HOME | DD
Published: 2008-12-29 19:38:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 38666; Favourites: 482; Downloads: 469
Redirect to original
Description
As a writer of prose, you may at some point to want to write about a character or characters which are paranormal. We could perhaps debate over the exact definition of the word ‘paranormal’, and some may prefer ‘supernatural’ - a word more closely associated with magic, whereas ‘paranormal’ tends to be taken to mean something outside the realms of science (though of course, it is not as clear-cut as that, and you may like to think that I am wrong in saying this).For the purposes of this guide, both ‘paranormal’ and ‘supernatural’ refer to conscious beings, not found in the animal kingdom, that differ in some way to what I controversially call ‘normal’ humans (some paranormal beings may be human, in part or in whole). To give some well-known examples: ghosts, vampires, witches, werewolves and mermaids all fall into this category. The details, of course, are up to the writer. If you think you are writing about a paranormal character, you almost certainly are.
Now for the important stuff! Whether you are writing a piece set in a fantasy world all your own, or you are writing a realistic story that happens to feature a ghost, the advice in this guide still applies.
1. Do your research.
This initial step, of course, applies to any writing. Even if you are creating a world that lives by your rules, constructed entirely in your own head, it is still a good idea to do some research. You may be writing about an original paranormal being born of your own imagination, in which case, it is still a good idea to familiarise yourself with some legends and folklore. It may very well inspire you. Your totally original paranormal being will be all the better for being born of a mind that knows its paranormal history.
If you are writing about a creature from established myth, then you need to research this creature. Perhaps, for example, you are writing about vampires. Everyone knows about vampires, right? Certainly - and the myths are probably familiar to you and your readers. You may not feel that you need to do any further research, and indeed, your story may be fine without it. But please, read up on your chosen creature anyway. You may discover a little-known rule that did not make it into most stories; or you may discover a forgotten legend from which you, or your characters, can take inspiration.
Besides the impact it will have on your writing, researching your paranormal being beforehand is a good idea because you will enjoy it. Presumably, if you are writing about a paranormal creature, you must have an interest in it.
Of course, you may decide to tweak the legends, and that’s fine - as long as you heed the advice in step three! As anyone can tell you, you need to know the rules before you can break them. However you plan to use the legends, do your research!
2. Consider your audience.
This step is ongoing throughout the writing process, of course, but this is where is starts. For the purposes of this guide, your audience is step two, but this is to assume that you already have a character in mind. If you have, you must then consider the audiences to which your characters are likely to appeal. Traditionally, for instance, mermaids and fairies appeal to little girls. You can play to stereotypes like these, and you might be well on your way to writing a successful story, but of course you don’t have to.
If you have an idea in mind, it is possible that you have an audience in mind too, in which case you will have to tailor your idea to that audience. Trying to write a story about fairies that appeals to boys, or to people over thirty, or to men in their late teens and early twenties is, in my opinion, a fine ambition. If you are going to attempt something like this, you will have to write very cleverly and very carefully, always remembering your target audience - and there is always a chance it may not work. So be prepared to reconsider your ideas if necessary.
Alternatively, it may be that you want to write for a particular age group, but still need to pick your paranormal being. It might even be that it is easier to start with an audience in mind, but no solid idea. You, then, are a more sensible writer than many of us! Rather than trying to tailor an idea to an audience, you can do some market research before you finalise any details about your story and character.
We have already considered little girls, and mermaids and fairies. Traditionally - or should I say stereotypically - a little boy would rather read about monsters and dragons. Again, you can play to the stereotypes, or you can deviate from them. What you decide to do will depend on your own ideals and ambitions, and I can only advise again that you remember your target audience. To give a practical example: if you wanted to write a story about fairies that would appeal to boys, an obvious idea would be to make the human protagonist a boy, and give him a set of circumstances that a boy would relate to.
I am finding it very easy to focus on children in this section, as there are such clear and precise ideas on the supernatural beings that they like to read about. Adults, perhaps, are less likely to be enticed by a front cover depicting a dragon or a mermaid - or even a more gender neutral creature, like an elf. Indeed, fantasy stories are currently dominating the children’s and young adult market, whereas stories with any fantasy element aimed at adults are harder to call to mind.
This is an interesting point to consider. Is there a reason why the supernatural appeals more to children and teenagers? If you want to write about a paranormal character that would appeal to adults, what exactly do you do? Whoever your target audience is, you must read up on their current market. If you want to write for anyone over nineteen, you will be able to find fiction on the supernatural for that age range - though I daresay not quite so easily as if you were looking in the children’s section of the bookstore, library or website. Offhand, I cannot think of any contemporary adult fantasy novels - but of course, there is always Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, and A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens.
The young adult market, meanwhile, is saturated with fantasy stories, and there is a particular interest at the moment in paranormal romance. Paranormal romance, just so that we are clear, is a story in which a human becomes romantically involved with a supernatural being. The explosion of fantasy stories in the children’s and young adult market began with J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series, and since then Stephenie Meyer has turned young people’s attention to paranormal romance with Twilight, and subsequent novels in the series.
Love it, hate it, or don’t really care one way or the other - Twilight is essential market research if you are going to write a young adult paranormal romance. (I would also recommend, in this genre, Generation Dead by Daniel Waters.) The critics who are kind to Meyer have touched upon a very interesting point, which I shall now paraphrase and then expand upon: they say that the strong supernatural element appeals to teenagers’ feelings of physical and emotional confusion and isolation. Young people will like the escapism of supernatural fiction, and many will relate to the emotional turmoil of the human character. This is a generalisation - not all teenagers are the same - but they are all growing up, and most of us have a hard time doing that. This is something to consider when writing for them, whether your characters are paranormal or not.
Like step one, this essentially comes down to research. You need to research your paranormal characters, and you need to research your market. Then you need to marry your findings in these two areas, in order to write the best story you can.
3. Construct your fantasy world.
Well, this is what all your hard work has been building up to. This part is fun, and it is tricky, and in order to be successful you have to get it just right. You have done your research, and you have an idea of what will appeal to your audience. Of course, if your fantasy world appeals to you, there is no reason why like-minded people shouldn’t like it. You’re ready to start writing.
I said earlier that we would, in step three, return to the point of altering the traditional myths surrounding certain paranormal beings. That time has come. You may have decided to follow all the old and established rules, or you may want to play around with them, as indeed Stephenie Meyer does with her vampire characters in Twilight (for one thing, they can go out into the sun). Justin Somper has tweaked the traditional vampire legends in his Vampirates series of novels, aimed at young adults. (I’m afraid that I can only recommend the first novel, Demons of the Ocean, which in my opinion is the only readable instalment before the series starts going rapidly downhill.) Somper has taken some traditional vampire legends, but changed or rejected others, creating his own set of rules for his own fantasy world (incidentally, his vampires cannot go into the sun).
My older brother has a keen interest in vampires, and is a traditionalist who does not like to see the legends altered excessively. I, on the other hand, am always interested to see new ideas and re-imaginings. Essentially, my brother and I reflect any readership; some people will like you changing the rules, if you choose to do so - or at least they won’t mind - and some will hate it. You can’t please everyone, no matter what you write, and first and foremost you must please yourself. Write your story as you see fit.
Before you start to write, you will have established a set of rules for your fantasy world inside your head. My advice is this: transfer them from your head to a notebook, rather than straight to your story. You may think your ideas are fabulous (and they probably are), and be tempted to pour everything out at once. This is a mistake. Whatever your subject, paranormal or otherwise, revealing everything all at once is a bad idea. A reader needs an incentive to keep on reading, and a character needs to learn throughout the story. You may not be able to resist revealing all your ideas in the first few pages, and that’s fine - it might even help you to clarify some points about your fantasy world. But once you have done it, it is a good idea to cut out any superfluous information immediately, and then store it somewhere until it is the right time to reveal it.
If you don’t have a lot of ideas before you start writing, you will be constructing your fantasy world as you go along, and that simply won’t work. Do reveal everything gradually, but you must know exactly what it is you want to reveal when the time comes. Not doing so will result in inconsistency. You can make up more or less anything you want for your own fantasy world, but whatever you do, be consistent! (One good thing I can say about Justin Somper, author of Vampirates, is that he has so far been consistent.)
Some writers believe the myth that there are no set rules in a fantasy world, and therefore they can write whatever they feel like at any time. I’m afraid it doesn’t work quite like that. The rules in your imaginary world will differ at least slightly from the rules in the world you normally inhabit, but there must be rules, and you must stick to them. If you fail to do so, admittedly you will be no different from many other writers. They may suddenly change rules, or make up a new one, for their convenience. It makes writing simpler - and then it’s only to easy for the writer to say that it’s his or her world, and he or she gets to decide the rules. But perhaps you yourself are annoyed by this; perhaps you have come to know and love a fictional world in which this has happened. It’s annoying, isn’t it? You do not want to annoy your fans - should you acquire any - in this way.
I’m sure you understand all that, but just to be certain, I shall give you an example. First, I must stress that I have nothing at all against Meg Cabot, and her novels in The Mediator series are some of my favourites of her works. There is, however, a small inconsistency in these novels which stands out. The main character, Suze, talks to ghosts - and fights them if she has to. In the fourth novel of the series, Young Blood, Suze comes up against the ghost of a woman who was once young and sexy. The ghost takes the form of this young and sexy woman, even though the woman died of old age. Only at this point - in book four of six - does Suze, in her narration, reveal that ghosts appear as the person was in his or her prime, and therefore is unlikely to look as the person did when he or she died. This is a very sudden revelation, mentioned when this particular character first appears, and then never again. Meanwhile, every other ghost appears to Suze looking the age that character was when he or she died. Perhaps Cabot could argue that all these characters died in their prime, but I personally would not be convinced. The rule is only ever mentioned once, when the plot needs it.
So, I say again: consistency is crucial. Establish the rules, introduce them into the story as naturally as you can and then stick with them throughout.
4. Finally: write, and revise as necessary.
When you are writing, it is important to bear in mind these three points - assuming you like my advice - but don’t worry too much about them until you come to revise your piece. First and foremost, you should be writing for yourself.
A summary of the main points.
1. Research your paranormal being of choice.
2. Pick your audience, and research the market.
3. Establish a set of rules, keep notes, and reveal everything at a sedate pace.
4. Be sure of the rules of your world, and be consistent.
A summary of the recommended reading.
The Mediator 1-6 by Meg Cabot
A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens
Twilight by Stephenie Meyer
Harry Potter 1-7 by J.K. Rowling
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
Vampirates: Demons of the Ocean by Justin Somper
Dracula by Bram Stoker
Generation Dead by Daniel Waters
This list is by no means exhaustive. There are, of course, a great many other texts featuring - or, indeed, starring - paranormal characters. But of course, you knew that. If you want to write about the supernatural, you must surely enjoy reading about it. As any good writer knows, if you don’t enjoy what you are doing, your reader won’t enjoy it.
Related content
Comments: 134
sii-kei [2010-08-20 17:05:24 +0000 UTC]
It may sound selfish, but I've never thought before of considering the audience when writing something. For me writing was just writing, that's why it was pleasant. But I do see your point.
Another thing besides what you mentioned that I find really helpful when writing longer prose in general (be it supernatural or not) is that you don't have to write chronologically. No, I don't mean jumping in time or having flashbacks, I mean this: say you have inspiration for certain events that happen later on on the story but you don't know how to begin it. Well then, leave the beginning as it is; write the fragments you are pleased with and gradually connect them, in time the rest will start popping in you head by itself.
And as a side note. I'm 18 and female, but funny enough, my main stories are from a 36-year old man's point of view. He himself is a normal human being, but he encounters immortals. Because I made him such a rational character, it always was an issue for me to turn his disbelief into supernatural into belief. In the end I pretty much left the whole scene ambiguous, otherwise it wouldn't work. Do you have any tips for introducing paranormal logically into a story seemingly normal so far? The immortality has been hinted, but only in a comical fashion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RA-Meenan In reply to sii-kei [2010-08-21 06:52:59 +0000 UTC]
I like your point about writing scenes out of order if the inspiration comes to you. I've done that a lot and find that it helps out with getting there if I know where I'm going.
And I know what you mean about writing from a point of view that isn't normally your own. I'm a 25 year old female, but most of my stories are written from older male points of view. (considering my characters live longer than normal Earthlings). Also, they aren't human. They are anthro, which makes it even more difficult.
Salman Rushdie, author of "Midnight's Children" once said in an interview that interviewers will always ask if your book is biographical. He said, "Always say yes because they will stop asking questions if you say no." I find that funny. How is a story about a 85 year old, young by his world's standards, white wolf learning how to wield a sword supposed to be biographical? It just doesn't make sense. XD People are strange.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ardentfem [2010-08-20 16:21:05 +0000 UTC]
Very pleasurable read -- although my stomach DID turn when Twilight was mentioned. I believe Stephanie Myers was a frequent rule breaker when it came to...well...all the excellent and lucrative rules you've written here and her fame was more of a fluke rather than an example for market research. I'll try and stick to her breaking your rules (which are wonderful and universal), rather than breaking the laws of great storytelling...
1. Myers has avidly denied reading stories or watching movies that involved vampire and werewolf characters, and it's clearly evident in her books. I can very much relate to your brother when you mentioned he doesn't like when authors stray far from folklore, -especially- when nothing seems solid in the rest of the story. Actually, Stephanie Myers barely creates a history for Bella Swan the HUMAN, let alone adherring to what we know about the supernatural. We know where Bella's from and how she came to Forks, but beyond that we don't know much about her...it seems her character comes to "life" through Edward. So Myers doesn't know human teenagers, or vampires, or werewolves.
2. She may have done some research on how to reach out to young teenage fans, but frankly, I think Myers made Bella Swan to merely motivate the story to bring in the REAL juice: Edward the savoir and his band of savoir siblings. Unlike a famed character like Sookie Stackhouse (gaining more notierty through HBO than Charlaine Harris' wonderful books) -- it's hard for a reader to imagine Bella even making it to her teenage years without being eaten. Her history doesn't matter, you see, Edward's does. Bella Swan is a pare character; she doesn't have a temper, she stands around unless activated by some stimulus, and trips over everything.
I would also like to mention Myers doesn't seem to value her fans, and here's why: she foreshadows with a BRICK. I truly think she has taken her readers for blundering idiots, because she nearly BEATS you over the head with a hint in 'chapter three' with what is bound to happen in 'chapter 25', but I digress. Back to the point, if she's reaching out to hormonal teenagers with Bella Swan, then Myers doesn't have a very high opinion of teenagers.
3. Approaching your third golden ticket of advice, I have to admit, I -liked- that Myers chose a place like Forks to set her story. It's cold, it's rainy, shrouded in mist, and ever-so-cloudy. In the first book, I was intrigued by the idea of a place where vampires could roam about in the day, making their legendary explosive deaths in the sun a non-issue. But that interest was stomped out repeatedly when I found out what happens when Edward -is- in the sun ::.
I was intrigued again when she brought up the werewolf story, and Myers was admittedly surprised when her fans -liked- Jacob, proving that she just drops in characters to move Bella and Edward along on a sea of stupid. Why -wouldn't- we like Jacob, Myers? Besides Bella's Dad, he is the only other character with -humanity-...but that was also stomped on when he became a possessive asshole in the other books. He basically became Edward with a pulse.
4. If Stephanie Myers didn't foreshadow like she was writing for id-jiots, knew a thing or two about CONFLICT, and wasn't trying to proliferate mormon propaganda through the world of the supernatural, I would say her status was earned rather than a lucky coincidence riding on the power of teenage hormones and vampire folklore.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
ardentfem In reply to Faol-Allaidh [2010-08-21 16:20:22 +0000 UTC]
LOL oh i love you as well
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Atrophy-Scene In reply to ardentfem [2010-08-21 01:09:29 +0000 UTC]
I approve of this comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RA-Meenan In reply to 13thFallenAngel [2010-08-21 06:54:36 +0000 UTC]
I completely agree. I'm glad someone else does too. XD The girl that is completely helpless, yet everyone, especially cute guys, fight to the death over her. >>
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MagpieVon [2010-08-20 15:30:34 +0000 UTC]
Okay...this is the Writing Major and Writing Tutor/Editor in me coming out...but your first line needs to be fixed, please. "As a writer of prose, you may at some point to want to write..."
Okay, on to a positive note. THIS IS GREAT! This is a fantastic resourse for anybody who writes fantasy novels (such as myself.) So thank you very much for doing this for your group and for the literature community here on deviantART. Do you mind if I add this to the "tutorials" section I have in the favorites in my group ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lady-Blackdove [2010-08-20 15:27:54 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic piece. I'm writing a paranormal anthology of short stories at the moment, and this is going to be of great help.
Thank you very much, congratulations on the Daily Deviation! It is well deserved.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kngfishergrl [2010-08-20 15:18:28 +0000 UTC]
My story revolves around a supernatural market. Has the idea been done before?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Teq-Uila In reply to Kngfishergrl [2010-08-20 22:16:02 +0000 UTC]
Hello, ~Kngfishergrl , just dropping by to help with your question if you're interested.
Do you mean an actual market, where items are sold?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kngfishergrl In reply to Teq-Uila [2010-08-21 02:29:30 +0000 UTC]
It's a market where dreams are sold.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Teq-Uila In reply to Kngfishergrl [2010-08-21 21:50:50 +0000 UTC]
Oh, that is a very original idea, I must say. Any of your stories about it that you have on dA, so I can read?
For finding out information about magical markets in literature, I will send you a note with some examples I know of. But your dream idea is new and interesting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kngfishergrl In reply to Teq-Uila [2010-08-22 02:24:45 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much! Here it be!
Link
I haven't really conceptualized it yet, but I'm basing it on the wet markets we have here in the Philippines. The difficult thing will be making it original and interesting enough to stand on its own. Based from the examples you gave me, the markets in other stories aren't really the central location.
Thank you so much for answering my questions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KT4HIMx [2010-08-20 14:14:42 +0000 UTC]
Thanks so much for the tips, you've helped me improve my writing immensely.
x
Also, congrats on the Daily Deviation ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zveruwka [2010-08-20 08:52:41 +0000 UTC]
2. Pick your audience, and research the market.
haha, nice, but its not literature then)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
j00ed In reply to zveruwka [2010-08-20 09:35:34 +0000 UTC]
Why not? Isn't commercially successful literature still literature? Or is quality always inversely proportional to popularity? Everyone has to start a book from somewhere, be that sudden ideas, dreams or, in fact, what [one thinks] most people would like to read at the moment.
Of course, doing everything just for the money involved isn't a good way to create art in general, but we're not talking about that extreme here, are we?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zveruwka In reply to j00ed [2010-08-20 10:20:08 +0000 UTC]
>most people would like to read at the moment.
this is not literature. this is trade.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
j00ed In reply to zveruwka [2010-08-20 10:28:05 +0000 UTC]
Wait a sec. When, at one moment, I wanted to read something about wizardry, I glanced over Harry Potter, which turned into an all-time favourite for me. We are driven by momentary impulses, and that is nothing bad.
Also:
literature (ˈlɪtərɪtʃə, ˈlɪtrɪ-): written material such as poetry, novels, essays, etc, esp. works of imagination characterized by excellence of style and expression and by themes of general or enduring interest
There's no reason why a society's momentary impulses shouldn't give rise to literary excellence. Once, less than half a century ago, a certain society's momentary impulses and fascination with the insane progress of technology gave rise to science fiction. Fast-forward a few years later, and that same society's fascination with Star Trek declared the official popularization of fanfiction.
So yes, what you like calling "trade" is, in fact, literature.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
zveruwka In reply to j00ed [2010-08-24 09:49:51 +0000 UTC]
Trade is trade, while literature is literature.
You can not compare Dostoevsky, Nabokov, Twain, Renault, Wilde, Pushkin, Salinger, etc. with Star Track, McDonalds or fantazy books, which were written "to get fast money", that is bulshit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
j00ed In reply to zveruwka [2010-08-24 10:35:45 +0000 UTC]
Literature is "trade" as long as it's sold. You know what, screw selling, literature is "trade" as long as it's shared.
trade [treyd], verb: the act or process of buying, selling, or exchanging commodities, at either wholesale or retail, within a country or between countries[...]
Those authors you mentioned were also part of this "trade" you're talking about. Although if I were you, I'd try to mention a couple of alive authors among the hordes of the dead, no offense.
Although I can technically compare anything with everything, I didn't compare books with giant food corporations of questionable ethics. And whether you like Star Trek or not, it is a very important part of the 20th century's culture. Frankly, I dislike it, but at least I recognize its value. Even indirectly, it has done a lot to the science fiction and fanfiction communities, which have spawned excellent pieces of literature. But I digress, Star Trek is but a single example among hundreds I could give, so I see no reason for us to cling onto it.
And are you implying there are no good fantasy books? Cause if you are, I'm officially out of this conversation.
I will state it again, hoping you will understand me (excuse the emphasis), WE. ARE. NOT. TALKING. ABOUT. PEOPLE. WHO. WRITE. EXCLUSIVELY. FOR. MONEY. Period. We are talking about taking into account the fact that you need to put food on your bloody table at the end of the day. We are talking about taking the readers' preferences into account when writing your book, because literature isn't all about the author, as most emo poets like to yell, it's about the audience too.
Readers and writers have a channel of communication that goes both ways, and, just like the readers choose and pick what works to read by employing the channel, writers can choose and pick what works to write.
Art is sold, "traded", so that artists can survive. So, when writing a book, an artist will choose a more popular central theme than another . That's how the real world works; if you don't like it, blame the Authorities .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RA-Meenan In reply to j00ed [2010-08-21 07:00:44 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for making this point. Literature and trade can be synonymous. MOST books that sell are written for a particular audience and written for the purpose of being published. There was a time when literature was considered ONLY a trade. You wrote because that was your livelyhood. Shakespeare didn't write because of the fun of it. He wrote to make money. Simple as that.
True literature can bridge the gap between good writing and selling well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
j00ed In reply to RA-Meenan [2010-08-24 11:03:21 +0000 UTC]
You're very welcome, even though it doesn't look like my message is getting across. Oh, well. At least you're here.
Now, I'd be very careful with the word "true" and its implications. In an ideal society, there wouldn't even be a gap between writing well and selling well, as the audience would buy good literature and reject bad literature. In real life however, being able to bridge such a gap isn't so much an indication of "truthfulness" or "genuineness" but more like an indication of good marketing and good luck.
I don't think I'm stating anything you don't already know, but, well, someone might take our little conversation a bit too literally and start believing literature that doesn't bridge the gap is somehow "untrue". I'm just sayin', I've seen it all. Better safe than sorry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lit-Twitter [2010-08-20 07:06:43 +0000 UTC]
Chirp, congrats on the DD, it's been twittered. [link]
In other news, I didn't know submissions to/for groups were DD fodder.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Memnalar In reply to Lit-Twitter [2010-08-20 11:36:37 +0000 UTC]
It's case by case for me. In this case, Rosey wrote it specifically for the group.
Anyway, no one has told me not to do it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
namenotrequired In reply to Lit-Twitter [2010-08-20 09:30:52 +0000 UTC]
I guess there's no 'original' of it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Angel-of-Radia [2010-01-08 04:56:10 +0000 UTC]
I have a question; I created my own type of characters from a type of god offspring. They do not live longer and only have a rune and eyes of different colors to show their difference from the normal humans. Do you know of any books or anything to read similar to this character idea?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
simplyprose In reply to Angel-of-Radia [2010-01-08 08:30:57 +0000 UTC]
That sounds like a very original idea - I'm afraid I cannot think of anything similar. I will continue to think it over, and let you know if anything comes to me, and if I go on to read anything like this idea I'm sure I'll remember you and let you know.
We wish you the very best of luck with your work. I am very sorry I couldn't help, but as I say, I'll keep thinking. The term 'god offspring' brought some Greek mythology to mind, so I guess that's the best recommendation I can offer for now.
Thank you for commenting, and for your question.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Angel-of-Radia In reply to simplyprose [2010-01-09 05:49:53 +0000 UTC]
The first faint inkling of the idea came from Runemarks by Joanne Harris. It's a fantasy book about the Norse gods and Thor's daughter Modi. I suppose I could continue to read fun books like that.
Thanks for the advice anyhow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
snowballchibikat [2009-12-14 02:38:10 +0000 UTC]
In regards to my previous comment:
I completely understand why you included Twilight as market research. I was simply suggesting you add a point about the dangers of changing the traditional definition of a supernatural creature too much to the point where it is no longer believable to your audience.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
snowballchibikat [2009-12-14 02:34:21 +0000 UTC]
I most certainly agree with the vast majority of this article; however, there becomes a point where there is too much tweaking to a legend and the character no longer fits into the category of that particular supernatural creature.
Since you used the example, I shall stick to Twilight. Now, traditional vampires, as we can all most certainly agree, fall into the following criteria: certain death (or at the very least a noticeable weakness) in the sunlight, able to be warded off by garlic or a crucifix, must ask permission to enter another's residence, able to be killed either with fire or a wooden stake through the heart (excluding sunlight, as I mentioned that first), require the blood of living things to stay alive themselves, shape-shift (usually into a bat), and have fangs. Looking at Meyer's version of vampires, they only adhere to one and a half of these: the requirement of blood and fire being a definite cause of death. I don't know about you, but this seems like far too extreme a twist of a definition to even remain in the original category. Sparkling like a diamond in the sun is not an adequate replacement for death and/or weakness. Although I will admit that quite a few of the original criteria have diminished in importance over time (the powers of garlic, asking for permission to enter, etc.), the weakness of vampires in the face of sunlight still remains as one of the most important guidelines of all time for this particular creature.
Now, for an appropriate example of "bending the rules," I shall use the Bunnicula books by James Howe. I enjoyed this series probably more than I should have as a kid, and still think they are great examples of a new twist on traditional supernatural instances. In these books, the alleged vampire is a bunny. Told from the point of view of the family dog, they employ many traditional vampire legends combined to create a fresh, interesting "chapter book." First, Bunnicula sucks the juices out of vegetables, paralleling a humanoid vampire's need for blood. Check. He also has a weakness to sunlight, wooden stakes, and garlic, all criteria employed by the family cat, Chester. Triple check. Although superficial, Bunnicula's appearance also contributes to his vampirism: a white rabbit with a cape-like black marking and red eyes. Check, once again.
As a final example of a fairly strict adherence to the rules, I suggest the Dangerous Girls books by R. L. Stine. Employing a large number of my first list's guidelines in a modern setting, I found these two books to be a very enjoyable read.
Apologies for the lengthy comment, but I hope you see where I am coming from and take my points into consideration.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
simplyprose In reply to snowballchibikat [2009-12-14 08:07:31 +0000 UTC]
You oviously know a few things about this, and feel quite strongly about it too. It's amazing how many people have picked up on Twilight as suggested reading, and decided to make some sort of comment about it. Besides everything you mentioned, it's generally considered to be badly written, and personally I quite agree with that prognosis. But of course it's up to the individual reader to make a judgement on any book in the reading list (it is implied, I hope, that they will are advised the more meritable books I mention as well if they do choose to read Twilight), and to make their own judgements on how to use the advice given in this article.
Thank you for your comments. I hope that the guide comes across as fairly impartial, but strong and unashamedly biased reader opinions have their place as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HiddenRelevance [2009-05-27 18:40:21 +0000 UTC]
*applauds* Incredibly concise and well written my dear. Great job!
And on a side note just cuz I see so many people arguing against it: Twilight really is MARKET research for any young adult writer. While yes, as a 24 year old, I find it rather obnoxious, if you go into a high school, those kids are acting JUST like Bella & crew. There is no way around it: Stephanie Myer nailed her audience, and that is what a good writer needs to realize how to do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
simplyprose In reply to HiddenRelevance [2009-05-28 10:19:58 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. Of course, you are right about Twilight. It is very strange the way I have to defend my decision to include it - it is all explained within the guide.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HiddenRelevance In reply to simplyprose [2009-05-28 14:47:03 +0000 UTC]
I know- I suppose they just started skimming as soon as they saw the title lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
StaticFactory [2009-05-25 02:30:44 +0000 UTC]
It's a very nice guide
One small complaint tho: Why is Twilight on the list? Point number two is "do your research", and last I checked, most vamps don't do sunlight. (They certainly don't sparkle. )
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
RA-Meenan In reply to StaticFactory [2010-08-21 07:04:03 +0000 UTC]
Actually, the original vampire, Dracula, walked around in sunlight quite a lot. It wasn't actually until an unlicensed movie of Dracula, called Nosferatu came out and sunlight is what killed the vampire. Try reading Bram Stoker's book. There's quite a lot about vampires originally that just isn't true anymore! XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MagpieVon In reply to StaticFactory [2010-08-20 15:27:36 +0000 UTC]
Vampires don't do sunlight unless the creator of the particular work gives them reason to. It all goes back to what's in the guide here. You can tweek legends and myths, but it needs to stay clear and believable for your reader. Twilight doesn't do this, of course. It's simply, "OMG HE SPARKLES! *stupid fangirl squee*" and that's the end of that. There are much better stories out there, even within the deviantART community, that do great jobs of having Vampires as daywalkers that DON'T sparkle, and yet is also very believable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
simplyprose In reply to StaticFactory [2009-05-25 10:35:18 +0000 UTC]
Well thank you.
It is explained why Twilight is on the list. No book on that list is suggested reading material in terms of researching your creature. The list is there because the most important thing a writer needs to do is research the market.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StaticFactory In reply to simplyprose [2009-05-25 15:22:13 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I see. Sorry for the mix-up
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ArchArad [2009-05-05 21:01:12 +0000 UTC]
A very well thought out and presented guide. Thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kikimaymay [2009-03-30 05:44:19 +0000 UTC]
You should add the Dresden Files to your recommended reading list. Jim Butcher does an amazing job with everything you mentioned.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
simplyprose In reply to Kikimaymay [2009-03-30 09:15:03 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for the recommendation - I'll have to look into that, if I get the chance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Orestiad [2009-02-20 14:12:00 +0000 UTC]
This is a very helpful guide for paranormal writing which I have some experience in and I agree with the points raised.
To mirror *Memnalar 's point the adult market for Paranormal Romance is actually quite large. I can reel off a list of authors that tend to write in this genre, Laurell K Hamilton, Kelley Armstrong, Sherrilyn Kenyon, Kim Harrison and Jim Butcher are but a few.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
simplyprose In reply to Orestiad [2009-02-20 21:26:25 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for your comments, and the information.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>