HOME | DD

king-homo β€” and here's another

#socialjustice #sjw #social_justice #sjws #socialjusticewarriors #antisjw #socialjusticewarrior #sjwstupidity #sjwbullshit #socialjusticebullshit #anti_sjw #antisjws #sjwbait #sjwstamp #antisjwbullshit #sjwnonsense #sjw_pandering #antisjwstamp #sjwoffensive
Published: 2017-09-06 02:15:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 2917; Favourites: 27; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description [stamp template]

you all love thick skin so much, so why not grow some? if a widdle sensitive SJW like me can accept white privilege as a reality, which it is, and not feel all offended and upset about it, why can't the strong paragons of logic, the anti-SJWs do the same?

[things to keep in mind before commenting and seeking a """debate""":
1.) i dont have to google things for you.
2.) i know you're not just trying to seek a civil conversation, you absolute dumbfuck.
3.) it is not my responsibility to coddle your hurt feelings on scientific issues. facts are facts, and you get to accept them.
4.) if you think i'm NOT gonna post this in every SJW-related anti-SJW safe space tag known to man, you are completely out of your mind ]
Related content
Comments: 126

king-homo In reply to ??? [2017-11-29 03:05:05 +0000 UTC]

source?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ForceOfNatureAndCorn In reply to king-homo [2017-11-29 09:37:16 +0000 UTC]

ageofshitlords.com/sorry-tumbl…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to ForceOfNatureAndCorn [2017-12-05 20:19:18 +0000 UTC]

sorry, but no. an opinion blog is not an academic source. give me an academic source that i can’t refute.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ForceOfNatureAndCorn In reply to king-homo [2017-12-05 20:55:47 +0000 UTC]

It brought up actual fucking points.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to ForceOfNatureAndCorn [2017-12-05 21:03:42 +0000 UTC]

sorry, kid. no academic source, no being taken seriously. i’m only holding you to standards that anti sjws hold us to.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rebelspecter7 In reply to ??? [2017-11-19 05:48:14 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to Rebelspecter7 [2017-11-29 03:04:46 +0000 UTC]

source?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rebelspecter7 In reply to king-homo [2017-11-29 04:49:27 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to Rebelspecter7 [2017-12-05 20:17:44 +0000 UTC]

nope, not good enough. give me an academic source that i can’t refute.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rebelspecter7 In reply to king-homo [2017-12-06 15:51:15 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to Rebelspecter7 [2017-12-06 16:33:24 +0000 UTC]

again, ACADEMIC SOURCES ONLY. for someone calling me stupid, reading comprehension does not seem to be a strong suit of yours. but that’s okay! you can still prove your point to me. give me academic sources. not some asshole named Cishet Shitlord III’s opinion blog.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LaundrySoapman In reply to ??? [2017-10-15 09:05:05 +0000 UTC]

Every one has privilege. You're a SJW in denial.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to LaundrySoapman [2017-10-16 01:43:34 +0000 UTC]

... yeah, honey, i know. that's kind of a major tenet of social justice these days xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Flora-Tea In reply to ??? [2017-09-13 05:34:24 +0000 UTC]

Mostly everyone is "privileged" in America, honestly. And I think people are more "privileged" based on their monetary wealth a whole lot more than their skin tone or anything else related to appearance, which I'm starting to notice more and more recently.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to Flora-Tea [2017-09-14 21:04:08 +0000 UTC]

sure, there's a lot of different forms of privilege out there. class privilege is real, thin privilege is real, attractive privilege is real to a degree though i don't consider it or thin privilege even REMOTELY comparable to white privilege and class privilege. those two last issues are more societal than institutional, though there are situations in which they show up institutionally (for example: fat women are less likely to receive the medical treatment they need and deserve than thin women, it is assumed that any and all medical problems we could endure are due to us being fat when that is just factually not the case. fatness is not some powerful disease and weight loss does not cure all.)

but that doesn't make white privilege any less real, or backed up by facts and american (global, really - but let's focus on america since that's where i live) history.

the fact that whatever "third world country" that could be on your mind right now "has it worse" speaks to absolutely nothing regarding our own country's problems. problems still exist here, SERIOUS-ass problems. and one of those problems is, white people have it GREAT on the axis of race. we are not doubted as human beings, we are in fact considered the standard of humanity as far as race goes. european features are the standard of beauty. we have never been prevented from voting (excluding POOR whites, which is a class issue. they were prevented from voting for being POOR, not for being WHITE.), we are not demonized as criminals and thugs by the media, we didn't suffer years of chattel slavery (yes, yes, irish slaves, blah blah, etc - that wasn't CHATTEL slavery) and sharecropping, we didn't suffer any equivalent of jim crow, or racial segregation (we greatly benefited from segregation LOL we got all the good shit while, even when "separate but equal" was the law, black americans got roughly jack and shit), like... the list goes on and on. white privilege is real, it is not a theory or an opinion anymore.

class privilege does not have to be the one prevailing "true" privilege, as serious as it is (speaking as someone who grew up in SEVERE financial troubles), because, uh... no, white privilege exists, so does male privilege, cis privilege, straight privilege, and the list goes on. citing class privilege just to shut down discussions of white privilege is a wee bit shitty of people.

and i'm here to say class privilege does NOT erase other privilege. i may have been in a poor situation as a kid, but i was still white. and i still had white privilege, i can remember very clearly what that felt like. privileges and disadvantages intersect, and nothing cancels each other out. the fun part of this discussion is having the nuance to understand all of this simultaneously.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cream-Puff-Crossing In reply to ??? [2017-09-12 13:36:08 +0000 UTC]

Well, in a time and circumstances yes. Though I wouldn't say it's real recently since my boyfriend was literally dying in the hospital room about his scoliosis and the doctors let black people with minor stuff in there before him. It got so bad that they just left to go to another hospital.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to Cream-Puff-Crossing [2017-09-12 15:33:21 +0000 UTC]

no, white privilege is factually the rule and not the exception. white people not benefiting from it is the exception, and im very sorry for your boyfriend to be experiencing the exception at such a critical time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Angelic-Blossoms In reply to ??? [2017-09-06 02:27:47 +0000 UTC]

I think a few races can get some sort of privilege if they know how to use it.
Plenty of universities offer full paid scholarships for simply being black.Β 
Asians tend to be seen as very docile and harmless.
Hell females are essentially becoming a protected class.Β 
Sure does white privilege exist, yes it does. But is it the only privilege to exist, no.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to Angelic-Blossoms [2017-09-06 02:35:41 +0000 UTC]

white privilege is far from the only privilege to exist. we've got able-bodied privilege, rich privilege, male privilege, cis privilege, neurotypical privilege - all kinds of things, and all these things intersect with each other differently. life in terms of privilege and oppression as a gay black man would be different from life as a trans white woman, both people have privileges and disadvantages.

however, what you've described with asians is called benevolent racism. reducing a race to "docility" and "harmlessness" is not giving that race privilege, it is stereotyping them.

similarly, i have not seen much evidence that women are becoming a "protected" class. can you explain what that means exactly?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

drawandcreate In reply to king-homo [2017-09-06 15:35:56 +0000 UTC]

It means that you are succeeding. Women are growing more and more priviledged by the day. Or month.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to drawandcreate [2017-09-06 16:54:25 +0000 UTC]

who is "you"?

can you explain female privilege to me? what unique benefits that are NOT actually disadvantages (ex: stereotyping) do women receive?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

drawandcreate In reply to king-homo [2017-09-06 18:21:18 +0000 UTC]

I mean the sjw community.
And What i ment with female privilege is that the consequences are worse if you say shit about women then about men.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

king-homo In reply to drawandcreate [2017-09-06 18:48:24 +0000 UTC]

that's all the advantages women have in society? people are starting to understand how big a deal misogyny is?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Feedingfrenzy91 In reply to king-homo [2021-09-24 08:46:34 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

drawandcreate In reply to king-homo [2017-09-07 17:38:04 +0000 UTC]

yup

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to drawandcreate [2017-09-07 20:50:42 +0000 UTC]

man... that's not much of a privilege xD

considered to the exhaustive list of privileges MEN have simply for BEING MEN, that's... really not much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

drawandcreate In reply to king-homo [2017-09-11 05:05:50 +0000 UTC]

Theres more. But there are people who explain it way better then me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

king-homo In reply to drawandcreate [2017-09-11 15:34:28 +0000 UTC]

i mean, alright, fair enough!

but until women are no longer inherently taken less seriously than men, until women are no longer seen as hysterical and irrational by doctors (ESPECIALLY when they're fat) - and thus not given the diagnoses and treatments that they need, until women are no longer seen as sex objects and romantic prospects before human beings, until women are depicted as inherently less complex and deep than men, etc, etc (the list truly goes on for DAYS), i doubt i'll think women are a privileged group, much less over men xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

drawandcreate In reply to drawandcreate [2017-09-06 18:21:32 +0000 UTC]

Now please end this conversation.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |