HOME | DD

sky004 In reply to ??? [2010-11-28 18:30:15 +0000 UTC]

Aha.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Avile13 In reply to sky004 [2010-11-28 20:02:12 +0000 UTC]

..więc komentuję po polsku

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to Avile13 [2010-11-28 20:19:26 +0000 UTC]

No, to dobrze.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sky004 In reply to xXivZ [2010-11-28 19:31:37 +0000 UTC]

Thank You!
I'm very excited about that DD.
I never thought I'd get one!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

photographybyfallon In reply to ??? [2010-11-28 16:29:37 +0000 UTC]

A well deserved DD, this is so beautiful. I love how the colours blend in together and I love the bokeh. This is completely perfect. Congrats

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to photographybyfallon [2010-11-28 19:32:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much for the kind words.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

photographybyfallon In reply to sky004 [2010-11-28 20:12:58 +0000 UTC]

np!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RaBBiTKa In reply to ??? [2010-11-28 13:59:06 +0000 UTC]

Świetne! gratulacje!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to RaBBiTKa [2010-11-28 15:21:13 +0000 UTC]

Dziękuję!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BonzzGX In reply to ??? [2010-11-28 13:38:26 +0000 UTC]

quite breathtaking capture(at least for me)! -the colors & lighting are just beautiful & strokes u a bit with a profound meaning, but supposedly a bit different for each of us!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Szczur88 In reply to ??? [2010-11-28 12:45:24 +0000 UTC]

Pancolara 50/1,8 spróbuj... ze 2 stówki to kosztuje, więc bez tragedii, a o niebo lepsze od Heliosa.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to Szczur88 [2010-11-28 12:57:24 +0000 UTC]

W tym przediale cenowym już mam 50-tkę Canona i całkowicie spełnia moje oczekiwania.
Heliosa używam tylko jako ciekawostkę i gdy mam jakieś makro do zrobienia, bo do m42 mam pierścienie pośrednie. Nie wątpię, że Pancolar jest lepszy, kosztuje w końcu prawie 10 razy więcej od tego Heliosa.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Szczur88 In reply to sky004 [2010-11-28 13:55:53 +0000 UTC]

Pancolar jest sporo lepszy od 50/1,8 II Canona A do macro nie za krótki?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to Szczur88 [2010-11-28 15:09:28 +0000 UTC]

na APS-C daje ~85mm. Przy pierścieniach makro daje potężne powiększenie, do celu można podejść na kilka centymetrów.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Szczur88 In reply to sky004 [2010-11-28 15:13:16 +0000 UTC]

no o to właśnie chodzi, jakieś 135 daje to samo powiększenie z pierścieniami, a możesz być od obiektu dalej, wygodniej się pracuje.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to Szczur88 [2010-11-28 15:24:09 +0000 UTC]

Mam 135 i porównywałem, Helios daje mi mimo wszystko zauważalnie większe powiększenie.
Plus nie zawsze mam możliwość używania statywu, dlatego wolę latać z czymś, co tak nie trzęsie kadrem jak teleobiektywy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bypass2020 In reply to ??? [2010-11-28 12:34:21 +0000 UTC]

Very good. I dearly miss my small Canon and it's accommodation of adapters for legacy lenses. The Helios is a fantastic lens - also consider a Planar 1.7 if you can find one cheaply. Nicely done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to bypass2020 [2010-11-28 15:20:41 +0000 UTC]

I'll look around. Thanks for the recommendation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bypass2020 In reply to sky004 [2010-11-29 00:20:55 +0000 UTC]

You'll need the Contax / Yashica adapter for that too, but well worth it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RiCavalian In reply to ??? [2010-11-28 11:34:13 +0000 UTC]

nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cocooue In reply to ??? [2010-11-28 09:08:18 +0000 UTC]

love the colors

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

llub3r In reply to ??? [2010-11-28 08:47:17 +0000 UTC]

Great shot, I love the colours and sharpness.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to llub3r [2010-11-28 10:14:41 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sky004 In reply to Photogrartist [2010-11-28 10:14:30 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you do.
Film simulation is a photoshop action.
It's from a plugin called "Exposure 2"
[link]
I totally recommend all of their plugins

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Photogrartist In reply to sky004 [2010-11-28 10:30:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the info, much appreciated

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kath660 In reply to ??? [2010-11-27 23:07:51 +0000 UTC]

epic awesome xD my camera could never focus like that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to kath660 [2010-11-27 23:46:05 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mechanical2127 In reply to ??? [2010-11-18 16:54:53 +0000 UTC]

lovely shot~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to Mechanical2127 [2010-11-18 20:52:16 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Isis-Artaud In reply to ??? [2010-11-16 15:26:12 +0000 UTC]

that's great

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sky004 In reply to Isis-Artaud [2010-11-16 18:27:03 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0