HOME | DD
lucaspol β That Spot... 2
[NSFW]
Published: 2012-09-17 04:40:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 66557; Favourites: 1656; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Check out the gallery -> [link]Models are 18+
Related content
Comments: 91
Usually, I find shots like this on dA to be nothing more than home made porn.
However, I like what you have here. The shot is in focus, well lit and nicely framed. This in my opinion is art and not porn. One of the rare exceptions. Nicely done.
π: 0 β©: 0
As hole!! ^_____^ Its soo ART... really *facepalm*
π: 0 β©: 0
Well they have the "Artistic Nude" gallery..so it's still art.
π: 0 β©: 1
I dont think this counts as artistic. An up close picture of an ass hole is not...art. If you do something with a full naked body in a beautiful background, that's art. Not this.
π: 0 β©: 0
Bull crap. the human body is beautiful.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't want to see this shit on DA sorry dude. Soft core porn and nude up close shots of an ass don't belong on a site that shows off art, this is not art. This is an ass hole... literally.
π: 0 β©: 2
If you don't want to see it on DA, then don't look up stuff like this on DA, or better yet, don't come on DA, sorry dude
π: 0 β©: 1
I dont look it up, its all over the front fucking page when I log on. And why should I not come to DA when most of the art here IS art, yet a few people thing shit like this is art when...its not.
π: 0 β©: 1
All over the front page? I've had several accounts and never has this stuff been on the front page before. Unless you actually look up the stuff, it won't appear on it I guess. But it is art, rather you believe it or not, rather you like it or not, this is art. It just might not be your preferred type of art. I love it myself.
π: 0 β©: 1
go get laid horny bald man boy
π: 0 β©: 1
One, I'm not horny as much as people seem to think. Two, I'm not bald. I'm balding, there is a difference. Finally, just because I like this form of art, doesn't make me horny and it doesn't mean I don't get laid.
π: 0 β©: 2
It's beautiful....... Really
π: 0 β©: 0
if this is art then evey human on planet earth is an artist, since every human is capable of focusing and snapping a shot of an anus and vagina
π: 0 β©: 1
Just being capable of something and actually doing it are different things. I am capable of joining the military, I am capable of doing research on genetics, but I am not going either one. Just because every human can be an artist by doing that, doesn't mean that every human is an artist because they can do it.
π: 0 β©: 0
This is art, sorry, leave it alone
π: 0 β©: 0
Good question. this is porn
π: 0 β©: 1
Its not porn but it is this
What is a "lascivious" image?
Many courts apply the so-called Dost test to determine if a given image is considered to be "lascivious" under the law. United States v. Dost, 636 F. Supp. 828, 832 (S.D. Cal. 1986), aff'd sub nom., United States v. Wiegand, 812 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir. 1987) set forth a six factor test:
β’Whether the genitals or pubic area are the focal point of the image;
β’Whether the setting of the image is sexually suggestive (i.e., a location generally associated with sexual activity, such as a bed);
β’Whether the subject is depicted in an unnatural pose or inappropriate attire considering her age;
β’Whether the subject is fully or partially clothed, or nude;
β’Whether the image suggests sexual coyness or willingness to engage in sexual activity; and
β’Whether the image is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer.
This test requires a case-by-case analysis and is devoid of bright line rules.
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev |