HOME | DD

HeartlessSlayer In reply to ??? [2011-08-22 02:05:58 +0000 UTC]

And acting self righteous like what you are doing only making yourself look more immature and ruining everyone else's fun.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TF141Soldier In reply to HeartlessSlayer [2011-08-22 04:47:53 +0000 UTC]

Man you don't get it do you.

Such a defensive moron. I was simply making a joke.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HeartlessSlayer In reply to TF141Soldier [2011-08-22 04:52:59 +0000 UTC]

Well if that was a joke, you could've made it more clear. With the way you responded and how its hard to express what we're saying, it can be taken in anyway possible. Could've hinted something like having a laughing emoticon or simply a "lol". Just because you know you're joking doesn't mean anyone else is gonna get it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TF141Soldier In reply to HeartlessSlayer [2011-08-22 04:55:20 +0000 UTC]

I understand your point, and the saying "People will just take opportunity" I do admit I can do, but I'm simply saying that modern day animation is starting to really get... odd. Very odd.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HeartlessSlayer In reply to TF141Soldier [2011-08-22 05:01:08 +0000 UTC]

Glad to see we got that cleared up before it got ugly unintentionally. To your comment about modern animation, the truth is that animation has always been changing throughout the decades ever since the 1930's and 40's. Even though some of animation today can be weird, it just means people's tastes in animation presentation has changed, as well, its the common gimmick that keeps selling. For example, when a show like spongebob becomes a big hit, every other company tries to rip it off. But later on, what we consider weird now will eventually be retro and nostalgic as who knows what will the future of animation be like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TF141Soldier In reply to HeartlessSlayer [2011-08-22 05:05:08 +0000 UTC]

No idea. We'll see how it goes. But the taste was sorta iffy from the start, with Ren and Stimpy and all, for example.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HeartlessSlayer In reply to TF141Soldier [2011-08-22 05:06:34 +0000 UTC]

Oh that one is a REALLY different scenario. To keep it short, the inspiration to how that show even works dates back to the looney tunes short made by Bob Clampett, who was John K.'s biggest inspiration.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TF141Soldier In reply to HeartlessSlayer [2011-08-22 05:08:19 +0000 UTC]

The new Looney Tunes show is a little better. The animation in Looney Tunes and parody was great, but it had no structure or plot. Ren and Stimpy was a show that is purely known for his infamous nature: like in episodes like Sven Hoek or the Fan Club episodes. Definitely, the first two seasons are okay at best, but most of it is just purely for gross humor and insanity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HeartlessSlayer In reply to TF141Soldier [2011-08-22 05:11:48 +0000 UTC]

Still have yet to see it, but its gonna air in the fall where I am so I'll be sure to check it out. With Ren and Stimpy, their main focus was on the use of animation to make such a surreal world, in short, all on animation and no plot. Hell, if you were to try and work with John K. as a storyboard writer, he would fire you on the second. He REFUSES to have any written plot in his work. So yeah, that's why you see all gross humour and insanity in his works.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TF141Soldier In reply to HeartlessSlayer [2011-08-22 23:06:22 +0000 UTC]

I admire his attempt, but it got caught up in its own little world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0