HOME | DD

Published: 2014-08-21 04:54:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 34135; Favourites: 455; Downloads: 243
Redirect to original
Description
pregnant crusaders!if you've been following me you'll know the 'fathers'
Related content
Comments: 86
KotovDisease In reply to ??? [2014-08-22 15:44:25 +0000 UTC]
But this content is different, the characters are not real, they lack basically everything that qualifies as living. But of course gray areas don't exist so my neutrality on the subject is useless.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tttooohappy In reply to KotovDisease [2014-08-22 17:43:54 +0000 UTC]
it dusent mater if they are real or not if we show its ok in any way we are indorsing it (already 1 out of 3 girls are sexually abused). these people will tack any excuse to say that its ok and will not stop unless we stat cracking down harder on them and showing them its NEVER ok . we as a society are far to lenient to those who do commit those atrocious acts and need to change that so that this doesn't happen but if we encourage it in any way shape or form nothing is going to change
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KotovDisease In reply to tttooohappy [2014-08-22 18:14:17 +0000 UTC]
There is a distinct line between fantasy and reality, I know you've heard that line countless times before, but to assume that those people endorse such activities relies heavily on the hysteria known as "Rape Culture". The line is there, clear as crystal, the problem is that it is moved to further people's personal agendas. The problem is not that Johnny can't think, the problem is that he doesn't know what thinking is, he confuses it with feeling.
So what if you are disgusted by something, not everyone is going to agree with you or be offended by the same things as you, and that is not because they have internalized abuse of any kind. It is because they aren't that self important, they realize that complaining about something online will get them nowhere in real life.
i.imgur.com/rVrcivj.jpg
i.imgur.com/TVyTdJ6.jpg
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tttooohappy In reply to KotovDisease [2014-08-23 01:57:31 +0000 UTC]
for the most part I agree with you this is the first time for me really biching about something like this and yes its not good to force your vew on others . I just ignored the pic no mater how uncomfortable it made me feel but ignoring it is worse especially where is such a real problem out there. so starting now call i'm calling attention to it and making people aware of how bad it is so more people realize and maybe evenly things will start to change. yes I relies some people like things rather forceful in fanticey (don't mean they want to be raped or anything) and yes I realise that "Rape Culture" is not going to be stopped anytime soon I just don't wont kids be sexualised any more because they shouldn't be cuz there kids fictional or none fictional
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KotovDisease In reply to tttooohappy [2014-08-23 02:06:38 +0000 UTC]
True, but it's really not going to solve the problem. If no real form of harm is being shown, don't bother, I don't think DA needs trigger warnings
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ColonelBSacquet In reply to KotovDisease [2014-11-28 15:38:58 +0000 UTC]
"If no real form of harm is being shown"
No real form of harm? So being a kid and a mother isn't a harm? O_o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KotovDisease In reply to ColonelBSacquet [2014-11-28 16:44:37 +0000 UTC]
It's subjective, when the character is fictional, there should be no reason to try to apply any human traits to it to try to communicate with it, as it will never respond or react to anything you do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColonelBSacquet In reply to KotovDisease [2014-11-28 17:17:08 +0000 UTC]
Well, I guess I see your point, but still ...
I find that portraying imaginary characters as teen/minor mothers is akin to endorsing it.
And how could anyone possibly endorse teen/minor pregnancy?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KotovDisease In reply to ColonelBSacquet [2014-11-28 18:08:16 +0000 UTC]
Trust me when I say that portraying something does. Not encourage it. That is exactly the kind of thinking that created such ideas as "rape culture," which is a term used to justify censorship and thought control.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColonelBSacquet In reply to KotovDisease [2014-11-29 12:02:51 +0000 UTC]
"Trust me when I say that portraying something dies. Not encourage it."
What? Wait wait wait ...
You mean that portraying something like teenage pregnancy here, in this kind of way, doesn't encourages said teen pregnancy, but rather fights it? That's what you meant, right?
"Rape culture" might be a term used as a bad excuse for excessive censorship, I agree with you on that.
Though, I, and many other people, have problems with the fact that dire situations - like, for example, rape and teen pregnancy - are portrayed in a positive - or, at the very least, ambiguously light way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KotovDisease In reply to ColonelBSacquet [2014-11-29 16:24:25 +0000 UTC]
That is the point I am attempting to get across, as by that same idea, male rape victims coming clean about being raped would endorse male rape, or the Terry Fox run would endorse cancer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColonelBSacquet In reply to KotovDisease [2014-11-29 17:41:32 +0000 UTC]
"as by that same idea, male rape victims coming clean would endorse male rape, or the Terry Fox run would endorse cancer."
Males victim of rape, being cleaned of all charges, would endorse male rape? O_o
I don't see how, nor do I see the link between that and the picture here above.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
KotovDisease In reply to ColonelBSacquet [2014-12-08 19:57:55 +0000 UTC]
By male rape victims I meant rape victims who were male, btw
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KotovDisease In reply to ColonelBSacquet [2014-11-29 17:48:20 +0000 UTC]
I wasn't fully awake, and I was on my phone, so my comments weren't worded very well, they have been fixed.
The content of something does not make you who you are, one may be able to portray something in a way the not everybody will enjoy, but that does not necessarily reflect how they feel towards the subject in real life, as one's online personality does not always reflect who they actually are in real life, as you do not get to know them outside of their online life and have very little information about who they really are outside of their online persona.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tttooohappy In reply to KotovDisease [2014-08-23 02:56:21 +0000 UTC]
hmmmm you may be right *sigh*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
trinson In reply to ??? [2014-08-22 05:02:31 +0000 UTC]
I follow you, but I guess I am not following you in the right direction. I don't remember seeing the fathers.
Still, this one is getting some interesting comments.
Looks like Scoots is packing Twins. What ever Applebloom is backing is going to give AJ a run for her money on bucking apples.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KotovDisease In reply to trinson [2014-08-22 06:06:50 +0000 UTC]
Well Scoots' will also have separate fathers
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Static-Dr0p [2014-08-21 16:01:18 +0000 UTC]
More round, the better to pound! OH! Giggity giggity giggity goo!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
God-Of-BBQ In reply to YesImDeadpool [2014-08-22 04:01:58 +0000 UTC]
I hope they are too but what scares me is that they don't have breasts so that means... UHOH
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kyuubi-Amaterasu In reply to ??? [2014-08-21 13:55:57 +0000 UTC]
Reading the comics, sometimes I'm glad I didnt suddenly poof into Equestria as a pony. I fear by magic I'll get impregnated by a mare and I'm a stallion >.<
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tetsuya-the-Wise In reply to ??? [2014-08-21 10:18:31 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
drone117 In reply to ??? [2014-08-21 06:55:04 +0000 UTC]
Scootaloo - Impregnated by Rainbowdash/Spitfire
Sweetie Belle - Impregnated by Octavia/Vinyl scratch
Apple Bloom - Impregnated by Rarity/Trixie
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ColonelBSacquet In reply to drone117 [2014-11-28 15:39:56 +0000 UTC]
Impregnated by females? What the feck? O_o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bedeviled-Stallion50 In reply to ColonelBSacquet [2015-05-25 18:38:35 +0000 UTC]
They have futas, apparently...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColonelBSacquet In reply to Bedeviled-Stallion50 [2015-05-25 19:29:42 +0000 UTC]
Oh? Well, that would make sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
the-rainbron3 In reply to drone117 [2014-08-21 09:05:30 +0000 UTC]
the only one that doesn't make sense is Scootaloo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
drone117 In reply to the-rainbron3 [2014-08-21 10:33:35 +0000 UTC]
I just looked at the pics so if we want to know why I guess we will have to ask Lamiaaaa why.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stupidperson2 In reply to ??? [2014-08-21 05:41:27 +0000 UTC]
Ok so:
Applebloom - Big Macintosh
Skootaloo - Rainbow Dash
I just don't know who impregnated Scootaloo. I do know, however, that all of them were great little cum gushers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ringsandamiss007 In reply to ??? [2014-08-21 05:35:02 +0000 UTC]
Sweetie Belle - Impregnated by Spike
Scootaloo - Impregnated by Rumble
Apple Bloom - Impregnated by Pipsqueak
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |