HOME | DD

dragoon86 — Dracomar Of Asguard

Published: 2009-03-07 09:26:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 7049; Favourites: 138; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description here is the character suggested to me sometime ago(sorry it has been delayed so much due to my immense workload) , although there are thing that aren't able to implement in the picture, but more or less is as close as can it be.

btw the anti-gravitational wing have two mode, one is flight mode(as show in the front wing) and booster mode(the wing behind as shown)

anyway i have a great time dealing with this picture/pose/colouring etc... >w
hope you all enjoy it

quote from

Name: Dracomar
Age: 20
Gender: male
Height: 200 cm
Description: A full-blooded dragon. Has orange scales, wears a set of blue bands on his arms and legs, as well as a pair of pants (he wears the bands over the pants, of course), carries a hand-and-a-half longsword he calls Aircutter, and has a pair of antigravity-mechanical wings (fashioned for him by his uncle on his stepmother's side, an eccentric half-blood inventor), as he lost his natural wings in an accident when he was a baby. His parents did not abandon him, however, rather they brought him up with care, in order for him to become a Knight, rather than a rogue, like his elder brother became.
Notes: Respects both Slith and Alisa as fellow warriors, and knows Alisa's problems, having lost his own wings.
Is very skilled with his sword, having trained with similar weapons since childhood.
Will pick up and use a variety of weapons. However, he dislikes poison, and will avoid it if at all possible.
He forged Aircutter himself when aged 18, with guidance from a master blacksmith. As such, a small amount of his essence is hidden within the blade, and it will not break nor dull as long as his will remains firm. It can launch a lance of fire at Dracomar's command.
Dracomar can breath fire, but rarely has reason to do so. However, he never carries flint or tinder; he doesn't need it.

Artwork by
Related content
Comments: 65

dragoon86 In reply to ??? [2009-03-09 03:23:54 +0000 UTC]

what "ambidextrous"?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arratra In reply to dragoon86 [2009-03-09 10:12:55 +0000 UTC]

A person who is ambidextrous can use both hands equally well in most tasks. It can sometimes lead to problems, and they're slightly more common than most people think (I myself thought I was right handed until high school).

Of course, some swordsmen can use their swords equally well in either hand, despite the fact that they aren't ambidextrous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dragoon86 In reply to Arratra [2009-03-12 04:33:06 +0000 UTC]

yeah..that sound good... imagination you can use acrobatic move with the sword exchanging with either hand in between.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arratra In reply to dragoon86 [2009-03-13 03:55:42 +0000 UTC]

I figured out a move where you perform a slash while switching hands, but that would only work in a competition of style; I doubt it would be practical in combat.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dragoon86 In reply to Arratra [2009-03-13 05:30:49 +0000 UTC]

well, if you keep switching hand, enemy has a hard time figuring your move

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arratra In reply to dragoon86 [2009-03-14 01:48:09 +0000 UTC]

And if your opponent isn't expecting a left-handed attack, they're not likely to be able to block as easily.

Also, being able to wield a sword in either hand eliminates the weakness of your off hand.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dragoon86 In reply to Arratra [2009-03-14 15:08:39 +0000 UTC]

well he can wield his sword with his tail if he so wanted

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arratra In reply to dragoon86 [2009-03-15 09:07:46 +0000 UTC]

He wouldn't. That would just be awkward. But still, that's true.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dragoon86 In reply to Arratra [2009-03-16 06:01:14 +0000 UTC]

maybe good for throwing dagger

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arratra In reply to dragoon86 [2009-03-19 07:13:42 +0000 UTC]

How would he aim?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dragoon86 In reply to Arratra [2009-03-19 14:44:59 +0000 UTC]

just flung it at enemy?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arratra In reply to dragoon86 [2009-03-24 03:31:12 +0000 UTC]

He'd miss more often than not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dragoon86 In reply to Arratra [2009-03-24 04:30:31 +0000 UTC]

at least it a distraction

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arratra In reply to dragoon86 [2009-03-26 04:49:06 +0000 UTC]

True.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |