HOME | DD

porcelainespresso In reply to ??? [2009-10-25 19:39:27 +0000 UTC]

Nowadays, I suppose some people don't care about people being homosexual or lesbians because people just don't care or they think "love triumphs all".
Going into religion... we could talk about that if you'd like.
And it could hurt their family or their friend, if they don't accept their son/daughter/friend in being homosexual/lesbian.

Anyways, I don't wanna start a riot here or anything.
If you'll be willing, I'd like to stop this "argument" right here or after you reply. I don't want to "spam" this artist's page.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

philly In reply to porcelainespresso [2009-10-25 21:30:48 +0000 UTC]

I think someone who is homosexual would probably care little about "hurting their friends or family" by openly displaying their sexuality / who they are especially considering if they dont accept them for who they are. I think its more hurtful to the individual to have close minded family and friends who disown them for who they are attracted to and who they choose to love rather then their family be hurt by a display of open homosexuality.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

philly In reply to ??? [2009-10-25 09:32:18 +0000 UTC]

haha tell that to the bible thumpers. i was also mainly referring to the action rather then the two individuals. i think that a large majority of people in the US are very uncomfortable with sexuality and therefor have problems with photos like this even though its not really pushing the "limits" at all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fiskit In reply to philly [2009-10-25 12:00:18 +0000 UTC]

Ah, I understand. Sorry for the misinterpretation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

philly In reply to Fiskit [2009-10-25 21:36:53 +0000 UTC]

haha no i think you got it right. it isnt hurting anyone, except those people who feel like its their business to push their beliefs on others.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Paroxsym In reply to ??? [2009-10-23 23:40:09 +0000 UTC]

D: I don't see anything wrong with it. I think it's adorable.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Javado In reply to Paroxsym [2009-10-25 19:40:07 +0000 UTC]

There's nothing wrong with it at all, but I guess some ignorant people beg to differ

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paroxsym In reply to Javado [2009-10-25 20:12:22 +0000 UTC]

Oh well. D: They can think whatever they want, it wont change how people feel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tenshi-hatake In reply to Paroxsym [2009-10-24 11:25:53 +0000 UTC]

It's not exactly 'socially-acceptable', but it isn't a huge deal either.

And there is no need to censor this. At all.
It's just art

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paroxsym In reply to tenshi-hatake [2009-10-25 00:33:59 +0000 UTC]

Unfortunately so..
Yeah, if they dont like it, they dont have to look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EbolaSparkleBear In reply to ??? [2009-10-23 20:30:20 +0000 UTC]

Because dummies will say anything no matter how stupid they are Go Phillies!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

baer-7 In reply to ??? [2009-10-23 15:38:12 +0000 UTC]

everyone is hiding the next category ... pls call for explanation

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

B-l-u-e-y In reply to ??? [2009-10-23 15:37:33 +0000 UTC]

Mature filther PLSS !!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 15

RedeemerHunter In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2011-09-09 21:11:16 +0000 UTC]

agreed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OverdozeCreatives In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2010-06-05 06:21:45 +0000 UTC]

Its just a kiss ?
i bet if you go to an kindergarden, you will catch some sneaky fellaz that kiss ^^


anyway, amazing shot
imma' fav it ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

floggerSG In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-28 20:32:39 +0000 UTC]

Seriously? Mature filter?
You must have been sheltered as a little one, to be weary of kissing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mortmortmorty In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-25 06:36:11 +0000 UTC]

they could at least have a warning for 'sexual themes'

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mortmortmorty In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-25 06:27:40 +0000 UTC]

i think people are out of line commenting on what you said. i kind of agree with you, since there is a very sexual overtone in this photo, even though it is wonderfully done, and beautiful.

but you're right, there ARE kids on here, even if they're not mature enough to be. there are often warnings/filters on artistic nudes as well. don't be discouraged by what people are saying. that's why we have art. for people to express. but other people say things they shouldn't.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

paramore-luvah In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-24 15:16:23 +0000 UTC]

Jeeze due, chill the heck out.
We all know this has nothing to do with the fact that it's a "kiss"
Truth is, you'd have no problem with it if it were a man and a woman.

Take your homophobic comments somewhere else.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Two-Tailed-Moon In reply to paramore-luvah [2009-10-25 02:35:19 +0000 UTC]

Well said. I'm surprised other people aren't pointing this out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

paramore-luvah In reply to Two-Tailed-Moon [2009-10-25 02:58:22 +0000 UTC]

I thought for sure i wasnt the only one to say this.
but...i guess i am. lol.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tessiursa In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-24 10:21:15 +0000 UTC]

LMFAO.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jade-storm In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-24 00:51:47 +0000 UTC]

what are you, some far right mormon extremist from the 20s? jesus...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bsienk In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-24 00:23:15 +0000 UTC]

Whoa. You're a creeper. I honestly believe that no art should never be censored, and I don't care about kids seeing it. Kids shouldnt even know how to use a the internet. If you don't like something don't look at it. this is a very artistic and very beautiful picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Paroxsym In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 23:38:31 +0000 UTC]

It's a very sweet kiss. I'm sure you'll be fine, my friend.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dreaming-disaster In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 22:30:29 +0000 UTC]

xD lol nice icon

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zombie-Graves In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 21:06:39 +0000 UTC]

You serious? God forbid you see ACTUAL mature content.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

heroic-autobot In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 18:26:18 +0000 UTC]

This guy is possibly arabic, that could explain his cultural shock, bue easy pal, it's totally normal in western cultures (and I bet in the rest of the world too, but not for arabics, jo).

And it's no racism,just a possibly cultural explanation, that's nothing wrong in that, the guy has his rights to complain and be answered too.

For me, it's simple... passion, kind, beauty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

B-l-u-e-y In reply to heroic-autobot [2009-10-23 18:30:10 +0000 UTC]

Thx man but Im not one of them.
My sister on DA.Lets call it Im a bit protective.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

michellekp In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-24 09:21:03 +0000 UTC]

one of them? wtf is that supposed to mean

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

B-l-u-e-y In reply to michellekp [2009-10-24 09:25:37 +0000 UTC]

some one called me arab I said Im not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

michellekp In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-24 09:27:34 +0000 UTC]

i know what they called you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EbolaSparkleBear In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 20:29:19 +0000 UTC]

Not protective, over-reactive. She doesn't have to click on anything she doesn't like and the photo is NOT a mature subject.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

B-l-u-e-y In reply to EbolaSparkleBear [2009-10-23 20:45:01 +0000 UTC]

I really bored talking about this I said point taken End of the line.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

heroic-autobot In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 19:39:45 +0000 UTC]

I understand you perfectly, I'm too a protective guy (i'm a father and an uncle of two little girls), but I prefer educate than hide

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

B-l-u-e-y In reply to heroic-autobot [2009-10-23 19:59:41 +0000 UTC]

Point taken.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lullabie In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-24 06:37:33 +0000 UTC]

Actually I know a fair amount of Arabic (mostly Moroccan) people, and I have seen them kiss full on the mouth for nothing more than a hello... even two guys. /shrug

But I fully agree... nothing wrong with this pic ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EbolaSparkleBear In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 17:24:22 +0000 UTC]

No need for the filter, there is nothing wrong with the photo.

No nudity, no violence, no extremism.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LwltGr In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 15:53:55 +0000 UTC]

mature? in a kiss?
hahah...
I think is a good work, I need to kiss someone now xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

B-l-u-e-y In reply to LwltGr [2009-10-23 16:19:52 +0000 UTC]

Mature is not in a kiss its in age.
We got kiddos in here REMEMBER ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 10

unstuck-in-time In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2010-01-09 00:19:29 +0000 UTC]

If it were a guy and a girl, you wouldn't be having a tantrum.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sajra71 In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-11-21 22:55:12 +0000 UTC]

So? I doubt there are kids here young enough not to understand this stuff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Guymer In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-24 10:00:06 +0000 UTC]

I don't have a problem with a child seeing a photo of a kiss. You see people kissing when you walk down the street...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Anonsays In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-24 00:03:12 +0000 UTC]

And no one wants to see children kiss. That's just weird. O____o

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shotgunpoopie In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 23:54:49 +0000 UTC]

Oh for God's sake...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LeoDaniels In reply to Shotgunpoopie [2010-04-30 04:32:52 +0000 UTC]

It's an amazing picture but I mean a kiss really?>?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

extraintelegence In reply to B-l-u-e-y [2009-10-23 20:17:16 +0000 UTC]

And that's why DA has filters. Those "Kiddos" don't have to worry so long as the filters are on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Guymer In reply to extraintelegence [2009-10-24 09:59:42 +0000 UTC]

I don't have a problem with a child seeing a photo of a kiss. You see people kissing when you walk down the street...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

iPeony In reply to extraintelegence [2009-10-23 23:37:07 +0000 UTC]

i'm sorry also but if you can be classified as a 'kiddo' you probably shouldn't be on here haha

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

extraintelegence In reply to iPeony [2009-10-24 15:30:51 +0000 UTC]

Tell that to him, not me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1