? [2010-02-18 22:14:09 +0000 UTC]
I like the concept and the execution is nice, but I looked at it zoomed in, and it looks like a photomanipulation, not actual wall graffiti.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sulamith In reply to Anceylee-Star [2010-02-19 11:02:09 +0000 UTC]
this is digital work, not graffiti )
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Ricardo-Rick In reply to sulamith [2010-02-19 22:46:08 +0000 UTC]
This is not Street Art, It's Digital Art but I still think it should have a DD because It's awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sulamith In reply to Ricardo-Rick [2010-02-20 07:50:22 +0000 UTC]
I don't argue against DD on this ))) It's awesome, ya. Just answered your question.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Anceylee-Star In reply to sulamith [2010-02-19 22:35:07 +0000 UTC]
I don't think everyone notices that, though. Otherwise, ya' know, I really like the concept.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
sulamith In reply to Anceylee-Star [2010-02-20 07:53:55 +0000 UTC]
yep )
nice photo-manipulation. but I think author should tell the truth about it commenting his work. don't you think it's rather unfairly to those people who don't understand?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anceylee-Star In reply to sulamith [2010-02-21 00:00:31 +0000 UTC]
Yeah- the description is misleading and since it's put under traditional art, people seem to assume it's real... when it's not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ricardo-Rick In reply to Anceylee-Star [2010-02-19 22:46:03 +0000 UTC]
This is not Street Art, It's Digital Art but I still think it should have a DD because It's awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
VioletVirus In reply to ??? [2010-02-18 21:25:56 +0000 UTC]
Graffiti i tell ya! xD
Lol, this is very beautiful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GraphiteGhost In reply to ??? [2010-02-18 19:57:30 +0000 UTC]
because of the scale of the piece, the space between her fingers is actually quite large by normal human standards. i guess giant women aren't impressed even by a footlong.
..i'm just playin' though. great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
radiantsilverfire [2010-02-18 19:33:11 +0000 UTC]
i didn't get it until i read the authors comment box. epic lol! thanks for the english translation!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nicole-Prince In reply to ??? [2010-02-18 19:26:33 +0000 UTC]
OMG HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FAV FAV FAV
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Prismatic-Prince In reply to ??? [2010-02-18 19:15:11 +0000 UTC]
haha...yes....I hope that when they see her watching they will think about going to the appropriate place to take care of their business.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fisk [2010-02-18 18:58:56 +0000 UTC]
I bet the distance from her thumb and index finger is long enough to make it seem like a compliment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yommytheonly [2010-02-18 18:45:33 +0000 UTC]
you should install a spotlight (you say it´s only a WC at night) and someone with a camera taking photos
i guess this´ll work for at least 100%?
and if not, we´ll have even more to laugh about xDD
your art is great!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Ricardo-Rick In reply to Yommytheonly [2010-02-19 22:45:44 +0000 UTC]
This is not Street Art, It's Digital Art but I still think it should have a DD because It's awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sulamith In reply to Yommytheonly [2010-02-19 11:04:28 +0000 UTC]
what cameras do you speak about? this is digital work )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PureMe00 [2010-02-18 18:34:17 +0000 UTC]
xD this is excellent, and no matter if it works or not it's definitley the most creativ way of trying!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>