HOME | DD

designerscouch — dC's Logo Design

Published: 2006-12-08 14:33:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 81730; Favourites: 761; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Behold, dC's Logo Design...
This design was done by =russoturisto exclusively for *designerscouch on request by ^depthskins .

dC is a group made up of designers both amateur and pro in which all of us have our own style and preference. A club dedicated to design whether it be web, print or identity. However much we're different as individuals, we all design in a modern style whether it be simple or graphic, it's modern.

=russoturisto did an excellent job at capturing this about dC in his typographic logos. It's obviously modern and trendy but yet has this old school feel to it. It's professional and simple but not corporate professional because we're not corporate. While being simple, it's graphic.

We're all different, we're all individuals but with this design, there's something to relate to we hope. Something in the logo that makes you go w0w.

We would love to hear your opinons on this logo design for dC because as you know, we like to have you play a role in the certain factors about dC.

Many thanks to =russoturisto for pulling this off. It took him approx a week to pull this off in which he worked with ^depthskins asking questions, etc, etc about dC. So go on over to his page, show some love and fave it over there as well to show appreciation.

Another small step towards what's to come for dC.
Related content
Comments: 133

WmozartA [2007-08-26 14:56:52 +0000 UTC]

good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lasttear [2007-08-21 12:26:12 +0000 UTC]

good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hysterykal [2007-08-11 00:28:00 +0000 UTC]

i love it: the texture, colors, text, everything

awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

msrjharn [2007-08-01 15:14:39 +0000 UTC]

very nice.. great job by the way

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MysteryofAlbesila [2007-07-23 23:49:59 +0000 UTC]

Great work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Demaun [2007-07-15 01:03:07 +0000 UTC]

That's friggin awesome man

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Demaun In reply to Demaun [2007-07-15 01:06:49 +0000 UTC]

and actually, that WOULD make a good T-shirt, just throw in some vector ink splots on it & screen print either red or white on black and it would look awesome...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

vanmall [2007-07-04 07:26:20 +0000 UTC]

Nice old looking design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

musicdor [2007-06-23 22:51:55 +0000 UTC]

texture master...great !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tornandweathered [2007-05-23 08:57:30 +0000 UTC]

wow!!! that all i can say... wow!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ire-desing [2007-05-11 04:20:51 +0000 UTC]

Good job !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

genarch [2007-04-13 03:29:55 +0000 UTC]

beautiful texture..love the stains and color wash. cheers

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eferna [2007-03-28 07:26:32 +0000 UTC]

wow, nice that is a really nice job u did there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

emotioner [2007-03-17 14:56:44 +0000 UTC]

th th thet's g g g g g great

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

delink [2007-02-26 09:42:47 +0000 UTC]

this is fuckinggggggggg great man....... i love it........wow

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Axumis [2007-02-19 10:52:48 +0000 UTC]

holy crap, this was the random deviation that came up, and i was only looking at this a second ago...

conspiracy

VERY nice logo though, I love it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mac87 [2007-02-14 02:07:57 +0000 UTC]

jealous
super nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mi2oon [2007-02-13 23:24:31 +0000 UTC]

Quite eye boggling.. super work *hats off*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

intelnode [2007-02-13 09:59:12 +0000 UTC]

rofl the guy who created got suspended, looks like a cd cover .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

notoriousfx [2007-02-11 09:13:06 +0000 UTC]

thats awsome, favorited

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fearghost [2007-02-10 19:59:56 +0000 UTC]

love the logo

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

d3up [2007-02-10 19:29:18 +0000 UTC]

Very creative, I liked!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kamazzz [2007-02-10 13:07:47 +0000 UTC]

This is nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NDroid [2007-02-02 17:49:38 +0000 UTC]

looks very stylish.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

feritkirikci [2007-01-28 23:01:04 +0000 UTC]

nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TonyDennison [2007-01-15 18:07:32 +0000 UTC]

This rocks! I want a t-shirt!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

todoroki [2007-01-08 10:30:53 +0000 UTC]

lovely....
nice grunge.....

let see my gallery:
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Trippin13 [2007-01-04 14:58:18 +0000 UTC]

nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pspthemes [2006-12-30 21:10:32 +0000 UTC]

nice design but i see an error (if its an error that is ) .. in the miniature logo at the left there are some letters with color fill in em , i dont know if thats in purpose , but it looks a little strange
but it may be the plan

but its a cool and well done design !

cheers from =mangatobbey
Founder of =pspthemes

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

convex7 [2006-12-17 19:32:34 +0000 UTC]

Now that is AMAZING!!!!!! Just perfect!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

marvnation [2006-12-17 12:22:01 +0000 UTC]

thats awesome crazy shitz

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tipp-p [2006-12-17 11:04:50 +0000 UTC]

love this !!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

J3K [2006-12-13 13:20:49 +0000 UTC]

nice job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

itt23 [2006-12-12 12:08:51 +0000 UTC]

great logo

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Concept-X [2006-12-11 02:22:06 +0000 UTC]

looks nice, nice job.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ironhacker [2006-12-10 09:49:19 +0000 UTC]

definitely not...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ivanbatuska [2006-12-09 14:22:49 +0000 UTC]

very nice !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dagorath [2006-12-09 13:28:26 +0000 UTC]

Rather kickass....the logo, when not fully loaded, resembles the dA icon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sonars [2006-12-09 12:27:23 +0000 UTC]

sick! i love it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

russoturisto [2006-12-09 03:02:46 +0000 UTC]

ha ha i fav it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nedw [2006-12-09 02:23:15 +0000 UTC]

sweet aesthetics.. very cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chaotic-Harmony [2006-12-09 01:13:19 +0000 UTC]

That is an amazing logo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sekka [2006-12-08 22:27:22 +0000 UTC]

I love it. Bring on the future.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Benijamino [2006-12-08 22:20:16 +0000 UTC]

really amazing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

johnston [2006-12-08 22:05:20 +0000 UTC]

it's very hard to read.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TumanT [2006-12-08 22:03:58 +0000 UTC]

russoturisto rullz again! congrats to depthskins, great pick.
The logo kick ass begining with the typing all the way to the final overall shape.

not so sure about the background texture tho.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ViNz- [2006-12-08 21:56:48 +0000 UTC]

Sweet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cberry240 [2006-12-08 20:44:18 +0000 UTC]

Taking away all the fluff that's in this and looking at the 'logo' itself there are a few problems.

First, again and as always it's hard to read. That's only multiplied when it's reduced down just look at the little B/W version you have there. Not to mention that the type underneath is completely unreadable. The DC above the name doesn't read like it does when larger cause the space in the C closes. This also looks too similar to the dA logo and looks like you squished the dA logo at first glance.

Second, why repeat Designers Couch under the logo. If the logo was legible you wouldn't need that and one could simple read the logo and then the 'tagline' which is "community of unknown creative humans" (BTW I'm not a copywriter but the word humans is odd people sound or individuals sounds better).

Third, the decorative elements forming from the letters are also a distraction and disapper when reduced like in the B/W version.

It looks nice and everyone seems to like it but it is far from a working logo. There is such a thing as 'over designing' and this is an example. Generally less is more.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

depthskins In reply to cberry240 [2006-12-08 23:03:55 +0000 UTC]

First thing: Readable? Not all logo types are meant to be readable good sir, it's more iconic and visual but yet you can see 'designers couch' in it. Since that's the case...

That answers your second statement as to why there's designer's couch at the bottom. It's to reinforce the name for those who can't "read" the logo-type.

The decorative elements would be pretty visible at a small size but then again, I can't say for sure and neither can you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cberry240 In reply to depthskins [2006-12-09 00:33:39 +0000 UTC]

Another thing I noticed...why is the gap between the U and the tail of the G larger than the space between the letters themselves.

If it's mean to be iconic and visual than you're in a whole different world. In that case looking at it as a shape what is it? The shape isn't bold or unique it's a mass of stuff. It doesn't have a concept behind it.

You can pretty much tell for sure if the logo and decorative elements are going to read or not simply by looking at the small black version that's off on the left. The detail doesn't register at all.

It makes no sense to repeat the name of a logo underneath it if you're using the type treament (even custom) as the logo That's just making the read that much longer cause there is more to process. I'm not saying you and everyone else can't like.

This is all my opinion based I know and have seen. Keep in mind I've based all my comments off the little black version of the logo on the left side trying to see it at what could be the smallest size and the without the fancy effects.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>