HOME | DD

Gmatty — The Fifth Element

Published: 2017-01-11 14:31:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 268; Favourites: 38; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description Source Pic can be found here:- www.pexels.com/photo/abandoned…

Musical Inspiration can be found here...www.youtube.com/watch?v=euMT8I…
Related content
Comments: 67

Gmatty In reply to ??? [2017-01-11 18:50:13 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Arthur...appreciated!    

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

marijeberting [2017-01-11 16:21:01 +0000 UTC]

Very beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gmatty In reply to marijeberting [2017-01-11 16:22:39 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much dear Marije!  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijeberting In reply to Gmatty [2017-01-11 16:26:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xs-deviant In reply to ??? [2017-01-11 15:55:47 +0000 UTC]

I am pretty sure that was a good looking redhead and not this. www.videodetective.com/movies/…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gmatty In reply to xs-deviant [2017-01-11 15:59:30 +0000 UTC]

Yes i love this film.... 
I was going for something along these line
In Plato 's Timaeus  (58d) speaking about air, Plato mentions that "there is the most translucent kind which is called by the name of aether (αίθηρ)".[9]  but otherwise he adopted the classical system of four elements. Aristotle , who had been Plato's student at the Akademia , agreed on this point with his former mentor, emphasizing additionally that fire sometimes has been mistaken for aether. However, in his Book On the Heavens  he introduced a new "first" element to the system of the classical elements  of Ionian  philosophy . He noted that the four terrestrial classical elements were subject to change and naturally moved linearly. The first element however, located in the celestial regions and heavenly bodies, moved circularly and had none of the qualities the terrestrial classical elements had. It was neither hot nor cold, neither wet nor dry. With this addition the system of elements was extended to five and later commentators started referring to the new first one as the fifth and also called it aether, a word that Aristotle had not used.[10]
but its open to anyone's interpretation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xs-deviant In reply to Gmatty [2017-01-11 16:20:30 +0000 UTC]

Close enough I think. Most people probably lost us both, as long as we understand      

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gmatty In reply to xs-deviant [2017-01-11 16:22:09 +0000 UTC]

  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sissyroberta In reply to ??? [2017-01-11 15:45:54 +0000 UTC]

Very Hypnotic ! I love it !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gmatty In reply to sissyroberta [2017-01-11 15:47:25 +0000 UTC]

Aww  Thank you so much dear Roberta!  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dark-Wayfarer In reply to ??? [2017-01-11 14:55:33 +0000 UTC]

Hypnotic mystical....  Lost in patterns....   

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gmatty In reply to Dark-Wayfarer [2017-01-11 15:47:01 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much dear Je!  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dark-Wayfarer In reply to Gmatty [2017-01-11 16:02:03 +0000 UTC]

It was my pleasure dear Gmatty!  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Placi1 In reply to ??? [2017-01-11 14:55:14 +0000 UTC]

COOL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gmatty In reply to Placi1 [2017-01-11 15:46:39 +0000 UTC]

Thank you my friend! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Placi1 In reply to Gmatty [2017-01-11 16:21:47 +0000 UTC]

My pleasure!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |