HOME | DD

Published: 2008-02-16 08:17:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 1923; Favourites: 158; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I backed off the colors bit. Sorry for any retinal burning I may have unintentionally caused.Related content
Comments: 88
roovel [2008-02-16 12:23:31 +0000 UTC]
pretty nice.. but still you've some areas with high saturation, am sure it's a bit obvious , dunno if its voluntary. anyhow, the treatment in general is very good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Toadsmoothy2 In reply to roovel [2008-02-16 14:16:53 +0000 UTC]
Yeah...I could back it off a bit
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AnaViegas In reply to ??? [2008-02-16 10:05:33 +0000 UTC]
And in autumn is a paradise also
Love the bright and warm colours
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
artstarter In reply to ??? [2008-02-16 10:00:47 +0000 UTC]
The canvas effect is great in this one...very clever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Toadsmoothy2 In reply to 4everchild [2008-02-16 14:24:46 +0000 UTC]
aww What a lovely comment! Thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
coshipi [2008-02-16 08:20:56 +0000 UTC]
I remember trying to do "photomanips" like this in the days before personal computers, by projecting a slide slightly out of focus onto a piece of canvas art board, and photographing the projection. It didn't work very well, and of course you didn't know whether it had worked or not until you got the film developed, and each attempt cost another bit of film...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Toadsmoothy2 In reply to coshipi [2008-02-16 08:22:46 +0000 UTC]
haha Yeah, that hadda suck! But, if you developed your own film you could have projected both slides superimposed and developed that
Of course, with computors and digital images its about 5 minutes work and no expense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
coshipi In reply to Toadsmoothy2 [2008-02-16 08:31:07 +0000 UTC]
I did sometimes develop my own film - we had a pretty good darkroom at the college where I was lecturing in those days. But it's a lot of hassle if you're trying to do a decent job of each one, especially if you're doing cunning things like unsharp masking or manual dodging. I gave up after a term when I took a group of teenagers for an extracurricular course in photography - got completely fed up with it. The kids had a wild time - they used to hail me in the street for years afterwards.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Toadsmoothy2 In reply to coshipi [2008-02-16 14:26:47 +0000 UTC]
Well, thats the big debate between film and digital. I'm sure you can achieve certain finishes with film you simply can't digitally, but by in large, I don't feel its worth my time, effort and money.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
coshipi In reply to Toadsmoothy2 [2008-02-16 15:08:39 +0000 UTC]
I think most of the techniques I used in the darkroom, or was aware of anyone else using, have been emulated in software now. The emulation sometimes isn't all that good, at least, not in the software packages I've used - but generally the digital options are easier to use, quicker and cheaper - and much more flexible. I wouldn't consider going back to film now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Toadsmoothy2 In reply to coshipi [2008-02-17 08:11:44 +0000 UTC]
I think a lot of it has to do with the quality of the print too. I will say that the printing house dA uses is top notch. Their Lustre prints of faux darkroom images are rather impressive. I was lucky that Anne (Limaria) bought several for me to sign while she was here. So, I had the opportunity to examine them closely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0