HOME | DD

Epifex β€” Three's a Crowd by-nc-sa

Published: 2013-02-23 22:10:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 167605; Favourites: 1457; Downloads: 135
Redirect to original
Description "Will the owner of the Dugtrio in the waiting room kindly return it to its PokΓ©ball? It's destroying the floor tiles."


I used a different style of shading for this one to usual. I think it turned out pretty good. What do you think?
Related content
Comments: 127

Blake-Shade In reply to ??? [2013-05-11 19:36:33 +0000 UTC]

YEAH! diglett.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jinolu [2013-04-13 06:54:14 +0000 UTC]

Life sucks XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheScalene [2013-03-29 21:16:30 +0000 UTC]

What about Dugtrio? 3 brains?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

julian0123 [2013-03-29 20:00:43 +0000 UTC]

Sure, Maneton...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FoolishLittleMortal In reply to ??? [2013-03-29 19:45:30 +0000 UTC]

lol So true.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MyGambit [2013-03-29 04:27:31 +0000 UTC]

"Sir get that Dudrio to calm down. Same to you Ms. with the Hydreigon! If I have to tell that kid to put away that Executor again there shall be hell to pay." . . But multiple pokemon posing as one not allowed.

Pokemon.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MrsVolv In reply to MyGambit [2013-11-26 14:22:03 +0000 UTC]

well Executor is more or less one thing but Eggxecute... come on! they are completely separated, moving independently xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AssaultFlamingo In reply to ??? [2013-03-15 18:41:03 +0000 UTC]

Genesect's a different but somewhat parallel case. They didn't just ressurrect an ancient PokΓ©mon or manipulate its DNA. They didn't just give it a fully artificial exoskeleton. They strapped a FUCKING CANNON to its back and called it a day.

Why can't I just add an assault rifle to my Pikachu with some tape and use it? :V

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

me12345678 In reply to AssaultFlamingo [2014-08-17 23:06:00 +0000 UTC]

Genesect already had the cannon; Team Plasma just upgraded it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

IronDino In reply to ??? [2013-03-13 23:33:19 +0000 UTC]

Not to mention Metagross which is a fused pair of Metang, which in turn is a fused pair of Beldum. So that's like four Pokemon in one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Sonixnight In reply to IronDino [2013-03-13 23:58:33 +0000 UTC]

you are so right

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pentacle565 [2013-03-05 19:58:58 +0000 UTC]

You know, I never thought of that before. In the old battle arena, they even moved independently. Isn't Kangasghan actually 2 pokemon as well? What about slowbro?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Epifex In reply to pentacle565 [2013-03-05 23:20:42 +0000 UTC]

I don't think they count too much. Baby Kanga' doesn't really do much, same with the Shellder.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Detrimont In reply to Epifex [2013-03-06 06:50:05 +0000 UTC]

seeing as the shellder changes form completely, it's not counted as a shellder, let alone an actual pokemon connected to the slowbro

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpinAttaxx In reply to ??? [2013-02-28 22:50:58 +0000 UTC]

And people say that the newer PokΓ©mon are creative. Yeah, two Koffings stuck together is the absolute pinnacle of imagination...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

DarkTailss In reply to SpinAttaxx [2013-07-27 04:37:08 +0000 UTC]

Lol, hey, it took some mad creative sills to use toothpicks and hot glue to stick those Koffings together!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpinAttaxx In reply to SpinAttaxx [2013-03-01 17:09:34 +0000 UTC]

Gah, I meant UNcreative.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Epifex In reply to SpinAttaxx [2013-03-01 09:13:32 +0000 UTC]

True dat.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nuzamaki90 [2013-02-25 23:09:01 +0000 UTC]

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RebelliousTreecko [2013-02-24 07:26:07 +0000 UTC]

The second panel still has me laughing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

boxdude10 In reply to ??? [2013-02-24 04:51:50 +0000 UTC]

Let's not forget Dugtrio as well :L

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

boxdude10 In reply to boxdude10 [2013-02-24 04:52:22 +0000 UTC]

Oh wait, didn't read the description...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MegaEspeon [2013-02-24 00:55:00 +0000 UTC]

Ah, this is so true. x3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MrOAH [2013-02-23 23:23:29 +0000 UTC]

Was almost expecting Weezing for some reason, Magneton is better

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LeonG47 In reply to ??? [2013-02-23 22:33:44 +0000 UTC]

I got a nice smile out of this. Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Epifex In reply to LeonG47 [2013-02-23 22:37:57 +0000 UTC]

No problem, glad you like it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |