HOME | DD

Published: 2007-03-21 10:49:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 74451; Favourites: 2054; Downloads: 1311
Redirect to original
Description
My commentaryRelated content
Comments: 946
kmkl In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 15:27:34 +0000 UTC]
i actually saw the sign first. then looked for other elements relating to composition, then saw dem!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The-Lady-Blue In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 15:26:35 +0000 UTC]
I... um... yes. Composition. That's what I was looking at. The composition!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Elementalist-1 In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 15:25:51 +0000 UTC]
XD I noticed the sign, then the fact there was a lady.
Win!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hell-okitty In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 15:10:04 +0000 UTC]
what a wonderful artistic community we all are active on.
i've seen photos like this before, but I think this is the first one that has addressed the hilarious fact boob photos - mainly BAD boob photos, get complimented on their composition, well done.
I don't know why shallow people try and come off as artistic, then I guess some don't, ive seen "great tits!" comments as well, I don't know whats worse.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColinPortfolio In reply to Hell-okitty [2008-05-17 19:53:20 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much.
(just waiting for the "nice eyes" comments)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hell-okitty In reply to ColinPortfolio [2008-05-17 20:02:39 +0000 UTC]
LOL.
well, the general IQ of members of this site is pretty low, so I wouldn't be surprised!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
StranaMente In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 15:09:31 +0000 UTC]
How can we forget to talk about the lighting, the focus, the contrast?
:-D
Great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SBoggart In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 15:08:18 +0000 UTC]
Hahaha. Love the sarcasm. Way to give the porn-seekers the backhand.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
robdevaan In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 15:02:49 +0000 UTC]
Funny thing is, although this has a message and is intended sarcastically, it did, ultimately, get featured because of the boobs.
Or would this have been featured if it didn't include the boobs? It wouldn't have been humours without them, so probably not.
Unintended, featuring this picture actual confirms the rule and reinforces the 'sad truth'.
Or doesn't it? Questions, questions...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColinPortfolio In reply to robdevaan [2008-05-17 20:20:17 +0000 UTC]
I feel like a computer that is about to blow a fuse after Captain Kirk talks to it....... hahaha
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngryToast101 In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 15:01:54 +0000 UTC]
lol, i laughed so hard when i saw this. Nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dreamweb55 In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 15:00:50 +0000 UTC]
Very sincere concept
It's really what's all about in at least 95% of photos of this type, and that's -->
And isn't it funny when something "artistic" as this (just without the panel receives about 12319381 comments like:
"The lighting is great as it matches the colour of her eyes. The tiles in the background give real depth to the entire composition, and the stairs are there as a symbol of something that's rising up to it's potential/reaching higher goals. The cropping of the panel where the text is , is excellent. It gives us impression that more lines of text are written below, just that we don't see them, therefore the artist is leaving something to our imagination."
And congrats on the DD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColinPortfolio In reply to dreamweb55 [2008-05-19 06:58:16 +0000 UTC]
Hahaha, really like reading your "comments like"
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kelpthecrapcreator In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 14:58:46 +0000 UTC]
Gosh. What wonderful, um, composition.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TransparentDream In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 14:58:24 +0000 UTC]
really, it should say noticed for it's "content" not composition, because composition is how everything is layed out within the frame, not the actual content of the frame...
but i still get your point, and i like it. just thought i'd put in my two cents.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hell-okitty In reply to TransparentDream [2008-05-17 15:06:46 +0000 UTC]
thats the point. people only look at photos like that for the "content" but comment about how wonderful the composition is, when all they are really looking at is the boobs.
its irony.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Darkdesyre In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 14:58:01 +0000 UTC]
Sad but true commentary. As a graphic artist for over ten years, I was so tired of doing "sex sells" type of ads and yearned for something more meaningful and that represented women as something more then sexual. So I became a fine artist! Grats on the DD hun!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
n4bi1 In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 14:53:05 +0000 UTC]
Make a high res wallpaper version of this - it'd make an excellent wallpaper!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MarkDobson In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 14:47:43 +0000 UTC]
Oh I feel so ashamed... I'll, er, just wallow in my shame for a couple more minutes...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dreichet In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 14:43:47 +0000 UTC]
Sigh.. this picture makes me feel so predictable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RenderedHelpless In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 14:39:20 +0000 UTC]
Nothing to see here, move along >.>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RenderedHelpless In reply to ColinPortfolio [2008-05-20 10:22:14 +0000 UTC]
But.... these aren't the droids you're looking for...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColinPortfolio In reply to RenderedHelpless [2008-05-20 18:26:43 +0000 UTC]
These aren't the droids we're looking for... move along, move along.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ColinPortfolio In reply to ab-Josh [2008-05-17 20:45:23 +0000 UTC]
Missed the message I guess...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Robsonnet In reply to ??? [2008-05-17 13:46:32 +0000 UTC]
I'm just faving it because it is the first thing I've seen today where its isn't misspelled.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>