HOME | DD
scuzzo — For the children
[NSFW]
Published: 2009-01-16 12:08:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 15877; Favourites: 211; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
EnglishFor those of you that think that I forgot about the children!
Now seriously, this image was on the "Pioneer Plaque" that was placed on board the Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 space missions as a message from humanity. I can tell you that my version looks more "offensive" than the original illustration that showed the genitalia...
Note: Breasts for me, is not nudity. If a bare chested man is not nude, neither is a topless woman.
Español
Para aquellos de ustedes que piensan que me olvidé de los niños!
Ahora en serio, esta imagen estaba en la "Placa Pioneer" que fue puesta a bordo de las misiones espaciales Pioneer 10 y Pioneer 11 como un mensaje de la humanidad. Puedo asegurarles que mi versión se ve más "ofensiva" que la ilustración original en la que se veían los genitales...
Nota: Los senos, para mí, no son desnudez. Si un hombre sin camisa no está desnudo, tampoco lo está una mujer.
Illustrator
Related content
Comments: 148
this is funny but true in a way
nice to see someone who thinks that women's breast is not something to oogle at
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Someone brought up that everyone has nipples and some Seinfield quote I believe. Wouldn't that apply to butts as well? Not saying butts shouldn't be nudity or nipples should, but I don't think I understand the argument there...and butts are probably more equal between men and women than the nipples are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeah, you're right. I mentioned breasts here because this illustration in particular shows no butts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Once again, this is very straight and to the point. It certainly is rated E for Everyone, and I agree that a shirtless man is on the same level as a topless woman.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What is there to hide about oneself. To be free and have your mind open and far from being closed, to be natural as you were when you were a baby. Now that I think about, if the human body is seen as art and respected by all in a painting, why must people be so strict about it when you're actually doing it in public? Shows you what status society's in. All they can think about is how much it could display sexual tendencies and it not being natural.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
clothing and accesories are needed to show social status, if we were all naked how could you tell a rich from a poor?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wouldn't have to worry about, in that case we'd be equal in a certain aspect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh no, I was saying wouldn't have to worry about class.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Moraleja: Madurez implica entendimiento, si quieres que tus hijos no sean estupidos hay que enseñales directamente la verdad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nope, I'm the father of two girls, and even if I weren't I would like it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
When the day comes when we women can walk around without shirts, I'll be the first one in the streets
Born Free!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Why exactly IS nudity considered to be 'bad', anyway? (Besides for obvious sexual reasons.) I mean, everyone KNOWS about body parts, and HAS to see the other gender's some time in their life...It just makes no sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I can understand the "sexual themes" thing, but to "flag" nudity as "mature content" is simply stupid. As I've said, who would "flag" Michelangelo's David?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It can almost be like "flagging" humans ourselves, because we contain "mature content". (Even if we don't show it.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Why is sex considered to be bad?" is an interesting question as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I know, we all do it sooner or later, so it's a common thing for everyone
Not like it's brand new and no ones allowed to know about it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
finally, someone who sees we can have women naked as well, and not considered nudity! i get so annoyed when a woman is told off for taking her top off when i man can do it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yay! -cheers you on-
I also hate it when a woman gets chucked out of a cafe for breast feeding. its pathetic, its natural! -RANTS-
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's stupid! If someone tries to do that to my wife while she's breast feeding my baby girl I'll tear the place down. No one can be THAT retarded!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeh i know! i mean i understand if someone wasnt breast feeding but wtf if they are? why do they have to go the bathroom to do it? why dont the rest go? awr a baby girl! thats so cute.
i dont want kids though, cant stand normal girl things x3
Ill probally adopt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yesh it is! means a child can have a new mummy and daddy
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bad thing society teaches the opposite...but your ideas are true...and if they were true a lot of men would be really happy until they learned (and got used) to both sexes being topless as nothing to ashamed of...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
In many countries topless is accepted naturally... it's a matter of time
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, I hope it becomes true, so at least our daughters and descendants don't have to care about some worthless custom...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hey! that's strong language! hahaha
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I am still hung up
on the idea of nudity
being bad O.o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
do whatever you feel man, be happy
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No really why is being
naked a bad thing, it
confuses the hell out
of me O.o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't think it's a bad thing!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No no I did not
say you did sorry
to confuse >.<
it is people in
general, Just seeking
commiseration
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gracias, ahora que probé un cachito la "popularidad" me imagino el bolonqui que tendrás de mensajes viendo la cantidad de visitas diarias que tenés!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Si, un poco sí, a veces ní llego a contestar a muchos y últimamente hice un parate con mi página, me tengo que poner al día.
El trabajo me agota!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>