HOME | DD

MBLOCK — CAPSULE MONSTERS

Published: 2010-11-08 02:02:50 +0000 UTC; Views: 32118; Favourites: 608; Downloads: 607
Redirect to original
Description Two artworks of unnamed Capsule Monsters, made in the old school Pokémon sprites style. Their colour scheme is just an interpretation, since the real colours have never leaked.

Finally, these "Capsumons" were leaked out the famous folder that GameFreak made in 1990 about Capsule Monsters.

The Capsumon at the left is seen only once, on a drawing that made the folder's presentation page. It is shown attacking a Capsumon (Who is obviously a very early design of Tyranitar) in the same manner as the Nidorino and the Gengar did on the introduction scene of Pokémon Green. He is a bulk, short on front leg dragon-looking creature with a very long tail. Note, he only have two legs, no arms or back legs. He have a thick back, with ridges running down on the shoulders. He's quite reminiscent of Feraligatr and share some anatomies similarities with the Dogondos from Zelda. This is probably a creature that never made it, not even in a other design, in the final game. (Though maybe this was a very early Feraligatr design?)

The Capsumon at the right is also seen only once in a drawing, in the very same folder of 1990. It is shown in a sketch of the design for the creature infos page. (The one showing the name, LV, stats etc.) But it's unknown if the creature within the exemple is a real one or the design of a real Capsumon. It's a dragon like creature, it stand on his powerful yet short back legs. He have short arms, with claws and a long neck. He's got quite a short tail, small un-detailed wings and two small horns behind his head. On the page, it's shown having the number #124 (Jinx?) and quite a good attack stat and great special stat, but a awful speed stat. On a other side, note the incredible amount of HP this little fella has: 900!! And then the TP? What does that mean... Training Point maybe? Maybe they wanted at first, like most of the RPG, having the characters a lot of life points, like in Mother/Earthbound. But then the damage calculation would have been quite hard and painful, I guess, for such a limited memory space. He's quite reminiscent of Charizard and Aerodactyl, but this creature was probably more a dragon prototype... or just a poorly draw Capsumon by an guy who didn't took references for it.

---

Capsule Monsters = Pokémon (Pocket Monsters)!

The franchise started with a manga made by Satoshi Tajiri back in 1975, but the manga was a commercial failure and finally was discontinued. He then asked Ken Sugimori to draw his "Capsumon" and follow him in founding GameFreak. After many years and some games, the project came back to the spotlight: In 1990, GameFreak made a huge folder of all their ideas for Capsule Monsters, including several creatures designs, map, scenes, battle system and even pages detailing the creatures data page. Apparently, Tajiri had trouble to trademarking (Copyright issues) the name so he changed it first to "CapuMon" and then later "Pocket Monsters" or "Pokémon". Green/Red/Blue finally came out in 1996, 6 years after the folder was done. Several Pokémons were designed as soon as in the late 1975, as Nidorino, Gengar, Slowbro and Rhydon and made it to the final game (G/R/B) in 1996. We can deduce this: Designing most of the original planned (190?) Pokémons for generation 1 probably took about 20 years OR MORE. (Note for myself: Ah that's why Pokémon looked awesome back in the days!! I should get my ass on some designs soon or I won't be able to post anytime near, ROLF)

Reference: [link]
Related content
Comments: 81

Brightcynder [2010-12-01 23:13:05 +0000 UTC]

Retrosauce! Awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MetaKnightFreak [2010-11-27 21:46:22 +0000 UTC]

Pokemon's beta stuff is starting to get very interesting to me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NkoGnZ In reply to ??? [2010-11-15 00:52:29 +0000 UTC]

I like to think that the blue one was a prototype evo of Dragonair!? it kinda makes sense...KINDA!
Also the other would be the proto of Charizard, or perhaps a pokefusion that got separated???
Anyway good work , love the R/B/G style of coloring here, nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GengarGirlCat [2010-11-12 19:27:16 +0000 UTC]

omg this blew my mind. this is amazing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

YATATA-KUN [2010-11-12 14:42:38 +0000 UTC]

maybe the right one was a beta charizard! you know they saw the design and thought "lets make this more detailed."

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

myumorph [2010-11-11 23:28:04 +0000 UTC]

Woah these are amazing!
I'm sure the one on the left is beta Nidorino

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CinnamonKitt [2010-11-11 14:08:07 +0000 UTC]

AMG LOVE ~<333

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TayJay5 In reply to ??? [2010-11-09 13:47:49 +0000 UTC]

I like this colour scheme. Keep going.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RacieB [2010-11-08 23:29:47 +0000 UTC]

There's a few more unused ones here that are hilarious [link] WHY CAN'T PAPYOH BE REAL

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

diedhorribledeaths In reply to RacieB [2011-05-01 22:12:26 +0000 UTC]

Papyoh? Where? WHERE?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RacieB In reply to diedhorribledeaths [2011-05-01 22:49:58 +0000 UTC]

They got removed, the page used to have pre-Red & Green concept sketches for Pokémon, Papyoh was a googly-eyed crab thing XP

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

diedhorribledeaths In reply to RacieB [2011-05-02 00:17:07 +0000 UTC]

D':>
I wanted to see it...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MBLOCK In reply to RacieB [2010-11-09 23:31:40 +0000 UTC]

What an interesting website! Thanks for sharing!
OH GOD PAPYOH IS SO WONDEFUL...I-I CANNOT GASP THE TRUE FORM OF IT'S BEAUTY

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Eternity9 In reply to ??? [2010-11-08 22:25:58 +0000 UTC]

They kinda look cute but wow I had no idea it took them that long!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Twarda8 [2010-11-08 17:55:22 +0000 UTC]

Great interpretation! You should make 'Donkey Kong' too! Your lines and colouring are epic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MBLOCK In reply to Twarda8 [2010-11-09 23:36:22 +0000 UTC]

D'aww thanks sweetie, t'was a lot of fun!

WHOAH A DONKEY KONG LOOK-A-LIKE POKÉMON???
If you have a picture of it I really would be happy if I could see it haha
Must be a little bit scary and OH GOD just had a picture in my head, it must look a bit like Hihidaruma?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Twarda8 In reply to MBLOCK [2010-11-10 23:05:16 +0000 UTC]

OOOOKEEEYYY!
[link]
Second row, very unclearly but it is. It looks like gorilla with a hat <.<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MBLOCK In reply to Twarda8 [2010-11-11 14:30:35 +0000 UTC]

Oh God... I'm glad it didn't came out finally, it look like a Donkey Kong with Ness cap. Though the little guy he's fighting is looking like a substitute doll! Interesting! :'D

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Twarda8 In reply to MBLOCK [2010-11-12 00:10:45 +0000 UTC]

Substitute Doll... What a mysterious item... Many pokemon has silouettes similar to Dubstitute Doll... 4 known pokemon (1st gen) have body shape similar to Substitute Doll...
Substitute Doll...
The first pokemon ever created?
The template for future pokemon?
What exacly Substitute Doll used to be?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SeriesArtiststarter In reply to ??? [2010-11-08 16:44:30 +0000 UTC]

Interesting a very good example of what coulda been really Heh heh these guys coulda really been great if they became finalized and altered abit Very cool like in a old sorta way

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kureeru [2010-11-08 06:16:03 +0000 UTC]

Sérieux ils roxxent ces deux la <3
J'ai une préférence pour le bleu

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

callumCRUNCH In reply to ??? [2010-11-08 05:58:14 +0000 UTC]

Nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

glaciachan [2010-11-08 03:52:57 +0000 UTC]

I bet the TP was like MP in a lot of RPG's, that is, Pokemon would use it to perform special/elemental attacks. Also, interesting to see that the differences in stats were a lot more extreme than they are in the final games.

The fact that the most of the games were developed in 1990(when the Game Boy was new), but released in 1996(98 for North America), when the Game Boy Color was going to be at the end of its lifespan in about three years, not counting backwards-compatible GBC games, also kind of explains why the graphics look so different compared to the official art; the sprites were probably made before the final concept and official art was created.

Anyway, I like your twist on these guys; they look simple even compared to the Generation I Pokemon, but you've managed to make them look official. Perhaps were these meant to be Dragon-types, and that Game Freak was planning to have more Dragons than were in the final games?

Sorry for the rambling comment, I'm just so fascinated by the early history of Pokemon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MBLOCK In reply to glaciachan [2010-11-08 15:32:06 +0000 UTC]

Hey it's really an interesting opinion and comment, don't feel sorry for it sweetie, I do really enjoy it and when people are able to discust such theory! I am really agreeing to your artwork theory, it's probably right since most of the design of generation one have been corrected in the sprites of the second generation! Yes, I heard that Pokémon was supposed to have some more Dragon type, there's even a theory about Charizard being one in the early developpemnt but this is not confirmed. Also, as about 190 pokémons were supposed to be for these games, there was sure more dragon type and maybe these guys were some! Thank you for taking your time and reading and writing about the stuff I wrote down up here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Strontium-Chloride [2010-11-08 02:59:38 +0000 UTC]

These guys are so cute! But they look more like imaginary friends a 3rd grader might make up than something you would train in a pokemon game.
just shows you how far pokemon has come!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MBLOCK In reply to Strontium-Chloride [2010-11-08 15:36:26 +0000 UTC]

Haha your right! And I understand what you mean by their design realisation. In fact, it's true that the Pokémons from first generation have been made by a kid, Satoshi Tajiri was about 10 when he made up the Capsule Monsters manga! (Which contained much of pre-alfa design for some Pokémons) But I think that why I love them... (Very personnal opinion here) more than the new one. I prefer Pokémon made by a kid anf for kid than Pokémon made by adults for kids. I'm sure lot od people have talent and I'm sure adults have potential as children have but I think this make more sense if the children get their word on Pokémon design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Strontium-Chloride In reply to MBLOCK [2010-11-08 22:09:04 +0000 UTC]

Hu interesting

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

10xTAGx01 In reply to ??? [2010-11-08 02:40:59 +0000 UTC]

wow. thats really neat. and explains why the new ones suck compared to the old ones! lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MBLOCK In reply to 10xTAGx01 [2010-11-08 15:36:55 +0000 UTC]

Haha, I couldn't agree more sweetheart!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

saiyamewome In reply to ??? [2010-11-08 02:07:22 +0000 UTC]

dam that's a long time ago, although they dont look like much of a special pokemon back then. Well just these guys, they look too simple xD
but wow, at all the reference, still reading more =X

👍: 0 ⏩: 0