HOME | DD

#paleoart #tyrannosaurus #feathereddinosaur
Published: 2014-10-21 14:32:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 32791; Favourites: 226; Downloads: 94
Redirect to original
Description
In this piece I tried to come up with an accurate yet reasonable design for our beloved Edmontosaurus hunter (yes, the T.rex is feathered!).The specimen in case is Sue, the very well known Tyrannosaurus, which has been reconstructed basing on both the skeletal by Scott Hartman, and the skeleton itself (I tried to stay as accurate as possible here, to get the anatomical stance right).
Now, I have to clarify a few things about the concept:
As you can see it displays cassowary-like black feathers, that surely did a great job in helping the animal keep its body temperature. The layers of feathers themselves aren't that long, as they last for just about 30cm from the animal's bulkiness. I decided not to give the head and a portion of the neck feathers, but rather keep them naked, as this would help the dinosaurs during hunting and eating process, allowing to keep itself relatively clean (you can witness this in some vulture species nowadays).
About the Tyrannosaurus feathers matter, check this: dinogoss.blogspot.ro/2014/07/pā¦
Head and skin: yet again, I used birds such as turkeys and cassowary's for the neck and some of the head's skin (not to forget the classical bird feet). I also gave it some facial and neck features such as lips, cheeks (where the line of the mouth ends), and a wattle. Now, on the wattle, we do have some sort of paleontologic reference, as there has been found a preserved wattle-like structure on the Asian T.rex cousin, Tarbosaurus. However, when it comes to things like lips and cheeks, we can just be speculative here, as we don't have clear evidence supporting them. I just feel like the addition of these two adds a feeling of natural, a feeling of seeing an animal that could have existed (and here I mean just as I showed above).
Having said that, I truly hope you will enjoy this artwork, and of course, feel free to post your thoughts and feelings about it, but also criticism if needed.
Maurizio.
Related content
Comments: 138
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to ??? [2014-10-21 20:02:53 +0000 UTC]
If you consider the body mass and bulkiness of the T.rex, you will actually find out these feathers aren't that heavy or long. Also, it would be disadvantageous to lack feathers in certain parts of the body, as the feathers serve an important insulating purpose. Lacking feathers somewhere would be a sign of handicap for such an advanced creature. As you can notice, the only naked parts I've left are the head and neck, since it would be difficult to stay clean with feathers impregnating with blood and meat all over
Thanks anyway!
š: 0 ā©: 0
SpinozillaRex In reply to ??? [2014-10-21 17:31:28 +0000 UTC]
The t.rex has this expression that looks like its saying "oh yeah i'm a bad bitch" XD
really nice drawing, I love the cassowary feathers and turkey like head. Also that the arms aren't visible, normally they're visible in other drawings but I just LOVE the bird like features of the t.rex!
š: 0 ā©: 1
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to SpinozillaRex [2014-10-21 17:47:35 +0000 UTC]
I tried to give it a neutral expression, but I guess T.rex'es are just bad bitches B)
Jokes aside, thank you for your words, mean much
š: 0 ā©: 0
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to AlexSone [2014-10-21 17:32:00 +0000 UTC]
Glad you think so!
š: 0 ā©: 0
EdaphosaurusPogonias In reply to ??? [2014-10-21 17:02:31 +0000 UTC]
I actually think the reserved, calm Tyrannosaurus is more terrifying than the mad, murderous depictions. It shows the unpredictability of the animal, as you don't know what it is thinking, which is more scary than knowing that it is angry. Also, the hiding of the hands in the feathers is also a nice, logical touch.
š: 0 ā©: 1
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to EdaphosaurusPogonias [2014-10-21 17:14:08 +0000 UTC]
Indeed, you never what to expect from it.Ā :S
Thank you for your comment!
š: 0 ā©: 0
Eurwentala In reply to ??? [2014-10-21 16:30:57 +0000 UTC]
Cool, and really scary! I like how the forelimbs are completely invisible here.
š: 0 ā©: 1
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to Eurwentala [2014-10-21 16:44:08 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, comment very appreciated!
š: 0 ā©: 0
Saberrex In reply to ??? [2014-10-21 16:28:37 +0000 UTC]
very, very impressive. that's certainly not a creature i'd want to meet under any circumstance.
š: 0 ā©: 1
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to Saberrex [2014-10-21 16:44:53 +0000 UTC]
Who would? Under that fluffy look hides a powerful predator
š: 0 ā©: 1
bigthundermax99 In reply to ??? [2014-10-21 15:59:55 +0000 UTC]
nice, but for me those feathers are too long
š: 0 ā©: 1
Eurwentala In reply to bigthundermax99 [2014-10-21 16:31:49 +0000 UTC]
Well, as we have absolutely no evidence about the feathers of Tyrannosaurus, it's all a matter of taste.
š: 0 ā©: 2
IbenTesara In reply to Eurwentala [2014-10-22 06:12:13 +0000 UTC]
There's no direct evidence. There's enough indirect evidence though.
š: 0 ā©: 1
Eurwentala In reply to IbenTesara [2014-10-22 06:40:09 +0000 UTC]
Umm, no.
There's exactly one tyrannosaurid with preserved feathers, which lived fifty million years and half a world apart, and you're making claims about such a highly plastic trait as feather lenght based on that? Just doesn't make sense. Besides, the feathers are only a third longer than in Yutyrannus - 30 cm versus 20 cm. For an animal four times larger.
š: 0 ā©: 1
IbenTesara In reply to Eurwentala [2014-10-22 08:30:20 +0000 UTC]
Oh no no, I misread your comment ! I thought you said there was absolutely no evidence at all for feathers on Tyrannosaurus. It's my bad, my apologies !
š: 0 ā©: 1
Eurwentala In reply to IbenTesara [2014-10-23 08:34:56 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I see. Sorry about that then. Yeah, you're right about that, there sure is enough indirect evidence Tyrannosaurus had feathers.
š: 0 ā©: 0
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to Eurwentala [2014-10-21 16:45:59 +0000 UTC]
As I stated in the descriptions, the feathers are averagely 30cm (15inches) long. The T.rex is just very bulky. That plus feathers, here, you have long looking feathers, although they're not really.
š: 0 ā©: 0
IbenTesara In reply to ??? [2014-10-21 15:42:10 +0000 UTC]
I'm so happy to see a decent and really realistic Tyrannosaurus. Especially without naked thighs ! That seems to be a very common thing when it comes to restoring big theropods with feathers, using the "ostriches are big and they have naked thighs so all big theropods should have naked thighs as well !" reasoning. This totally doesn't make sense at all, and there's more evidence to support what you showed here than an ostrich-like Tyrannosaurus.
I also love the fact that the head is naked, but not scaly. Which totally would make sense, modern birds don't have scales on their heads when their heads are featherless, they have this naked and wattly and bumpy skin. It's just perfect and how it should be when restoring it this way.
Totally digging the "arms are hidden underneath the feathers" as well, it really makes it look life-like. Well done, really well done !
š: 0 ā©: 2
Durbed In reply to IbenTesara [2014-10-21 17:29:26 +0000 UTC]
That reasoning sort of make sense when it comes to big speedy theropods (such as ornithomimosaurs or albertosaurs), for the same reason that ostriches have naked thighs: to prevent overheating. It wouldn't be the case of T. Rex though, and most other big theropods.
š: 0 ā©: 0
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to IbenTesara [2014-10-21 16:20:20 +0000 UTC]
You got most of the points I'm making with this, very glad you consider it this way!
Once again, thank you
š: 0 ā©: 0
Koeskull In reply to ??? [2014-10-21 14:40:13 +0000 UTC]
That's cool, very interesting! I never thought that its arms might not be visible, but it makes sense.
š: 0 ā©: 1
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to Koeskull [2014-10-21 14:44:21 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! Indeed, I thought in this walking stance, the arms (or tiny wings) would be entirely tucked inside and covered by the feathers, their default position.
š: 0 ā©: 0
f14ace In reply to ??? [2014-10-21 14:38:39 +0000 UTC]
Science has ruined my childhood.
š: 0 ā©: 3
Dannyp96 In reply to f14ace [2014-10-21 21:53:01 +0000 UTC]
I'm sure people were thinking the same thing hundreds of years ago when they realized there wasn't an unknown world to explore once you sailed off the edge of the earth, and that the planet was in fact rather round. It would seem rather silly to cling to an entirely inaccurate view of the world, when the fact is it was rather different than what it once appeared to be.
š: 1 ā©: 0
MoriceMonkey93 In reply to f14ace [2014-10-21 14:42:47 +0000 UTC]
I've never been so linked to the memories... maybe hence my love for feathered dinosaurs. Maybe it's just me, but I just prefer dinosaurs as what they were (as much as we can know).
š: 0 ā©: 1
f14ace In reply to MoriceMonkey93 [2014-10-21 15:30:57 +0000 UTC]
I think feathered raptors are cool, but t-rex as a giant chicken just rubs me the wrong way for some reason.
š: 0 ā©: 3
ProcrastinatingStill In reply to f14ace [2014-10-25 15:51:56 +0000 UTC]
BTW look! eurwentala.deviantart.com/art/ā¦
š: 0 ā©: 0
ProcrastinatingStill In reply to f14ace [2014-10-21 23:14:18 +0000 UTC]
You gotta admit feathered Rex's are more creative than the lizard-like ones that have been done to death.
Also don't think of it as a chicken. I always saw them as having coat patterns like wild canids for some reasons.
š: 0 ā©: 1
Yutyrannus In reply to ProcrastinatingStill [2014-10-23 03:59:05 +0000 UTC]
Wild canids? Hmm...that's a cool idea, do you mind if I do that with my Albertosaurus picture?
š: 0 ā©: 0
SpinoInWonderland In reply to f14ace [2014-10-21 16:11:56 +0000 UTC]
Because chickens are the wrong birds to use as an analogy for Tyrannosaurus or any tyrannosauroid for that matter.
š: 0 ā©: 0
Koeskull In reply to f14ace [2014-10-21 14:40:44 +0000 UTC]
Science gave you t-rex in the first place.
š: 1 ā©: 0
<= Prev |