HOME | DD

UffeJakobsen β€” 'Attention, Please' no. 2 [NSFW]

Published: 2010-08-03 17:42:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 41512; Favourites: 814; Downloads: 836
Redirect to original
Description Model: Anonymous + Uffe Jakobsen (behind the paper)
Photography and editing: Uffe Jakobsen
Related content
Comments: 555

RoseByte In reply to ??? [2010-10-14 19:57:51 +0000 UTC]

well at least you seem like a pretty reasonable person

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

anne-demonangel In reply to RoseByte [2010-10-15 08:45:39 +0000 UTC]

i tend to be obssessed to being a peace maker sometimes
i just dislike argues

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RoseByte In reply to anne-demonangel [2010-10-15 14:29:17 +0000 UTC]

i know what you mean but that's not a bad thing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

viisi In reply to ??? [2010-10-12 02:31:06 +0000 UTC]

i say eww and I have a creative mind, after all I have won awards for it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RoseByte In reply to viisi [2010-10-12 03:28:34 +0000 UTC]

Awards do not mean a squat, some of the most important people in this country are total idiots who can't see past their noses so spare me the award talk please.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

viisi In reply to RoseByte [2010-10-12 03:30:16 +0000 UTC]

oh please XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RoseByte In reply to viisi [2010-10-12 03:32:55 +0000 UTC]

I would love to sit here and argue why the word "eww" would come out of someone's mind when looking at something like this is totally inmature but to be honest i tend to get bored very quickly at how simple minded most humans are which is why i won't persue this... it got old.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

viisi In reply to RoseByte [2010-10-12 03:33:53 +0000 UTC]

Ok so stop writing paragraphs to me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RoseByte In reply to viisi [2010-10-12 03:35:00 +0000 UTC]

Why don't you stop writing to me first, spoke in general yet you took it upon yourself to bother me with your nonsense please leave me alone and find something to do.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

viisi In reply to RoseByte [2010-10-12 03:39:21 +0000 UTC]

Wait weren't you boring yourself? Don't reply if you are bored try try try I know you can't resist the temptation because you are fighting so hard to find something to get me with. Keep going you are almost there oh wait no you lost it. Remember don't reply to this, don't give into your anger. Quit while you are behind babe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

MikaTanaka In reply to viisi [2010-10-12 05:58:46 +0000 UTC]

Bragging about your awards just highlights how immature you really are. Look past whether or not you think the model is attractive and look at the picture as a whole and the emotions that are so readily apparent in it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

viisi In reply to MikaTanaka [2010-10-12 07:02:21 +0000 UTC]

oh bragging? you need a dictionary.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MikaTanaka In reply to viisi [2010-10-12 12:42:55 +0000 UTC]

Sorry about my spelling, I probably should have been more careful. However, my point still stands.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RoseByte In reply to viisi [2010-10-12 03:39:55 +0000 UTC]

you're so cute

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

viisi In reply to RoseByte [2010-10-12 03:43:36 +0000 UTC]

I hope you weren't looking in the mirror sexy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RoseByte In reply to viisi [2010-10-12 03:45:13 +0000 UTC]

*sighs*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

viisi In reply to RoseByte [2010-10-12 03:45:36 +0000 UTC]

aww sorry, I didn't realise you weren't

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BlackWings86 In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 23:34:14 +0000 UTC]

Exactly. People come in various shapes, sizes and colors, and all of them beautiful creations. Obviously it sparked your interest and curiosity if you bothered to even click on the thumbnail. If you have a problem with someone's appearance then why are you even looking at the image?

I support

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

RoseByte In reply to BlackWings86 [2010-10-12 03:28:46 +0000 UTC]

totally agree

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

viisi In reply to BlackWings86 [2010-10-12 02:31:34 +0000 UTC]

to ask what the hell is going on in the DD choice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MikaTanaka In reply to viisi [2010-10-12 06:00:01 +0000 UTC]

So only pictures who feature models you find attractive are worthy of a DD? Really?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

viisi In reply to MikaTanaka [2010-10-12 07:01:20 +0000 UTC]

Daily Deviation or Daily Scare. you choose your answer

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MikaTanaka In reply to viisi [2010-10-12 12:48:17 +0000 UTC]

Daily Deviation...
Are you being deliberately obtuse?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jinggo78 In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 23:02:50 +0000 UTC]

Anonymous is a lovely model. I'd like to see more. And I agree that this is a great concept. Very effective photography.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Princess-Marly [2010-10-11 22:59:42 +0000 UTC]

This is lovely.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

littlexmace In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:54:01 +0000 UTC]

There's lot's of interesting angels, and to play devil's advocate:

Perhaps the woman is fighting obesity, or maybe not even fighting and just let herself go. I feel both partners should both equally strive to be fit for one another. I've nothing against big girls, but there's big and there's unhealthy. I disagree with the medical baseline for 'obesity' [thanks Calista Flockheart] but that isn't to say there's no such thing. It's a real concern more people need to be aware of. It's not just bad for your health, but it could be bad for your relationship if you're not caring for yourself.

P.S. This excludes medical issues like hyperthyroid disorders. I'm talking about people who just decide to stop working out or just don't care when their youthful metabolism shuts down. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and this is mine :]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Exillior In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:53:22 +0000 UTC]

I keep looking at this wonderful photo again and again. And I keep thinking... "If looks could kill... or at least roast..."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SylviaDraw In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:46:09 +0000 UTC]

love when stereotypes are made fun off! this is amazing! sheΒ΄s too young and pretty for the classic combination , but thats what gives it more sexual tension. him I imagine ugly, extremely thin and bald. of the 2 pics of the series, this one i like better because it looks like the fat cat is about to lose her temper and start pawing her little mouse man!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hole-in-my-head In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:45:18 +0000 UTC]

A woman of curves like her shoudn't be ignored! She's very beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LightingReptile In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:34:35 +0000 UTC]

oh WWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"ROFL"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thebacongirl In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:26:27 +0000 UTC]

in regards to the people saying she looks out of proportion? not everyone has proportionate body parts... not everyone is symmetrical, etc etc.

as to the entire photo? love it, the meanings, hidden and obvious (and personally i'm one of those people who usually miss everything that isn't obvious, ha ha, so there's probably more here that i haven't considered yet), and i think one thing that got me is the angle of the man's legs... other than the way he's holding the paper, somehow the way his legs are, the angle of his feet, even, seem to emphasize the sheepish "i'm pretending to read but i'm actually ignoring you" attitude.

or maybe he's afraid... because while she's a big lady, he looks to be on the thin side. he might be worried she'd snap him in half with those legs

either way congrats on the DD, well deserved!

ps: to those who click 'add comment' only to type in 'ewww'? grow up. if you don't like something about a photo, be it ANY aspect, and you feel you have to comment, at least try to say something constructive. otherwise.. stfu.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Onnep-ink In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:24:26 +0000 UTC]

Well posed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RemedyForYourDisease In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:15:23 +0000 UTC]

Ha, I love this! The woman's expression is priceless, sort of a "Well? Are you going to pay attention to me NOW?"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RicardoMeireles In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:14:09 +0000 UTC]

cool work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

benreason In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:11:40 +0000 UTC]

nice concept!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

K-kare In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 22:04:21 +0000 UTC]

I dont blame him.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

viisi In reply to K-kare [2010-10-12 02:32:46 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pandamanta In reply to K-kare [2010-10-11 23:24:46 +0000 UTC]

You double posted dorkfag

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K-kare In reply to pandamanta [2010-10-12 00:41:01 +0000 UTC]

Because of INTERNAL SERVER ERROR YOU idiot f*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pandamanta In reply to K-kare [2010-10-12 23:50:18 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K-kare In reply to pandamanta [2010-10-13 22:03:18 +0000 UTC]

I care what you say.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pandamanta In reply to K-kare [2010-10-15 00:20:02 +0000 UTC]

Oh how wonderful! Another sarcastic bastard!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K-kare In reply to pandamanta [2010-10-15 01:54:52 +0000 UTC]

yeah right... i guess your mom had a internal server error while you were coming out..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pandamanta In reply to K-kare [2010-10-15 03:33:53 +0000 UTC]

error 404: Intelligence not found.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K-kare In reply to pandamanta [2010-10-15 21:04:55 +0000 UTC]

I know its kinda hard for you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pandamanta In reply to K-kare [2010-10-16 00:33:05 +0000 UTC]

That's what she said bitch

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K-kare In reply to pandamanta [2010-10-16 17:43:50 +0000 UTC]

i knew that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pandamanta In reply to K-kare [2010-10-17 04:45:02 +0000 UTC]

No. No you didn't. In reality I knocked you into a coma and hooked your brain up to a mind-altering program that I have modified to make every reply of yours to one of my comments an immediate fail. Your argument is invalid. Good day.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K-kare In reply to pandamanta [2010-10-17 22:44:19 +0000 UTC]

Kid.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pandamanta In reply to K-kare [2010-10-18 23:31:15 +0000 UTC]

See? Just like I said.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>