HOME | DD

#af #branco #greta #thunberg #afbranco
Published: 2019-09-25 02:14:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 5180; Favourites: 54; Downloads: 9
Redirect to original
Description
Drawn by Branco I own nothing.Share. Fave. Fight.
(Below are A.F. Branco's words not mine. If you want to see more of AF Branco's art, please go to his website.)
From this link: comicallyincorrect.com/a-f-bra…
It should be considered child abuse that our educators are indoctrinating and brainwashing our kids with extremist left-wing views in the name of saving the planet. Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.
451
Related content
Comments: 284
VentAnger In reply to ??? [2019-10-20 00:10:36 +0000 UTC]
Considering volcanoes put more co2 into the atmosphere than all the cars combined, I suppose that's a relevent point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-20 00:18:19 +0000 UTC]
Yeah but there isn´t an eruption always
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-20 00:18:59 +0000 UTC]
Even the ones that have happened have put more co2 into the atmosphere than all the cars.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-20 00:24:14 +0000 UTC]
well how long a volcano lasts until a point imagine all the cars of the world 24/7 over years and years
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-20 00:25:29 +0000 UTC]
You don't understand what I'm saying.
I'm not saying that if volcanoes erupted 24/7, they would put more co2 into the air than cars do.
I'm saying that the volcano eruptions we have now, they have already put more co2 into the air than all the cars have.
And it's not just volcanoes, earthquakes and shifting tectonic plates put car emissions to shame as well.
And that's not even getting into the issue of cow farts.
Cars are not a threat to the planet, not even close.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-20 00:28:37 +0000 UTC]
Well so what? the damage is already done
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-20 00:29:59 +0000 UTC]
Well what are you going to do about things that effect the planet's climate that have literally nothing to do with any human activity?
You're just going to ignore that?
Why?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-20 00:34:28 +0000 UTC]
Nature it´s unstoppable and unpredictable with all we have done we already messed it more and more
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-20 00:43:31 +0000 UTC]
We can also tame the elements
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-20 00:47:58 +0000 UTC]
How with the HAARP project? nature always finds a way
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-20 00:52:45 +0000 UTC]
China makes rain by flying planes over clouds and dropping water on them, it's how they were able to prevent the olympics from getting rained on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-20 01:05:16 +0000 UTC]
Despite Isaw that still think it´s quite difficult to control climate as we want always
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-20 01:07:56 +0000 UTC]
First you say we change the climate too much and then you say we can't change it enough.
In reality, nothing is stopping us from taking co2 out of the air, putting ice back into the arctic, or building walls that stop a rising tide.
Humans are just survivors like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-20 01:20:28 +0000 UTC]
yeah but each year it´s more difficult things are never so simple and in my opinion it´s better encourage people to pollute less and concern them about the consequences I appreciate your optimism but in my opinion humanity needs a lesson
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-20 01:21:34 +0000 UTC]
Yeesh.
That sounds more like a religious position than a scientific one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-20 01:40:58 +0000 UTC]
I´m not religious just a bit misantrope
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
paconidas In reply to ??? [2019-10-19 15:34:55 +0000 UTC]
Oh of course but I thought this was quite good to debunk many conspiracies I saw here also the links down bellow are quite useful, if you could see past the bad humour and foolishness you'll discover quite good arguments
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 15:40:30 +0000 UTC]
Can you type out one of these "conspiracy theories"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 15:52:54 +0000 UTC]
Well many of you see Soros as the head of an evil plot I even saw a caricature of him delivering inmigrants to the USA. For me it's just another millionare tryng to change the world without success
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 15:55:15 +0000 UTC]
Soros donates millions of dollars to left-wing causes.
That's not a conspiracy theory, that's just a fact.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 15:58:47 +0000 UTC]
So.
You were asked to present one example of a "conspiracy theory" and your only example isn't even a conspiracy theory.
Making you look wrong.
Sinking in yet?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 16:10:40 +0000 UTC]
Yeah but putting him as the face of evil or like many far right groups present him as the face of globalism and the cause of cultural marxism that my friend is a conspiracy as if I said that Ruiz Mateos just because he donates to the Opus dei or the right wing parties of Spain it's a dangerous nazi let's be honest a bunch of donations can't change the world
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 16:13:44 +0000 UTC]
But he's a globalist who supports cultural marxism using millions and millions of dollars.
Nobody even comes close.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 16:31:52 +0000 UTC]
Soros isn't marxist it's a follower of karl Popper who dissagreed on everything with Marx also Soros he donated to end the soviet regime on countries like Poland Ruppert Murdock is far more rich and there is a conspiracy around him.
You seem like a rational dude and yet you relieve on that? The cultural marxism is just smoke the idea of a united left that wants to destroy occident it's ridicule and also it roots on the kultural bolchevism of the nazis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 16:37:47 +0000 UTC]
So you're saying the conspiracy theories surrounding Rupert Murdoch are legit but the ones surrounding Soros aren't?
Why not both? Or neither? Are you just being biased?
You're not really making any sense. Marxism is the belief in a permanent rich class and a permanent poor class that's constantly at war with each other, Cultural Marxism is those same principles applied to race, sex, orientation, etc. It's designed to drive people against eachother on the basis of race and sex. You see this being played out all the time by anti-white racists and man-hating feminists.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 16:46:50 +0000 UTC]
No i wanted to say that there is no conspiracy around him sorry I erased the no by accident i'm on the phone
Ok that isn't feminism I studied gender equality and I asked many of my female companions about it and here is their answer feminism is about the equal rights of men and women same salary same rights and opportunities etc it's not about hating the men it's only that.
And about white racist if you want to figh it don't become a monster.
All of this isn't cultural marxism it's just hate.
Again you seem a pretty rational guy why believe this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 16:48:55 +0000 UTC]
If feminism is only about equal rights then why do they support un-equal policies like gender based hiring quotas and lower standards for women?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 16:56:32 +0000 UTC]
True feminist don't ask for that trust me many of my companions rejected that meassures saying that this only hurts more the ideals of feminism the problem is that as many ideologies got corrupted over time
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 17:06:00 +0000 UTC]
I don't have to trust you.
I've discussed this with many feminists and they all defend their unequal policies as a form of "long term vengeance" for past wrongdoing, proving that it's not actually about equality.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 17:28:32 +0000 UTC]
I think the problem here it's our experience with the movement
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 17:34:29 +0000 UTC]
Well then by all means, present a feminist for questioning and we can see who's right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 20:14:47 +0000 UTC]
I already am I investigated it also I talked with true feminists not the ones you described the prolem nowadays is that only the most radical and eccentric figures are the ones heard
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 20:26:39 +0000 UTC]
I won't believe you until you present one
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 21:05:35 +0000 UTC]
Well for now I advise you investigate further
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 21:06:21 +0000 UTC]
I've done plenty.
Most women don't even identify as feminists because of how anti-men it's become.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 22:03:19 +0000 UTC]
That´s because the movement became twisted by missinformed people still there are true feminist out there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 22:12:39 +0000 UTC]
So you admit feminism has been corrupted.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 22:28:44 +0000 UTC]
In some ways yes but I don´t consider them feminists
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 22:31:49 +0000 UTC]
But they call themselves feminists, and it's not your place to dictate the labels they use to describe themselves.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 22:40:46 +0000 UTC]
True but when you have someone who compare it with and now all the movements that came before and how it truly works and what deffends, anyway I could say the same with Benny and millenials
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 22:45:08 +0000 UTC]
Third-wave feminism is what feminism currently is so that's how it's going to be perceived.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 22:50:34 +0000 UTC]
In my opinion we just centered on their most eccentric figures at least here many old school" feminists are just demanding more strict laws against ill-treatment and raping who sadly are more common specially after this year
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 22:54:09 +0000 UTC]
There's nothing special about being anti-rape or anti ill-treatment, that's not being a feminist, that's just being a normal person.
Who in the world represents a pro-rape position?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 23:02:33 +0000 UTC]
Heh I never do it for being special or whatever I just do what I consider right, the world in my opinion needs the true feminism back.
Well I find one www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjkJf5…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 23:05:06 +0000 UTC]
Wow that was the most autistic thing I've seen in a while, thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 23:10:05 +0000 UTC]
What my opinion or the video?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 23:13:11 +0000 UTC]
The video.
He doesn't understand what satire means.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paconidas In reply to VentAnger [2019-10-19 23:17:53 +0000 UTC]
It isn´t a satire he only said it was satirical after all the backlash
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VentAnger In reply to paconidas [2019-10-19 23:34:40 +0000 UTC]
So in other words, it's satire.
Okay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>