HOME | DD

sragetsFractal Periodic Table

#abstract #chemical #chemistry #class #classroom #compilation #design #element #explore #fractal #knowledge #learn #math #nerd #original #periodic #representation #science #scientific #table
Published: 2008-09-11 01:10:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 43007; Favourites: 813; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 449

sragets In reply to ??? [2010-12-23 12:56:28 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad it didn't lock your fingers up too!
Thanks for the comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

frodo-echostar In reply to sragets [2010-12-25 22:51:04 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome X3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

silencefreedom In reply to ??? [2010-10-22 02:07:46 +0000 UTC]

WoW!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to silencefreedom [2010-10-22 16:48:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Yaper1 In reply to ??? [2010-10-01 19:09:55 +0000 UTC]

OMG its so awesome! i am sooo gonna print this and hang it up in my room. I am a huge fan of your work, i hope you keep up the total epicness of it all

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to Yaper1 [2010-10-04 11:36:16 +0000 UTC]

I'm very glad you've been enjoying it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PurpleAusCat In reply to ??? [2010-08-21 08:38:13 +0000 UTC]

A fantastic achievement; brilliant in its conception and execution.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to PurpleAusCat [2010-08-23 02:58:47 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mental2500 [2010-08-18 02:45:29 +0000 UTC]

I bow down to your greatness

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to mental2500 [2010-08-18 11:39:46 +0000 UTC]

No need for that. I'm glad you enjoy the table.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

A-Bad-Artist [2010-06-25 13:40:10 +0000 UTC]

You've outnerded me.

I now feel inadequate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to A-Bad-Artist [2010-06-25 22:53:50 +0000 UTC]


👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tibodo [2010-05-29 14:47:33 +0000 UTC]

What a most brilliant idea, and such a masterful realization!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to Tibodo [2010-05-30 02:49:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Circlejourney In reply to ??? [2010-04-23 15:11:03 +0000 UTC]

Amazing, really amazing! I'm so glad you completed it--you didn't leave out a single element, which makes me very happy because my favourite elements are the kind that always get overlooked

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to Circlejourney [2010-04-23 16:00:59 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!
Glad you're enjoying it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Leanndra51 In reply to ??? [2010-04-19 02:57:27 +0000 UTC]

If this had been hanging on the wall when I took chemistry in college, I would have found learning the table much more interesting, and beautiful.
Hmm, there's a thought huh?


Your creativity, the amount of time it had to take to render these individual images, and then to stitch them together, especially at the size you did, indicates a hi level of commitment. This is such a creative, and well realized idea. Congratulations on the DD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to Leanndra51 [2010-04-19 11:43:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much for your kind words. I worked on this while I was studying chemistry myself in college...so yeah, it helped tons! More than you would even believe!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Leanndra51 In reply to sragets [2010-05-29 13:39:24 +0000 UTC]

It is truly an amazing group of flames, most unusual art, and I sincerely think it would be a great learning tool. I believe it would make learning the table easier to remember because of the association between the elements and the flames. Much more interesting.

And, you are very welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hop41 [2010-01-21 16:11:36 +0000 UTC]

Nice!
I know Carbon has 4 electrons in the outer shell and wants 4. In your carbon fractal each dot has 4 line segments emanating. Nitrogen has 5 and wants 3. The nitrogen has three line segments emanating from the center. Or is that just coincidence?

Is each fractal design some how connected with the element it represents?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to Hop41 [2010-01-22 16:47:00 +0000 UTC]

Yes, this was done on purpose. I very carefully researched each of the elements before and during their design to try to represent them as accurately as possible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LilMyssSandoval [2010-01-07 00:38:09 +0000 UTC]

This is amazing ^o^ haha totally unexpected too! I was just doing my homework when i came across this! Woke me up

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to LilMyssSandoval [2010-01-07 03:28:58 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sophonax-Skitty [2010-01-04 20:29:21 +0000 UTC]

Wow... So many pretty fractals... This is so darn brilliant that a single word has yet to be invented to describe just how brilliant it is. Love it! *instafave*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to Sophonax-Skitty [2010-01-04 20:54:41 +0000 UTC]



I'm very glad you like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sophonax-Skitty In reply to sragets [2010-01-04 20:55:27 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mario837 In reply to ??? [2009-12-27 01:35:09 +0000 UTC]

Congratulations
This is really a masterpiece

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to mario837 [2009-12-27 03:15:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alice-liz In reply to ??? [2009-12-27 00:04:03 +0000 UTC]

OMG!
It's perfect! I love it!

This periodic table is amazing!
*-*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to alice-liz [2009-12-27 03:15:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alice-liz In reply to sragets [2009-12-28 10:20:06 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

araguepli2 [2009-12-19 13:04:25 +0000 UTC]

perfect.. i love it!!!!

Fav's for you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to araguepli2 [2009-12-19 15:43:55 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

skyzyk In reply to ??? [2009-12-11 17:22:36 +0000 UTC]

What a great idea and an even better job. I am curious, is there any relation between the elements and the chosen fractals for each of them? Congrats

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to skyzyk [2009-12-12 15:19:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much! I really enjoyed making this.
To answer your question, yes. I spent quite a lot of time researching each individual element trying to best represent them in fractal form. For instance: Krypton. It is known to have green and orange spectral lines. I tried to replicate that as close as possible. For copper, most people picture the metal color, but I went with the aqueous solution color because for chemist and those in chemistry classes, it would be much more recognizable and memorable.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

skyzyk In reply to sragets [2009-12-12 22:04:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the reply. Now I can see why it took so long to compile. Bravo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CodytheMaster In reply to ??? [2009-11-17 03:03:46 +0000 UTC]

This is just amazing, in every sense of the word. Absolutely stunning. Excellent work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to CodytheMaster [2009-11-17 12:11:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! It was quite enjoyable to make.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CodytheMaster In reply to sragets [2009-11-18 00:01:51 +0000 UTC]

I bet it was! o:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Drag-on2 [2009-11-03 11:46:08 +0000 UTC]

tremendous

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to Drag-on2 [2009-11-03 13:13:36 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

milleniumsentry [2009-10-19 03:05:49 +0000 UTC]

I thought I already had this in my favorites. This is one of my favorite fractals on DA.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to milleniumsentry [2009-10-19 11:26:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much! I'm really glad you like it.
Lots of time and research went into putting it all together.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

milleniumsentry In reply to sragets [2009-10-19 19:01:15 +0000 UTC]

It really is excellent. I wanted to do something similar with my piece Nucleus, [link] using the valence electron levels as the determining number for the julia xform.. but I hit far to many roadblocks. Unfortunately, I was still far to experienced in Apo for the concept to be met by my skillset.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to milleniumsentry [2009-10-19 19:52:31 +0000 UTC]

Think you could give it another shot now?
What kind of roadblocks did you run into?

I was thinking you could flatten the julia xforms in the way that the "wire" / "tube" julia's are made, and if you use the julia power variable you can control how many "electrons" are in each level.
And just as an aside, I'm a huge fan of your work! I love the colors and the flow of the fractals, and have a ton of your wallpapers constantly switching on my desktop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

milleniumsentry In reply to sragets [2009-10-20 00:51:05 +0000 UTC]

If I remember correctly, the initial setup is lost fairly quickly, so it was difficult to even change a small amount of params to get what I was after.. at least, while maintaining the original look of the flame. I think it would be possible with a different setup though. It would probably just end up looking fairly different than the original.

And thanks.. I have always loved fractals, so it's my pleasure to share them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kendra21 In reply to ??? [2009-06-23 23:06:33 +0000 UTC]

Now this is different. I just love this concept, and you've achieved it so superbly. I can only imagine the work and time you put into this, it really paid off.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sragets In reply to Kendra21 [2009-06-25 02:18:29 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for your kind words. I'm very glad you're enjoying it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

vladcarrion In reply to ??? [2009-03-16 03:17:15 +0000 UTC]

This is sweet

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

firelord65 [2009-02-15 23:53:56 +0000 UTC]

This is really amazing! The amount of effort and time this must have taken is absolutely breathtaking.
How exactly did you come up with what each should look like? I mean, are they based on their composition, or their traits?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>