HOME | DD
griffsnuff — Dem princesses
Published: 2012-08-18 21:45:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 18282; Favourites: 1706; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I cant contain all this beauty <3SHHHH MULAN ISNT A PRINCESS
Princesses (c) Disney
Related content
Comments: 314
that....... is so........ beautiful. I can die happily now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This gave me a good chuckle! They're so lovely! ;w;
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That is just...
Beautiful.
I can see dem watermarks
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Besides I dont do Disney/pixar ones
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aww. It's really worth watching, the animation is amazing C:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mulan is better than a princess: She's a warrior. >8D
These are all so hilarious haha.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hina: -starts laughing hysterically-
Bludgeon: Breathe! Breathe!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So glad you did Disney Princesses. Had you done Lion King you would be in for a long run of art theft and copy cats. I've seen so much BS from that fan base it'll knock you for a loop!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lol there all doing the duck face XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
In the Disney version she was. At least she was the chieftains daughter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What? Oh, I'm sorry that must have come out pretty harsh?
Just correcting you C:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What?
Why are you upset? I'm not being confrontational at all, I was just correcting your statement.
Are you OK?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm fine. Why you ask? ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What are you surrendering from?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have no idea what your saying! ^_e
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A daughter of a Indian chief is called a princess so yes she is xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
That's not true though. It's a common misconception. Even the Disney company itself has said that Pocahontas and Mulan are both no-royalty princesses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It doesnt matter what disney said, the daugheter of a Chief is called a princess, which has nothing to do with royalty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That isn't true though. Like I've already said on here, that's just something the Europeans came up with. She isn't really a princess. A chieftan's daughter is like the same thing as a president's daughter. She doesn't get anything out of being what she is the way a princess does. Chief's daughters aren't the same as princesses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes but as long as we use the name princess I will draw her in there xD with the other "princesses"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sorry, I didn't know okay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yes she is.
She's the chief's daughter = she's a princess
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
No she's not. Native American chiefs were chosen by the people. So a chief's daughter was like any elected official's kid. She's no better than anyone else.
The Europeans called them princesses when they came over to America, but there were wrong. So no. Pocahontas is not true royalty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm sorry! I didn't know! One of the few Disney princesses I didn't like, okay?! Geez! Gang up on meh with barbed wired baseball bats why don't cha!?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
He just told you she was, no need to get all upset ;u;
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
abviously their looking for attention or trying to make Auraghost look mean...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Aurora's face reminds me of the pokemon Gloom XD
Ilovethis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>