HOME | DD

Code-Shark — Yes, That's A Booty.

#nera #oc #amenii #anthro #anthropomorphic #booty #bootylicious #comic #diseny #furry #furryfemale #girls #lesbian #lovers #origianalcharacter #panties #pinup #predator #prey #romance #sexy #undies #women #zootopia #sexybeautiful #sizedifference #legsstockings #size_difference #zootopia_disney #zootopiadisney #zootropolis #zootopia_fanart #prey_vs_predator #ameniixnera
Published: 2016-12-30 01:30:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 4254; Favourites: 139; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description C.S. Notes: This is what I had originally planed on drawing, as looking back I realized I had never drawn Nera's Posterior in color before.

This whole thing was partially spurred by the a long-ago session of D&D – nut shell recap: Our party is trying to escape an orc stronghold in the dead of night, all we have is the moon light to navigate with.

I being a dark elf, Anessa, have no problem seeing in the dark. The rest of our party is pretty much blind as a bats. As I try to guide them through the orc ridden camp, while they continue to fail their perception checks, our Barbarian manages to roll a natural 20!

GM: So, what do you want to perceive?

Barbarian: I ogle Da’ Booty!

GM: …

Barbarian: Well what do I see?

GM: Da Booty Glows majestically in the moonlight, its curves gently flex and relax with each stride. It’s heavenly symmetry, and orb like beauty is like that of polished back agates, in a sea of blue light. (He when on like this for almost a minute strait.)

From this point on Anessa’s booty was treated as a sentient character, and the GM even made me roll check to see if my booty would pass.

Related content
Comments: 71

Code-Shark In reply to ??? [2017-01-12 16:49:48 +0000 UTC]

A shame, the group I was with we had several teams of characters. This was due to our short life expectancies more so than anything else.

The strange things that happened.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pedroroll In reply to Code-Shark [2017-01-12 16:51:30 +0000 UTC]

I guess that group in specific never played again due the loss... as far as i know the wizard and the barbarian where 4 or 5yo characters

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Code-Shark In reply to Pedroroll [2017-01-13 13:07:59 +0000 UTC]

O.o ouch. That's a bad loss.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pedroroll In reply to Code-Shark [2017-01-13 21:40:28 +0000 UTC]

I guess... That's why I played VtM instead of D&D... XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Code-Shark In reply to Pedroroll [2017-01-14 09:49:20 +0000 UTC]

V&M? Way to many acronyms T.T

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pedroroll In reply to Code-Shark [2017-01-14 15:22:50 +0000 UTC]

Vampire The masquerade... Sorry XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Code-Shark In reply to Pedroroll [2017-01-15 20:39:41 +0000 UTC]

Ah, I know of this one, but never got to play, much to my regret.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

db1993 In reply to ??? [2016-12-30 01:53:16 +0000 UTC]

Indeed:3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Code-Shark In reply to db1993 [2016-12-30 09:11:12 +0000 UTC]

Lol! So it is, completely changes the view of the piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

db1993 In reply to Code-Shark [2016-12-30 15:17:55 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, how it going?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Code-Shark In reply to db1993 [2017-01-03 19:18:37 +0000 UTC]

Like a tarantula through a cupcake, you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

db1993 In reply to Code-Shark [2017-01-03 19:20:47 +0000 UTC]

I am fine, just made some instant ramen noodles.  "A tarantula through a cupcake"? What

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Code-Shark In reply to db1993 [2017-01-03 19:22:59 +0000 UTC]

Thats how my day has been, kinda funny, kinda busy, a little hairy, and anyone who sees you just stares wondering WTH...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

db1993 In reply to Code-Shark [2017-01-03 19:29:07 +0000 UTC]

Oh, okay then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LostandFounding In reply to ??? [2016-12-30 01:43:50 +0000 UTC]

Can't...decide...which...I... like....more....  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Code-Shark In reply to LostandFounding [2016-12-30 09:11:54 +0000 UTC]

Lol! Two bootys two eyes, one for each

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LostandFounding In reply to Code-Shark [2016-12-30 15:14:49 +0000 UTC]

OH! Perfect! ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JackAxeWell [2016-12-30 01:37:41 +0000 UTC]

Without a doubt

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Code-Shark In reply to JackAxeWell [2016-12-30 09:12:44 +0000 UTC]

An you are very perceptive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackAxeWell In reply to Code-Shark [2016-12-30 20:51:39 +0000 UTC]

Quite.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |