HOME | DD
griffsnuff β Convo
Published: 2012-04-07 14:34:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 186002; Favourites: 6297; Downloads: 1101
Redirect to original
Description
Mutt, loki and GunnarMore animations
Related content
Comments: 873
Gunnar is me in a nutshell XD
π: 0 β©: 0
Looool! Β I think I'm gonna wet my pants. Funniest thing I've seen all day bro! Β that masked thing, it looks like those store pets off of Chicken Smoothie. Β XD
And that other animal on the left, that was SO funny! Β He randomly butted in and yelledΒ
AND I GOT STHWAG! Β XD Β Β Yeah, for you in this case it means Seriously Wierd Abnoxious Gladness
π: 0 β©: 0
My boyfriend is just sitting here, watching this over and over again. He totally loves Gunnar xD
π: 0 β©: 0
I really love snuffen, kupa, loki and gunnar <3 xD
π: 0 β©: 0
This made me laughΒ so hard I think I'm gonna pee myself xDDD
π: 0 β©: 0
THIS IS THE CUTEST THING EVER
*ehem*
I-I mean...
π: 0 β©: 0
The funniest thing I've ever seen... but what does the one on the left say?
π: 0 β©: 0
Wha... but... none of these have any actual motion... Animation literally means "the illusion of motion" and these have as many keyframes as there are mythical creatures on the planet.
Also, please never use the word swag again. Thanks.
π: 0 β©: 4
1. Why bother commenting when you can ignore looking at this.
2. This is indeed animation, you blind fool! Animation can be taken in different kind of stages. An animation can be smooth or like this one, pics changing forms and shapes.
3. The end with Gunnar is a smoother animation, thank you very much for not noticing that.
4. SWAG SWAG SWAG ON YOU!
5. SWAGSWAGSWAGSWAGSWAGSWAGΒ
P.S. I HATE people like you trying to tell others how this and that works and how it should be done.Β
MΓ DJΓVULEN TA DIG HΓ RT I RΓVEN, Amen!! (you're welcome to translate it!)Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Its apparant you do not understand animation. These have keyrames, and it makes it just as much animation as if it had 100 inbetweens. Illusion of motion does not have to be smooth. And i have a batchelor in animation, so I do belive I know what im talking about more than you do.
SWAG SWAG SWAAGSWAG SWAG SWAAGSWAG SWAG SWAAGSWAG SWAG SWAAGSWAG SWAG SWAAGSWAG SWAG SWAAGSWAG SWAG SWAAGSWAG SWAG SWAAG
π: 0 β©: 2
Also, degree in animation != animation master. See also: Tom Preston
π: 0 β©: 0
But animation tends to look far better when smooth. If you enjoy animation, then why not use your talent to its full potential? And I wasn't trying to say it didn't contain any keyframes, I was saying that it contained very few.
π: 0 β©: 1
Just because it looks better does not mean it is animation more over what is only keyframes. These are ment to be keyframe only, and you look very uneducated with what you first said, since keyframes is the most important part of animation
and you clearly said "Wha... but... none of these have any actual motion... Animation literally means "the illusion of motion"
The fact that you said it had no motion means you mean it has no animation, which it does, just admit you were wrong instead of trying to look even dumder, and yes to your other comment, having a degree in something tends to SHOW that you have atleast studied it. What the hell is wrong with you xD You dont need to be a master to know keyframes are the essense of animation, thats like the first thing you learn in any animation course lol
π: 0 β©: 1
I know that keyframes are the essence of animation. And this happens to be very void of any. If you're able to make it look better, then why don't you?
π: 0 β©: 1
No you apparently didnt know that until I told you since you said it wasnt animation. TWO keyframes showing motion is still animation. Because it SHOWS motion xDΒ I dont have to make eveyrthing I do look amazing because thats not the point of art.
π: 0 β©: 0
Is this really all you do?
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't understand the question.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't mean to be rude, but are you just trying to find the flaws in things?
π: 0 β©: 1
The only flaw is that you called it an animation when it's not. Otherwise, It'd be perfectly fine. I just feel that the term "animation" is being misrepresented here.
π: 0 β©: 2
Well let's see you animate and draw like this, THEN you can critique her. It moves, doesn't it? Get over yourself. Quit being technical and just enjoy it.
π: 0 β©: 0
It moves, is that not animation?
π: 0 β©: 2
Yes it is animation, this person does not know what they are talking about xDD
π: 0 β©: 1
A motion comic moves, but it's not referred to as animation.
π: 0 β©: 1
You still don't have to be a kill-joy.
π: 0 β©: 1
I didn't intend to be a killjoy, I simply wished to correct the usage of the word, "animation" being used here.
π: 0 β©: 1
which you didnt have to correct since it was correct to begin with xD
π: 0 β©: 1
Understand that all I'm trying to do at this point is to get you to produce the best work that you can. The thought of "good enough" disgusts me. If you're capable of smooth, nice looking, animation then you should make it. Not something half-baked like this.
π: 0 β©: 1
xD Well I DONT have to produce the best work I can ALL the time. And if you took some time and checked I love making funny things. And no offense but if you want people only to produce amazing animations, I wouldnt really say you had the most amazing animation out there. I make art for myself and not for assholes like you to be pleased by, why dont you go practice and make something better than half baked yourself? You still look like a complete fool
π: 0 β©: 1
Clearly my words are falling on deaf ears. My apologies for wasting your time.
π: 0 β©: 1
You cant accept that you were wrong, so your to proud and you sound like a hypocrit for wanting others to do their best when you dont show it yourself.
π: 0 β©: 0
Do not stare at me, I am a lady.
No you are a b*tch.
And I got swag.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yes, she is a female dog, Loki! Correct!
X3Β
π: 0 β©: 0
These are so hilarious lololol
π: 0 β©: 0
are you sure you don't mean MY school?
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>