HOME | DD

Published: 2008-09-30 05:01:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 13607; Favourites: 160; Downloads: 174
Redirect to original
Description
ok, here we have Sarah Palin in a bikini.I hope she, I mean, McCain wins. I know that 90% of the devaints on her are full blown zombie liberal just doing the usual anti-conservative whatever and I'm sure they are portraying her as a skank or something. Just something different. I can't believe that people were thinking McCain would choose Liberman as his running mate.
Did everyone forget Liberman tried to censor videogames? I guess so.
Anyways, I like Palin, she can skin a moose after she shot it. I'm sure I'll get flamed and stuff by some of the locals for this, but who cares... She's hot.
When I was drawing this, the last picture in my sketch book,(now i need a new one) someone (a cosplayer, I'll explain later) was all, "Why are you drawing her?" With an attitude.
"Because she's hot!" then they asked. "Are you going to vote for her?"
"Of course." I replied.
To think of it, me voting for McCain just because Palin is hot is just as ridiculious as someone else voting for Obama because he's black.
At least I don't feel guilty about it.
*update* my latest Palin drawing here:
[link]
Related content
Comments: 516
Jester-of-the-Clown In reply to ??? [2009-03-15 01:32:20 +0000 UTC]
Are you talking about Palin or Obama?
If you're talking about Obama this is the wrong page, dude ( btw Obama is a she because her wife ripped of "his" balls. Those testes are now toted around in Michelle's purse).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ChrisHolm In reply to ??? [2008-10-03 03:22:42 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, she's cute isn't she! Expect more! Warm-hearted commetns frm folks like you just fuel me on. Drill baby Drill!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Qt75Rx1 In reply to ChrisHolm [2008-10-03 03:40:25 +0000 UTC]
I look forward to the blessed day when America's leaders are decided solely on the basis of looks. Vote Orlando Bloom/Jenna Jameson for 2012!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChrisHolm In reply to Qt75Rx1 [2008-10-04 04:12:10 +0000 UTC]
It's how Clinton won.
(Bill, not the other guy, Hilary.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jester-of-the-Clown In reply to ChrisHolm [2009-03-15 01:30:24 +0000 UTC]
That stopped him cold. That one-liner in the paratheses cracks me up intensely...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Stannite In reply to ??? [2008-10-01 03:24:42 +0000 UTC]
"Drill, Baby, Drill!"
I know exactly what she meant if she was wearing this under that suit of hers.
I will have you know that, if Sarah Palin saw this, she would, quite hypocritically, tell you she loves it.
She loves the attention, using her "hockey mom" status and her 4 month old to make her look like "one of the people". Anyone who has ever MET a hockey mom, let alone lived with one, would know that she would never, EVER leave her children out to dry. She's clearly giving up raising her child carefully in order to play Vice President.
Let me tell you, I *DO* have a general bias, and I am very liberal. Objectively, your drawing is excellent, but it surprises me that you objectify her, emphasizing her body, when one of her main offenses is that the world is too sexist.
Hell, N.O.W. sure isn't backing her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
chesspoly In reply to Stannite [2008-10-06 00:09:33 +0000 UTC]
Actually, I went to the Sarah Palin speech at the home depot center yesterday, and who was the woman who introduced her? Why, it was the life long democrat, president of N.O.W.!!! I think that just exploded in your face. Me:1 You:0 Count it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stannite In reply to chesspoly [2008-10-06 00:35:43 +0000 UTC]
Read:
[link]
[link]
[link]
In your face, sweetheart.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chesspoly In reply to Stannite [2008-10-20 23:25:09 +0000 UTC]
That still doesn't expalain the introduction and all the nice things she said about Palin. Hmm...conflicts inside NOW I suspect. Me:1.5 You:.5. You cant deny what she said and that she was there. If NOW doesn't support her, she had no reason being there and introducing her, yet, there she is. Explain that. NOW is just a bunch of power hungry femanazis...sweetheart.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stannite In reply to chesspoly [2008-10-21 00:27:37 +0000 UTC]
One woman does not represent an entire organization as a whole. Same way one would say that you don't or I don't.
Yes, she was very nice to Ms. Palin. Are you happy? To know that someone was nice to her? Does that appease you, sweetheart. :]
Can't spell "feminists"?
Like I said, one woman who says something nice about your cute little hockey-mom does not represent the organization as a whole.
I bet you couldn't name three standpoints made by NOW in the past five years.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chesspoly In reply to Stannite [2008-10-26 18:59:21 +0000 UTC]
Actually, as a person of authority in NOW, she kinda does represent the organization. It wouldn't be logical if she didn't represent them. Such a liberal PAC. Of course they would support only democratic women. Biased.
Yes, I am very happy. I am appeased.
Feminists. Ha, in your face, sweetheart.
1. Anti-life, pro dead babies.
2. For gay marriage or "equal marriage." California= No on Prop 8
3. "health care is a human right" which is a way for them to justify Socialized medicine.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stannite In reply to chesspoly [2008-10-28 01:05:43 +0000 UTC]
Huh, I thought of you today, interesting.
Good. I'm glad you're appeased.
1. Term: "pro-choice", but yes.
2. Yes, the say no on Prop 8
3. No, they do not state that Health Care is a human right, but that socialized medicine is beneficial in the current state of affairs in which, especially in the western and midwestern areas, health issues like asthma and flu virus are becoming more prominent and increasing in deadly quantities.
Still, two out of three isn't bad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chesspoly In reply to Stannite [2008-10-28 21:02:49 +0000 UTC]
Glad your thinking of me...
OMG, I'm freaking quoting them off their website. They do state that Healthcare IS a human right.
[link] osts=15&
age=1&disp
osts&
aged=3
the august 26th entry. Whats the title of the article? "Health Care is a Human Right!" They even put an exclamation mark at the end. Ha, its two out of three for me. If your gonna stand up for NOW, know what they represent at least. Dont just blindly defend them because then have people like me enjoy provong who wrong you are and we get huge ego boosts and then we walk around like we own the earth, and this world could use less people like me. Simply put, people like you create dicks like me. So just stop defending something that looks like you know little about.
Socialized medicince. Yes, becuase I trust that the government knows how to spend my money better than I do. They know what is good for me better than I know whats good for me. Yes, horray for big government. (actually im broke, but thats beside the point...) See, thats called sarcasm. Think about that some day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stannite In reply to chesspoly [2008-10-28 21:39:19 +0000 UTC]
I was wondering when I would get your next post...
If you're going to cite articles, please read these:
[link]
[link]
[link]
[link] <---statement: NOW does not endorse Sarah Palin
They are related to the subject of health care, and I suggest you read them before you accuse me of blindly speaking.
Your ego doesn't really matter to me. I'm just trying to give you a challenge which you seem to enjoy.
But I disagree, our conflict of interests does NOT mean that there should be less of people like you. : ( You sound like you're giving up. Have I really upset you that much? That was never my intention. Merely to challenge you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chesspoly In reply to Stannite [2008-10-28 22:23:41 +0000 UTC]
If NOW didn't support Palin, they had no right being there at the Palin rally. Why would you go and say all these nice thing about her, yet not support her? According to the articles, she doesnt care about the rights of women, so why be so nice? Officially, they odnt support her and make her look like an anchor to their rights, yet they are the ones introducing her. They need to either 10 stop contradicting themselves 2) keep some of their representatives in check or 3) have NOW stop being so Left wing that they wouldnt support republican women simply because they are republican. They are democratic before they are women it seems.
I live in long beach, and there was a Womens conference at the convention center. Rice was there, so was maria shriver and the governator. chris matthews too. they said some things about palin. tickets were like 220 bucks, but i got in because i know the caterer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stannite In reply to chesspoly [2008-10-28 23:34:46 +0000 UTC]
You can take that up with NOW. They have written in black and white, they do not support Sarah Palin, they endorse Obama and Biden, and they never STATED otherwise. [link]
Now you're contradicting yourself. Is this in the world where you want them to say they don't support Palin, or the one where they stop being so "liberal" and do support her? I do, however, agree that their representative shouldn't have spoken so freely while representing a high position.
Good for you that you know the caterer and you got in. You got to experience the wondrous confusion of politics.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chesspoly In reply to Stannite [2008-10-28 23:44:30 +0000 UTC]
I know they support men to advance the agenda for women. I'm just saying...she should have shut her trap and stayed in her kitchen...where she belongs. Kidding...
When you stop looking at yourself as a woman, but as an American...then things will be better. But Dems. and NOW wants us to see differences. Screw NOW...I think Ive made my point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stannite In reply to chesspoly [2008-10-29 00:31:35 +0000 UTC]
Well, of course. If women should advance their agenda, shouldn't men too?
Shut up. xD
I'm not American. I just came here not too long ago from Wales. I know a lot about the history and current events, but I am waiting to become an actual citizen.
As for NOW, you made your point that you:
-Dislike how they led you to believe they endorse Palin
-Do not exercise totalitarian restraint on one woman.
But now you've added Democrats for the first time. Not all democrats support NOW.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ChrisHolm In reply to Stannite [2008-10-01 22:49:30 +0000 UTC]
I think she'd like it because she is portaryed in a heroic manner. Like Washington crossing that river.
I don't see how she is leaving her children out to dry. Sure they show up for photo ops, but so does Obama's kids. It's not like she abandoned them, perhaps I should say, "Aborted" LOL! She's giving up as much as the next mother who works 2 jobs and attends college to make a better life for her kids.
And don't you think it's sick how the media would attack her 4 month old with down syndrom? Of course if she were a lib, that child wouldn't be a "problem" because it would have been aborted.
And besides, I don't know where she said that the world is sexist. I think you are confusing the story Katy Couric did for Hillary.(but if you do know where she said that, post a link to the story so I can check it out myself, thanks.) She's as objectified as any sports figure selling a sports drink.
But that was sort of the point and I'm glad you picked up on that. I'm glad that N.O.W. doesn't support her, because if they did, I know I wouldn't. Palin doesn't fit the mold of a "strong" woman by liberal standards. And I'm glad of that. This Woman's strength isn't in her need to be liked or approved of. Celebs who have never even heard of her have grown to hate her within the 2 or 3 months she's been out there. I'm glad to see liberals attack her so feverishly, it shows us what they are really made of, and it isn't pretty.
The only other woman in politics with as much awesomeness as Palin, would be Connie Rice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
DarthRoden In reply to ChrisHolm [2008-10-07 04:12:45 +0000 UTC]
I agree, Sarah Palin...er I mean McCain in 08!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Stannite In reply to ChrisHolm [2008-10-02 05:07:28 +0000 UTC]
...In a bikini... Real heroic.
There is an essential connection with mother an infant, and although I'm not saying women belong in the house, for a child to be raised without the emotional connection of his or her mother at all times, it can lead to serious social/mental instability. I know, I hate that statement, but I'd be very surprised if you would deny that connection between mother an child.
Not all liberals abort their children, and many conservatives do. I'm sorry you're against abortion, but I won't challenge your beliefs simply because my own differ.
And it's not about publicity, who shows up for photo shoots, it's about the children themselves. From a humanist perspective, the whole point of life is to live it. I think you might agree with that, correct? Say your wife just gave birth four months ago, and is now leaving you to raise that child 12-14 hours of the day while she's at her job. It's not easy, and that child, specifically during it's Oral Stage [if you believe in Freud's and Neofreudian theories] will be raised with their mother gone for almost two thirds of the day.
You're really ok with that? Frankly, I might have supported her if she didn't choose to leave her four month old infant for 66% of the day, every day, in order to campaign and [in her hopes, as well as many] assist to govern a country.
As for sexism, I'm sure you could find numerous clips on youtube of her "combatting sexism". But be careful of your sources, most-> all are sexist.
You're objectifying her because of her body. You increase the bust, tighten her abs, and put her in a skimpy bikini--you made her a common sex object based on your own desires.
You know, I'm trying very hard to listen and accept your opinions and statements. But you need to realize that there is a very thin line between opinion and bigotry.
As for celebs, they don't think. As they hold a very influential power on American minds, their statements are taken for intrinsic value. Many are bought out or simply show favoritism to boost their own fanclub. If you only pay attention to celebs, you obviously don't pay attention to the right media. You should be picking apart EVERY single detail that EACH politician says. Not just what the ones you like or dislike say.
Have an open mind. It won't be easy, but it's worth it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ultrixcrow In reply to Stannite [2008-10-02 22:13:43 +0000 UTC]
Jeeze... I kind of had a feeling this drawing would bring this kind of attention, great pic btw. Are you still thinking about attending Oni-Con now thats its been moved to December?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Stannite In reply to ultrixcrow [2008-10-02 22:42:27 +0000 UTC]
Did you mean to send this to the artist? Because I don't know if he got it. I did tho.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ultrixcrow In reply to ultrixcrow [2008-10-02 22:26:39 +0000 UTC]
Oh, btw you gotta see An American Carol, David Zucker as the director is gonna be mighty good fun. XD Airplane & The Naked Gun anyone? ^-^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
VashUG In reply to ??? [2008-10-01 02:47:08 +0000 UTC]
HA! i was so waiting for this from you, your into the political stuff and you like to draw hot chicks XD very sexy palin i agree tho for a political soccer mom shes damn fine XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChrisHolm In reply to VashUG [2008-10-01 23:04:09 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I need to make more. I hope she, I mean, McCain wins. Then I can draw even more and sell them at conventions. Come on Palin, daddy needs a new Jaguar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VashUG In reply to ChrisHolm [2008-10-02 02:22:33 +0000 UTC]
lol you mind if i show this to the guys at undeadgames.com? they'res a discussion on the elections and people keep mentioning how hot palin is lol this would be perfect to post there ill give you full credit
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dwilesjr In reply to ??? [2008-09-30 07:17:43 +0000 UTC]
thats a fine fine likeness of Sarah Palin good sir excellent work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DoctorBollocks In reply to ??? [2008-09-30 05:05:31 +0000 UTC]
I agree fullheartedly, very well done....also this picture just rocks
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Secretservicedentist In reply to ??? [2008-09-30 05:01:39 +0000 UTC]
Yeehaw! Git R' Done! America! USA! USA!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |