HOME | DD

MrLock In reply to juiceboxy [2012-10-27 12:03:48 +0000 UTC]

A lot of them granted, but fourtunatly not all.
The two here arent too bad I didnt think, at least their clothes arent exploding off them?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

juiceboxy In reply to MrLock [2012-10-27 17:55:32 +0000 UTC]

It's sad we have to resort to "Whelp, at least they're not naked!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

juiceboxy In reply to MrLock [2012-10-27 17:52:36 +0000 UTC]

It's sad we have to resort to saying "Whelp, at least they aren't naked!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrLock In reply to juiceboxy [2012-10-27 22:00:10 +0000 UTC]

Too true there

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GoldToaster In reply to juiceboxy [2012-10-26 08:14:37 +0000 UTC]

Sex symbols? In this picture?... What?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

juiceboxy In reply to GoldToaster [2012-10-26 22:22:45 +0000 UTC]

Lol@lowcut shirts/shortskirts

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

GoldToaster In reply to juiceboxy [2012-10-28 13:30:06 +0000 UTC]

Oh while I'm at it. [link]

Lol@Typical chick in one piece with big boobs and you're complaining about some made up chick with a short skirt. Man that's really hypocritical.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

juiceboxy In reply to GoldToaster [2012-10-28 13:59:31 +0000 UTC]

Lol@dude who went through my gallery and dug up art from over a year ago to prove a point.

1. Get a life
2. I'm talking about the publics perception of these things in society. Doesn't really change the truth.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GoldToaster In reply to juiceboxy [2012-10-28 14:02:31 +0000 UTC]

So you can draw girls in skimpy outfits but when somebody else does it you get all butthurt over it. lol ok

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

juiceboxy In reply to GoldToaster [2012-10-28 14:05:07 +0000 UTC]

Never said that?
Granted I took some artistic liberties back then, but that doesn't change my stance on it now.
I'm just saying its weird you had to resort to that XD I feel violated

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GoldToaster In reply to juiceboxy [2012-10-28 13:22:26 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry I'm not uptight about that subject so I really don't care much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

juiceboxy In reply to GoldToaster [2012-10-28 14:01:40 +0000 UTC]

Sure spent a lot of time going through my art for someone who doesn't care about the argument .-.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

juiceboxy In reply to GoldToaster [2012-10-28 13:59:44 +0000 UTC]

What?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OG--san In reply to juiceboxy [2012-10-26 05:05:16 +0000 UTC]

Because no one wants to watch a couple of bull-dyke walruses slapping blubber.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

juiceboxy In reply to OG--san [2012-10-26 22:22:03 +0000 UTC]

Sexism at it's best

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Blaisie In reply to juiceboxy [2012-10-26 04:59:22 +0000 UTC]

because. hot womens

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

juiceboxy In reply to Blaisie [2012-10-26 22:23:17 +0000 UTC]

You're so very thoughtful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blaisie In reply to juiceboxy [2012-10-26 23:23:12 +0000 UTC]

yes indeed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vyrilien In reply to rmj7 [2012-10-26 08:40:17 +0000 UTC]

No, that's awesome! Dynasty Warriors ftw!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rmj7 In reply to Vyrilien [2012-10-26 18:24:34 +0000 UTC]

FTW! ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SPARTANSLAYERR In reply to ??? [2012-10-26 01:01:25 +0000 UTC]

this is so epic!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Violet-Wynd In reply to ??? [2012-10-26 00:50:42 +0000 UTC]

Wow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lady-Arthemisa In reply to ??? [2012-10-25 23:41:18 +0000 UTC]

Amazing!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnnikaArt In reply to ??? [2012-10-25 23:40:47 +0000 UTC]

that looks awesome!!!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0