HOME | DD

SHADO-Commander — Kim Possible test

Published: 2013-04-08 06:14:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 1238; Favourites: 6; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description WHat's the sitch? For those who've been wondering where I've been lately, I've been swamped... not just with work, but also with learning the basics of 3D for an upcoming project. I did managed to sneak a little Kimmie goodness into the study process though, and since it's unlikely anyone will see the image otherwise, here's my take on what KP would look like at the beginning of ATCOTS.
Related content
Comments: 2

kwh [2013-08-13 10:59:35 +0000 UTC]

Oh, and 4, can I suggest that perhaps some ab definition might be cool? I imagine that's very hard to render, but everybody loves a challenge

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kwh [2013-08-13 10:56:45 +0000 UTC]

Nicely done!

Two... no three... queries... 

1. Would you imagine Kim's face was so strikingly round? She's never struck me as being drawn with a round face and big eyes... it's not wrong or unrealistic or jarring or anything, just... I suspect it to not be canonical...  am I right?

2.   She's always drawn with small but ridiculously protruding conical breasts in the original cartoon, and the fact that that isn't merely a cartoonist affectation is reinforced because the other female characters don't get drawn with them. I mention this because the girl you have rendered has very strikingly unremarkably normal looking breasts. I don't know what you get when you try to turn the KP cartoon character's pointy chesticules into a plausibly photorealistic 3D render, but I'm going to guess that it's probably not unremarkable; I imagined as close to conical as physics & human biology allowed; perhaps she has a favourite brand of sports bra styled after Madonna's stage costume or something...   so again, it's not wrong or unrealistic or jarring or anything, just... I suspect it to not be canonical...  am I right?

3. I note no fly on her cargos, which does jar a little, no belt loops, and no 'utility belt'; that's definitely non canon, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0