HOME | DD
oupelay β Courtesy in the subway
Published: 2010-04-24 19:03:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 102871; Favourites: 1249; Downloads: 806
Redirect to original
Description
Such a polite young lady
I got that idea after seeing this drawing by : [link]
Related content
Comments: 140
Thanks man! Glad you like it!
π: 0 β©: 1
no problem man youΒ΄re awesome
π: 0 β©: 0
oh..i love the big bottoms...Excellent image !
π: 1 β©: 2
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks Valentina! Very glad you like it
π: 0 β©: 0
Other than the big girl's feet looking awkwardly positioned for some reason 
π: 0 β©: 2
Ok, I was only focussing on her legs, so I decided to change it as much as possible. Do you think it looks better now?
π: 0 β©: 1
It looks good to me.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks! I wanted to give the big girl a shy pose, but at the end, the position of her feet just look awkward... I doubt I could fix it now.
π: 0 β©: 0
Karine and I have something in common! We love big bootys! :3
π: 0 β©: 1
Then were are three of a kind
π: 0 β©: 1
Four!
Though I'm more into big bellies. ^.^;
π: 0 β©: 1
Better make room for the club, for I would be number Five!
π: 0 β©: 1
not bad, great colouring but you need to work on fat weight more, it seems her lower body is just that shape with no weigh on the fat at all, just jutting hips which look pretty unrealistic, unless thats what you were going for.
great job, good to see some work from you after so long
hope my criticism wasn't too harsh
π: 0 β©: 1
I have to admit I like to associate my big girls with a sort of strenght. I guess that's why I sometimes exagerate the shapes, without putting enough weight in it. More a choice than anything else.
π: 0 β©: 1
I ain't complainin. I lubs me some hips and ass!
π: 0 β©: 1
same, but I also like aiding artists in improving they're abilities
π: 0 β©: 0
O____O
Girl, I doubt she usually really sits down at public transports, 'cos she'll take more than one seat, and even if she did, then you'd get all buried under that wide soft bu...
... Ooooh! Nevermind.
π: 0 β©: 1
and who said chivalry is dead
π: 0 β©: 2
Chivalry is bad.
But there are two girls in this picture so it's ok.
π: 0 β©: 1
i believe your retarded
π: 0 β©: 1
Really? Why do you believe this? Chivalry is sexist to both parties and heavily outdated, and so should not be encouraged, but seeing as the social situation in this image involves two people of the same sex, the normal issues do not apply.
π: 0 β©: 2
Chivalry is only sexist when either side takes it too seriously.
π: 0 β©: 1
agreed as well it can never die why becuase we are still expected to open doors and that to show we love or respec our girl and they will not let it die eather there will awalys be a gilr who wants their car door open or to be treated like that but realy their being treaded well is that such a bad thing?
π: 0 β©: 0
I think your confused about the word
[link]
π: 0 β©: 1
I know what it means, and it's sexist. To support chivalry and related practices is to accept the woman as a lesser creature to be protected and apply responsibilities to the man simply because of his physical sex.
When Chivalry occurs between two people of the same sex, however, or towards a group of people indiscriminately, or in a manner that is easily reciprocated, it is not chivalry, but simply politeness, and therefore just fine.
π: 0 β©: 1
your missing the point, its about an honor code, its not about women being inferior... words change in meaning
π: 0 β©: 1
The honour code exists in line with an outdated view of the world. The belief that women are inferior is not a staple of the code, but it is one of the factors that created it in the form it exists in today. The word 'Chivalry' is an extrapolation of 'Cavalry' because the code was expected of such military peoples as were deemed important enough to ride a horse. The code stemmed from their default orders to remove civilians from danger scenes- Women and children first, because they were deemed weaker and less able to defend themselves.
In this time of sexual equality, however, it is stupid to continue to uphold these silly beliefs and all it serves to do is encourage feminazis to think that they can overthrow a male-chauvinistic society whilst still retaining the few inequal priveliges that society bestowed on them.
π: 0 β©: 2
Talk about men being the destructive gender in the human race, why don't we explain to all the dumb womynists that there is no need to destroy the belief but to just update it to fit in with our culture today?But these womynists are not rational or pragmatic, they think because they can speak in a snide, snotty, and self-righteous tone that people will find them intelligent. I'm not saying that women are stupid and that they shouldn't oppose society being dominated by my gender. I support it, I just highly suggest that loudmouthed, dumb bitches not be the ones to try to do it.
π: 0 β©: 0
you really don't get, and you just started arguing for no real reason, Chivalry(or whatever you wanna call it) is dead cause people like you killed it, I still have honor, I hold the door open for people, I preform good deeds with no expectations of any gain
also your starting to sound like glen bleck
π: 0 β©: 1
I hold the door open for people, but not because of any quality they possess, simply for their convenience. Similarly if somebody in my party reached the door first, I would expect them to hold it open for me, regardless of my or their age, sex, colour or creed (the obvious exception being if they were somehow physically unable to).
It is people like you who hang on to traditional social values and drive down our chances of finding an equal society. People have to see the boundaries between them and others broken down in ALL ways to understand the significance and ramifications of equality, not just the removal of bad things done to others. You aren't helping by deluding yourself that adhering to social values from less enlightened times makes you a good person. That's how religion gets started.
Honour, in its barest sense, is about maintaining social appearance as to what is acceptable. It therefore directly impedes any social advance, and so should be discouraged.
...
I do not know nor care who Glen Beck is, and frankly I don't see why I should care if I sound like them.
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev |