HOME | DD

octane2 — The Pleiades in Taurus

Published: 2006-10-25 16:05:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 22038; Favourites: 386; Downloads: 496
Redirect to original
Description Full view for maximum effect.

The Pleiades (M45) in Taurus

The Pleiades (Seven Sisters in Greek mythology) are the most famous of all the open star clusters. Approximately 500 stars adorn the black velvet sky. This first magnitude cluster is quite young and is easily visible to the naked eye. It somewhat resembles a smaller version of the Big Dipper. At least 6 hot blue stars are readily visible; those with trained eyes can see more.

Because of its large diameter (2 degrees), M45 is best seen in binoculars, or through a medium focal length telescope. A faint veil of nebulosity surrounds the brighest stars in the Pleiades, with the most easily seen patch being the Merope Nebula (IC 349), which surrounds the star Merope.

These reflection nebulae are not remnants of the gas cloud where the Pleiades were born, rather, they are just passing through interstellar dust and cloud.

The major stars which comprise the Pleiades have some beautiful names (Seven Sisters); Maia, Taygeta, Merope, Alcyone, Electra, Asterope and Celaeno.

In some ancient cultures, people would engage in ceremonies to honour the dead when the Pleiades had reached the highest point in the sky at midnight. Ancient Aztecs believed the Pleiades would be overhead at midnight the day the world would end.

This composite consists of one set of images; one set of 15 images taken at ISO-800.
Each individual image was a 240 second exposure.
IRIS was used to calibrate each image (dark subtraction [median combined master dark] and flat field division [median combined master flat {lights and darks}]), to register, align, and finally stack.
Photoshop CS2 was used to adjust levels, curves, saturation, colour balance, noise reduction, frame and resize the final composite.

Target: The Pleiades (M45) in Taurus
Date: Sunday, October 22nd, 2006
Time: First image: 02:45 AM
Time: Last image: 04:08 AM
Location: Coonabarabran, NSW, Australia
Camera: Canon EOS-350D
Telescope: Saxon ED80
Focal length: 600mm
Mount: Piggy-backed onto an 8" Meade LX90 LNT (F/10)
Autoguided: Through 8" Meade LX90 LNT (F/10)
Guider: Meade DSI-C
Alignment: Equatorial; via equatorial wedge
Exposure: 15 x 240 seconds @ ISO-800 (RAW)
Software: IRIS: Calibration, registration, stacking; Adobe Photoshop CS2: post-processing and framing
Related content
Comments: 180

gdpr-2744940 [2006-10-26 08:28:27 +0000 UTC]

*nods* As I said to you, breathtaking as always. I still can't believe the level of work that goes into your photographs. Truly stunning. I'll be looking forward to the next one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to gdpr-2744940 [2006-10-26 11:18:31 +0000 UTC]

L,

You're far too sweet.

I'm trying to work on the next image but am falling asleep. Perhaps over the weekend.

Thanks.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-2744940 In reply to octane2 [2006-10-26 12:27:55 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I know the feeling, I really need to catch up on some sleep, but that won't happen for a few weeks yet. Anyways good luck with it all!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to gdpr-2744940 [2006-10-27 00:29:56 +0000 UTC]

L,

How come you won't be getting much sleep? What's happening?

Weather permitting, I'll be going to the mountains this weekend for more shooting.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-2744940 In reply to octane2 [2006-10-27 07:28:21 +0000 UTC]

Oh nothing bad, just a busy couple of weeks. All my weekends are taken up. This weekend is especially flat out. I don't get back til 10:30 tonight, up early tomorrow morning. Saturday night I'm babysitting until twelve, then I have to get up early again, plus I miss sleep because of daylight savings.
What are you planning to shoot?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to gdpr-2744940 [2006-10-27 07:31:50 +0000 UTC]

L,

You busy bee!

I'm not entirely sure, yet. Possibly a galaxy, if my equipment behaves.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-2744940 In reply to octane2 [2006-10-27 07:40:10 +0000 UTC]

Ah yes, sadly we're all well acquainted with equipment failure. *rolls eyes* Sounds pretty already though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to gdpr-2744940 [2006-10-27 17:12:30 +0000 UTC]

L,

Unfortunately, I didn't gather enough data, and so am not proceeding any further with processing it. I only got 3x10-minutes worth.

I'll reshoot it tonight in the mountains, hopefully.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-2744940 In reply to octane2 [2006-10-28 04:24:14 +0000 UTC]

Oh now that's unfortunate. Nothing worse than expecting a good shot and finding out something has gone wrong.

Good luck shooting and stay warm!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to gdpr-2744940 [2006-10-29 10:56:54 +0000 UTC]

L,

It was freezing cold. Worse than winter.

I didn't shoot a damn thing. By the time I had all my technical issues worked out, it had clouded over. Shortly after the sun came up.

Next time.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-2744940 In reply to octane2 [2006-10-30 07:54:53 +0000 UTC]

You poor thing. Now that's dedication for you. Better luck next time I guess, as cliche as it sounds.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WaterNeko [2006-10-26 04:44:21 +0000 UTC]

*gasp* That's gorgeous! How do you manage such beautiful pictures?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to WaterNeko [2006-10-26 05:41:19 +0000 UTC]

WaterNeko,

With lots of love, patience and soul.

Thanks for the compliment.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterNeko In reply to octane2 [2006-10-26 12:38:02 +0000 UTC]

One of these days, I'll manage to create something beautiful as that....

And you're very welcome.^^ Keep up the good work, I want to see more of your photographs!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to WaterNeko [2006-10-27 00:29:26 +0000 UTC]

WaterNeko,

I'm in the process of selling off my equipment and upgrading to better equipment.

Once that happens, I will be taking a lot more photographs.

I'm even looking at getting a hydrogen alpha filter which will facilitate black and white photography (of hydrogen gas), even in moonlight.

I can then later on add the black and white data to my colour data (can be taken on different nights) and it will make the images pop a whole lot more.

Thanks again for your kind words.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZandraSaiquies In reply to ??? [2006-10-26 01:36:30 +0000 UTC]

octane2,

amasing eye. this is beautiful. absolutly beautiful.

-ZS

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to ZandraSaiquies [2006-10-26 01:53:22 +0000 UTC]

ZandraSaiquies,

Thank you for the very kind compliment.

I'm glad that you enjoyed the image.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Demoneyes14 [2006-10-26 00:03:12 +0000 UTC]

Omygod, i LOVE the Pleiades! Back when my telescope wasn't broken, i would always try and focus on them.
but this is beautiful beyond compare

Awesome job

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to Demoneyes14 [2006-10-26 01:09:42 +0000 UTC]

Demoneyes14,

Fix your telescope!

Thank you for the very kind words.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Demoneyes14 In reply to octane2 [2006-10-26 17:47:20 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome, and i really do wish my telescope was fixed.

I'm curious to know if you ever had pictures of the planet parade a few years ago. That was the last real thing i looked at through the telescope before it got broken

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to Demoneyes14 [2006-10-27 00:27:31 +0000 UTC]

Demoneyes14,

What type of telescope is it, and what happened to it?

What was the planet parade? Was it an occultation of some kind?

The other night we had Mercury, Jupiters, Pluto and the Moon in occultation.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Demoneyes14 In reply to octane2 [2006-10-27 17:29:35 +0000 UTC]

Octane2,

The planet parade was an occasion that happens every couple of hundred years where a large number of the visible planets can be seen clustered together. For a period of a few weeks, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn could be seen in the west part of the sky, which made it very easy for them to be located.

As for my telescope, i'll get back to you on what kind it actually is, but i've had it for about five years and its been broken for about two if i'm not mistaken. It was left in the basement when not in use (which was very uncommon) and wasn't placed properly on the tripod. It fell over and the eyepiece is now misaligned and is in need of serious repair. Nothing else is wrong with it, but it seriously needs some work done on it. I can assure you it was a fairly decent telescope; powerful enough to see the rings of saturn, and possibly more than that. It also had a place to plug a laptop into it and program it and have it aim for a certain star cluster or galaxy, but i was never given the opportunity to try it. the telescope does mean a lot to me, because its the first one i've ever gotten and still worthy of stargazing (if it weren't in need of repair that is)

Sincerely yours,
D14

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to Demoneyes14 [2006-10-27 17:56:49 +0000 UTC]

Demoneyes14,

We just had one this week; Jupiter, Mercury and the Moon!

The one that you're referring to, I'm most certain I've seen photographs of that. That would have been spectacular.

I'd love to know what kind of telescope it is. It sounds like a Maksutov-Cassegrain, by Meade.

Get it fixed, and get out there and gaze.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Demoneyes14 In reply to octane2 [2006-10-27 22:25:21 +0000 UTC]

Octane,

you are correct, it is a Meade. but it says 'Multi Coated' and from the digital series

And its been a while since i've taken a look at it. I took the eyepiece off and its collected quite a bit of dust.
Its in my bedroom now... I think i might have my dad fix it.

Thanks a lot

Sincerely,
D14

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to Demoneyes14 [2006-10-29 10:55:36 +0000 UTC]

Sedona (God, I hope that is your name),

Is the front (primary) corrector lens a purple colour? If so, that's what is "multi-coated".

Sounds to me like a DS-series telescope. Is it white or blue?

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Demoneyes14 In reply to octane2 [2006-10-29 13:51:57 +0000 UTC]

Its white... but its a little dark to see what colour the lens is.
I tried blowing the dust off the lens and it got in my eyes. That shows how long its been sitting there. And it makes me really sad to think about it.
Youo're probably right about it being the DS series though. This is my first and only telescope, so i don't know much about them myself.

I also recently bugged my dad about it, and when i asked when i could get it fixed and if he could help me, he pulled the usual parental reply: "I don't know". I started getting persistant and he called me an asshole. So i don't think i'll be getting it fixed anytime soon.

Sincerely,
Sedona (yes, sadly that is my real name)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

verty In reply to ??? [2006-10-25 23:27:09 +0000 UTC]

bloody amazing!!
i have family in Orange and i wanna try a shot like this.. but i wouldnt have any clue how 2 do it!!!

might just try a star delay shot out in the country there tho

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to verty [2006-10-26 01:09:40 +0000 UTC]

verty,

Stick your camera with a telescopic zoom lens on it and let it expose. Star trails would look nice on this region.

Thanks for the compliment.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

netsui In reply to ??? [2006-10-25 22:24:12 +0000 UTC]

You are truly a master of your craft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to netsui [2006-10-26 01:09:37 +0000 UTC]

netsui,

You flatter me so.

I have a long way to go, yet.

Thank you for compliment.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

netsui In reply to octane2 [2006-11-01 22:59:28 +0000 UTC]

Even if you have a long way to go, what you do is still superb.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

immortaldesigns In reply to ??? [2006-10-25 22:09:28 +0000 UTC]

This is just awesome! I'm always so speechless when looking at your photos... they're always so breathtakeing.
I've always had a soft spot for this cluster of stars, in fact i'm painting them at the moment

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to immortaldesigns [2006-10-26 01:09:34 +0000 UTC]

immortaldesigns,

Your words are too kind.

I'd love to see your finished painting of the Pleiades.

Thank you.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terceleto In reply to ??? [2006-10-25 21:58:04 +0000 UTC]

absolutely astounding! After reading your tutorial of the processes and stages you go through to create these beautiful images it's even easier to appreciate the capture. Very nicely done - and I do agree with you, the stars of the Pleiades do have gorgeous names - and very fitting for them indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to terceleto [2006-10-26 01:09:31 +0000 UTC]

isiriu,

Thank you for the kind words.

Most of the names of stars are Arab in origin as the Islamic empire studied astronomy in great detail. This one's different, having Greek names.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MuseSusan In reply to ??? [2006-10-25 21:36:55 +0000 UTC]

Yay! It's been a while since your last photo, but this is worth the wait!

Recalling your explanation of how you produce these composites, I'm surprised to see so much "noise" in parts of the image, in what should look like black sky between the stars. I thought your work with the black frames took care of that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to MuseSusan [2006-10-26 01:09:28 +0000 UTC]

Susan,

Thank you for the most kind words.

I was just commenting with my friend Louie who I went imaging with that I don't have a high turnover of images. I guess I try to focus on quality over quantity.

You're right about the background in this image. I intentionally left it brighter so that the outer nebulosity was visible. Ideally, I'd prefer to have the background near-black. I may end up reprocessing it to make the sky a bit darker.

The other reason why there is a higher level of noise in this image is that each exposure was four minutes in duration.

It's next to impossible to remove all aberrations and noise, we can only do so much.

Thanks.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MuseSusan In reply to octane2 [2006-10-26 04:26:25 +0000 UTC]

Hey, no one can argue with quality over quantity! :-D

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to MuseSusan [2006-10-26 05:40:44 +0000 UTC]

Susan,

Just you wait until you see my next image. I have a feeling it's going to be a corker.

I will begin processing it tonight.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MuseSusan In reply to octane2 [2006-10-27 05:40:09 +0000 UTC]

Yay! I can't wait to see it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to MuseSusan [2006-10-27 17:12:47 +0000 UTC]

Susan,

Unfortunately, I didn't gather enough data, and so am not proceeding any further with processing it. I only got 3x10-minutes worth.

I'll reshoot it tonight in the mountains, hopefully.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MuseSusan In reply to octane2 [2006-10-28 06:09:21 +0000 UTC]

Ooh, too bad. Well, I hope it goes well this time around! (You don't need me to say it, but don't rush it just because people want to see your new work--we're quite willing to wait until it's perfect!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to MuseSusan [2006-10-29 10:57:27 +0000 UTC]

Susan,

No luck last night, again.

By the time I had ironed out my technical problems, it had clouded over, and the sun then came up shortly.

Next time.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BronnyO [2006-10-25 21:29:17 +0000 UTC]

That's beautiful. And thanks for the information too. It really adds to the image.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to BronnyO [2006-10-26 01:09:22 +0000 UTC]

Bronwyn,

Thank you for the kind words. I'm glad you liked it.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dunadan-from-Bag-End [2006-10-25 20:05:55 +0000 UTC]

perfect... I didn't know that there is any nebulae in Pleiades...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to Dunadan-from-Bag-End [2006-10-26 01:09:19 +0000 UTC]

Dunadan-from-Bag-End,

It's not easy to see the nebula as it isn't an emission/diffuse-type, it's a reflection nebula.

Thanks.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dunadan-from-Bag-End In reply to octane2 [2006-10-26 09:26:53 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I know it cannot be seen with eye - it can be seen only in photos. But still... I didn't know that there is any thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kokone [2006-10-25 17:47:56 +0000 UTC]

WHOA! you used the almighty fishing line to get the diffraction patterns?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

octane2 In reply to Kokone [2006-10-26 01:09:16 +0000 UTC]

Kokone,

Yes, I used fishing lines.

Regards,
H

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>