HOME | DD

DavidCraigEllis β€” Dark Poppies

#landscape #landscapephotography #photography #poppies
Published: 2008-06-29 23:03:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 21317; Favourites: 1359; Downloads: 5
Redirect to original
Description Second RAW conversion with Lightroom - taken this afternoon (June 2008)

+ Re-edit March 2010 , reduction in saturation and smoothing of levels to reduce clipping in sky & neatimage +
+Re-edit Feb 2011 sharpened+
+Re-edit April 2011 whitebalance altered+








Related content

DavidCraigEllis - Dark Buttercups

DavidCraigEllis - Infrared at Dusk

DavidCraigEllis - Rapeseed II [DD]

DavidCraigEllis - .: Times Like These II :.

DavidCraigEllis - Bosbury Infrascape

DavidCraigEllis - .: Summers Glory :.

DavidCraigEllis - .: Vertigo :. [DD]

DavidCraigEllis - Ruby Jewel 10

DavidCraigEllis - Herefordshire New Skies 3

DavidCraigEllis - .: Vertigo :. [DD]

DavidCraigEllis - .: Times Like These II :.

DavidCraigEllis - Rapeseed II [DD]

DavidCraigEllis - Bosbury Infrascape

DavidCraigEllis - Infrared at Dusk

areaBlue - The Danube

Morgo - Trifels

LizDarkcroft - The Smallest Thing That Didn't Fall

FROZENAMOMENT - Una Mattina 3

SecretForestPath - Golden Wheat

Laura-B-R - Beautiful Continent - Franconia

AnPhoTon - 002

sorny - Sunflowers

MartenD - ...red weed...

Muenzmann - ambush

SchwarzWieEbenholZ - Just a Glimpse

KarelSopek - Golden Hour Companions
Comments: 313

DavidCraigEllis In reply to ??? [2010-03-14 18:47:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yamiyalo In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-03-21 10:44:22 +0000 UTC]

you are very welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zootnik [2010-03-14 17:18:34 +0000 UTC]

Oh I like this one....I also would like to see Sorny's suggestion too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to zootnik [2010-03-14 18:47:08 +0000 UTC]

Thanks , working on a new version but things arent coming out right yet

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sorny In reply to ??? [2010-03-11 18:04:44 +0000 UTC]

dave, i got a nice idea for this one:
Desaturate everything except the red flowers, would look outstanding ;D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to sorny [2010-03-12 09:30:32 +0000 UTC]

like that idea - I may not change this version as it has about 1000 but i might make a second version

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LaMusaTriste In reply to ??? [2010-03-11 14:14:16 +0000 UTC]

wunderschΓΆn!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to LaMusaTriste [2010-03-11 14:49:10 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Carmen

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

L0ne In reply to ??? [2010-02-02 16:26:01 +0000 UTC]

Featured in S K Y collection: [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to L0ne [2010-02-13 20:14:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks again and sorry for such a very late reply

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zootnik [2010-01-11 20:46:24 +0000 UTC]

I really like this photo

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to zootnik [2010-01-16 01:22:56 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chopen [2010-01-11 10:22:00 +0000 UTC]

Great shot Dave! I have a feeling it's slightly tilted to the right though. (left side higher than the right side)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to Chopen [2010-01-13 17:06:55 +0000 UTC]

Several people have said this and i think it looks slanted as well ..... but... I've checked it (3 or 4 times ) and it is actually straight. I think its something to do with the treeline or maybe the angle the coulds are approaching from that tricks the eye (?)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Chopen In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-01-15 21:17:56 +0000 UTC]

Haha great optical illusion then. It's a great shot whether it's tilted or not

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

holzoepfael In reply to ??? [2010-01-03 23:08:43 +0000 UTC]

beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to holzoepfael [2010-01-05 23:36:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

holzoepfael In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2010-01-05 23:40:35 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dndnma [2009-11-30 01:31:14 +0000 UTC]

u have been featured here [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to dndnma [2009-12-03 22:37:32 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

baileyjocko In reply to ??? [2009-11-14 23:11:09 +0000 UTC]

this is amazing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to baileyjocko [2009-11-20 19:13:22 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hortley In reply to ??? [2009-11-11 22:46:35 +0000 UTC]

may i use it on Ponybox too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HorsesRule8 In reply to ??? [2009-10-05 23:43:23 +0000 UTC]

hi:

May I use this for a horse manip that I am working on? Also on this site: [link] ?
I will fully criedt you and show you the finish product.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to HorsesRule8 [2009-10-07 23:07:10 +0000 UTC]

Hi,

Youre more than welcome, look forward to seeing the end result

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nannook1 In reply to ??? [2009-07-08 21:24:29 +0000 UTC]

i love the sky

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fussel2112 In reply to ??? [2009-07-05 06:11:55 +0000 UTC]

wow! this looks so beautiful! love the dark tones!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SoChic28 [2009-06-22 17:29:14 +0000 UTC]

your work has been featured in my journal: [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

corrasion In reply to ??? [2009-06-22 05:21:53 +0000 UTC]

this is beautiful. looks like a storm was coming

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CristinaN In reply to ??? [2009-06-13 16:52:13 +0000 UTC]

i used it here.
[link]

thank you so much!
great gallery.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

paintitwithcoffee In reply to ??? [2009-05-29 13:30:06 +0000 UTC]

so beautiful! I want it as wallpaper

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FRANDIGAR In reply to ??? [2009-05-27 23:28:58 +0000 UTC]

This wonderful landscape was feature here!! [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

recepgulec In reply to ??? [2009-05-24 13:58:47 +0000 UTC]

featured: [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to recepgulec [2009-05-26 18:51:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DimensionSeven In reply to ??? [2009-05-11 05:59:04 +0000 UTC]

(was the clipping of the sky intentional? I'd preferr it without it. let's see how the 1st version was... )

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to DimensionSeven [2009-05-14 18:55:03 +0000 UTC]

Excuse my ignorance what do you mean by 'clipping'? I dont know the term

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2009-05-14 19:54:56 +0000 UTC]

Clipping of highlights: loss of details because of overexposure of some parts of the photo.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to DimensionSeven [2009-05-14 20:56:21 +0000 UTC]

Gotcha , this was (I think) only the second shot I proccessed when I first got my hands on Lightroom - theres probably a lot of room for improvement but because its my most popular deviation i've left it alone

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JoX1989 In reply to ??? [2009-04-28 14:25:06 +0000 UTC]

Hi!
You've been featured on my news article about Squared Photos!
Hope you like it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to JoX1989 [2009-05-03 23:30:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mivvv [2009-04-26 11:02:23 +0000 UTC]

just awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to mivvv [2009-05-02 20:56:18 +0000 UTC]

Mucho Thanks , and sorry for such a late reply

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mivvv In reply to DavidCraigEllis [2009-05-02 21:59:06 +0000 UTC]

No problem
and my pleasure

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ambyon [2009-04-17 14:28:48 +0000 UTC]

Featured : link

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to Ambyon [2009-04-23 09:16:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ulkeraydogmus [2009-04-14 09:43:58 +0000 UTC]

thanks.beatΔ±ful pΔ±cture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to ulkeraydogmus [2009-04-14 21:25:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

muffinbanana In reply to ??? [2009-04-08 11:26:21 +0000 UTC]

Wow. Just Wow. (: I love the red.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidCraigEllis In reply to muffinbanana [2009-04-10 15:20:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks alot MuffinB' , much appreciated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pirateladyinmaine In reply to ??? [2009-04-08 11:22:13 +0000 UTC]

I can see why Damien (the crazy man) recommended you.You are fantastic!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2


<= Prev | | Next =>