HOME | DD

Published: 2010-02-17 18:23:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 34611; Favourites: 705; Downloads: 606
Redirect to original
Description
:thumb105504303:
Character sheet for my 'teryx character, Morena. Funny that I'm finishing this one now since I'm also working on a character sheet for ~ArchTeryx 's Archaeopteryx character as wall.
Edit: Wow. I wasn't expecting a DD for this... since it's just a character sheet and I feel like I have a lot of better things in my MAIN gallery... but the powers that be seem to think otherwise. While I REALLY appreciate my first DD, I wish it would have been for something else.
And... since some people seem to be being VERY rude about this, comments are now disabled. Trolls belong under bridges... not on my dA page.
Seriously, people. Where did you learn your manners? I mean really... being an unholy asshole over a tiny image at the bottom of a webpage that will go away in 24 hours. Sure says a lot about you guys.
Pose referenced from one of *frisket17 's paper dolls - (She's cool with it!
Asian texture by ~exotik-stokk
All other textures from CGtextures.com
Character & Image Β© 2010 Traci Vermeesch-Vezina
Please DO NOT copy, alter, repost, etc without the consent of the artist! Character/Image are NOT public domain!
Related content
Comments: 205
SleetFury In reply to ??? [2010-03-04 19:54:55 +0000 UTC]
Naahh, last time I did I reduced him to tears.
π: 0 β©: 0
jragin In reply to ??? [2010-03-04 18:43:14 +0000 UTC]
Bud Light Presents: Real Men of Genius
(real men of genius!)
Today we salute you, Mr. Daliy Deviation Rejector Guy.
(Mr. Daily Deviation Rejector Guy!)
One hundred people loved this artist and their work, but what do they know?
(wake up, sheeple!)
Anyone can lend their public support, but your faceless thumbs-down will be heard around the world.
(anonymity is my friend!)
For you, it's not about the content or the cause, it's about the DDs you've never received on your erotic furry fiction.
(just don't understand me!)
Yours is a lone voice now, but soon the faceless masses will pour in to reject this artist along with you, just as soon as you can make the alternate accounts.
(my personal army!)
So crack open an ice-cold Bud Light, ninja of negation, because no party is complete without a wet blanket.
(Mr. Daily Deviation Rejector Guy!)
....... Okay i may have ripped off this person's work here in the most horrible way [link] But i always wanted to see a response to it by an actual.....whatever you are
(seriously, you rock!)
π: 0 β©: 1
kaikikuro In reply to ??? [2010-03-04 16:49:55 +0000 UTC]
This character sheet wouldn't make a bad DD. Among many others out there. :]
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to kaikikuro [2010-03-04 17:01:21 +0000 UTC]
You don't understand or don't want to understand. Some cathegories should be simply banned from DD competition. Character sheets are one of them
π: 0 β©: 1
kaikikuro In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 17:20:38 +0000 UTC]
Why character sheets entirely though? Based off of what you said and are implying. DD's are awarded to hard work and attention to detail. If a character sheet doesn't do that then it's missing the point.
Designing unique characters isn't as easy as it seems, and is therefore an art in itself. It can take months and in some cases, years to get something that works and it could still turn out to be subpar.
I'm not missing your point, I see it entirely, I just don't agree with it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to kaikikuro [2010-03-04 17:31:04 +0000 UTC]
You can make a pic of character WITHOUT character sheet. That's all about character sheets. It's not rpg session.
π: 0 β©: 1
kaikikuro In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 17:45:41 +0000 UTC]
Sure you can.
But that doesn't mean the character design sheet is less meaningful since you still have to show personality, design, and physical personality. That's the skeleton that creates the finale design. And based off of that, in certain cases, could be considered just as, if not more, important than the character just standing in a white background or looking like a screenshot from a film.
I just think that both are equal forms of art. And both can be just as bad as the other if done improperly.
Yea... most sheets here on DA are for rpging it seems. And sure, [link] >these pieces due make hella' good DD's, but if the character sheet is just as interesting, full of life and consideration, even dynamic action! Couldn't that be DD worthy?
π: 0 β©: 3
WhiteRaven90 In reply to kaikikuro [2010-03-04 18:35:28 +0000 UTC]
Leave it, he's just jealous. And has a lot to learn. ;<
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to WhiteRaven90 [2010-03-04 19:07:39 +0000 UTC]
Jealous about what? Crating crappy art?
π: 0 β©: 0
Myrth1 In reply to kaikikuro [2010-03-04 18:31:48 +0000 UTC]
So it's art or still rpg character? For me those two don't mix together. At all. Because you either draw/paint character or describe him/her/it.
But that piece you gave - it's not a character sheet... isn't it? Plus if face expressions were a bit more detailed, it would be really great piece
π: 0 β©: 1
kaikikuro In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 19:50:19 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, kind of depends I guess, that is a rather grey area which is good to bring up. Can't really refute your point on that quite yet as I'm not sure yet myself, lol.
Well, it is a character sheet, not for an rpg - but for a comic I think. The artist his more info somewhere in her gallery.
π: 0 β©: 0
Eggplantm [2010-03-04 15:19:03 +0000 UTC]
I'm glad to see you got the DD for this. I really thought it was different and special and I could see a lot of work went into it.
However, I do apologize for all the negative comments from one or two people who seem to have a very narrow idea of what qualifies as a daily deviation. I nominated it because the anthro concept was unique and beautiful and I could see a lot of artistic decisions and work went into making this reference page a visually pleasing work of art.
I'm biting my tongue to keep from responding to some of the rather unfair comments you have gotten since this became a DD. I really don't think it will do any good talking to them and probably start a comment flame war which I really have no interest in. So, if any of their comments hurt your feelings, I'm sorry. I suggested it as a DD and I still think it is worthy of being one and I applaud the new anthro moderator for selecting something different instead of the myriad of usual DD anthro choices that all look like they were done by the exact same group of three people.
Again, congratulations and I'm sorry.
π: 0 β©: 0
Mack3r3l In reply to ??? [2010-03-04 14:38:25 +0000 UTC]
...I don't approve of this Daily Deviation.
π: 0 β©: 2
CrAZy-OvER-AnImE In reply to Mack3r3l [2010-03-04 20:08:14 +0000 UTC]
Get a life. The artist did not choose this deviation to be a DD.
It was chosen not for skill, but for creativity
π: 0 β©: 0
SailorKnightWing In reply to Mack3r3l [2010-03-04 15:47:18 +0000 UTC]
FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature?
π: 0 β©: 1
Ashkihyena In reply to SailorKnightWing [2010-03-04 19:59:26 +0000 UTC]
It's sad that people don't seem to follow that rule.
π: 0 β©: 0
CrAZy-OvER-AnImE In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 20:09:22 +0000 UTC]
If you have a problem with it, the artist does not need to know. So next time, don't leave a comment.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to CrAZy-OvER-AnImE [2010-03-04 20:11:30 +0000 UTC]
Why doesn't need? Because it's rude? Or inappropriate?
Read all the comments. Then think if you really have to repeat what people have said few times...
π: 0 β©: 0
InvisibleQuail In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 18:48:17 +0000 UTC]
Agree. But that's how DA is, lol.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to InvisibleQuail [2010-03-04 18:54:41 +0000 UTC]
That doesn't mean I or you or anyone else have to live with it
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to MissPinks [2010-03-04 14:32:10 +0000 UTC]
[link]
This is what DD should be - hard work, extremly detailed and original (who the hell have enough patience to BURN such masterpiece ). But well... maybe we all should gain befriended moderators
π: 0 β©: 3
kastrerad In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 15:38:35 +0000 UTC]
Agreed fully. |: I thought perhaps this would be special in /some/ way but it's...not.
π: 0 β©: 2
kaikikuro In reply to kastrerad [2010-03-04 17:02:32 +0000 UTC]
Normally I judge a DD based on either technical ability, or concept and composition.
At least this has... composition? Lol. Maybe concept, idk tbh.
π: 0 β©: 1
kastrerad In reply to kaikikuro [2010-03-04 17:11:12 +0000 UTC]
There's nothing wrong with the picture it's just that it's not a DD in my eyes. o_O And further more it's a scrap. The artist has so many more better pictures in her actual gallery, why choose this?
π: 0 β©: 0
SailorKnightWing In reply to kastrerad [2010-03-04 15:47:31 +0000 UTC]
FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature?
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to SailorKnightWing [2010-03-04 16:41:03 +0000 UTC]
Oh, how our argument is strong an manly...
π: 0 β©: 1
SailorKnightWing In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 17:15:39 +0000 UTC]
I'd certainly hope not, seeing as I'm a woman. But regardless. Look. Your behavior was wrong. The FAQ says so. You obviously hadn't read that, because you wouldn't have done it if you had. You don't have to like the Deviation. But you're also not supposed to bring it up on the Deviation itself. It's rude, it's immature, it's against the rules. You have a problem, take it up with the admin who featured it. Simple.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to SailorKnightWing [2010-03-04 17:29:24 +0000 UTC]
I did it when first time I was scolded for bad behaviour on dA. That was about two years ago.
That makes it my own problem that I'm rude, inmature and like always breaking the rules. Why should I even bother talking with moderator, if they IGNORE you every time you when you ask them why this or that get DD? They don't give a damn about me, I don't give a damn about them. That's all
π: 0 β©: 1
SailorKnightWing In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 17:46:27 +0000 UTC]
Not an excuse. You don't like a law, that doesn't give you the right to break it. I'm sorry if they don't respond to you. That's something you have to deal with, not take out on others.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to SailorKnightWing [2010-03-04 17:54:11 +0000 UTC]
Tell me about it...
π: 0 β©: 0
Alikurai In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 15:10:05 +0000 UTC]
My God, is that even possible....I'd love to see that piece IRL, it's incredible! Also, this thing getting a DD is mockery to true art... Sadly it happens a lot.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to Alikurai [2010-03-04 15:26:50 +0000 UTC]
It's not mockery of art. It's antro, dude. It's mockery of everything...
Scrap getting DD. I could understand that if it was some masterpiece sketch for example. But THIS?!
π: 0 β©: 2
kaikikuro In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 16:36:22 +0000 UTC]
If an antho piece is just as well executed as anything else seen on DA then it deserves to have a DD.
Does this specific piece deserve it? Maybe not, but to diss all anthro art based off of this or any other is a bit biased and closeminded.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to kaikikuro [2010-03-04 16:40:02 +0000 UTC]
If this not deserve DD (your own words) then why it get one?
π: 0 β©: 1
kaikikuro In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 16:45:06 +0000 UTC]
I didn't say it didn't. I said that maybe it doesn't.
Based off of this there are other reasons why a DD is given. Just because something is done beautifully doesn't mean it's as artistic as something done with a lesser understanding of the technical aspects of art, but shows a well executed concept and has a good composition.
I also said "maybe it doesn't" based off of what you're judging it by, which is its technical aspects.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to kaikikuro [2010-03-04 16:50:54 +0000 UTC]
Let's start playing words
This is not worth DD. Get it? And this is point where I get tired to answering this avalanche of defending comments. You are all public attorneys or what?!
π: 0 β©: 1
kaikikuro In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 16:58:00 +0000 UTC]
You mentioned before that you have the right to comment whatever you want, so why should other people be prohibited from doing the same to you? I find it ironic that you can't take what you throw. :/
Yet again, you're misunderstanding me. I'm neutral on whether or not this deserves a DD. On the technical side does it deserve it? No. It has many flaws in terms of consistency, coloring, and execution.
Does it deserve it on the terms on concept? Maybe. Although I like some anthros out there, I'm not a huge fan of them overall. And in terms of furry art in general, it kind of depends on me. Concept should push further than anything else in a furry piece for me. I think in terms of it being a dino anthro is pretty cool, seeing how most anthros are mammals, and typical oens at that.
I agree that there are more deserving pieces out there for DD. But I will admit I've seen far worse DD's submitted than this one. Which is why I'm staying a bit neutral on this one.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to kaikikuro [2010-03-04 17:08:29 +0000 UTC]
Maybe if only you would pour your comments... and someone else. But I'm here and there is small army, tossing answers like mad on me
And I didn't tell also that it's worst DD-granted piece ever. It's not even 50% that bad like half of nude shots and most of fan arts. Not to mention manga/anime pieces... and crappy digital art pieces where I wonder who the hell suggested it and then "pat" as DD... But it still not good enough to get DD. Concept is not enough. There is such Polish saying: Dobrymi chΔciami jest piekΕo wybrukowane - The Hell is paved with good intentions.
π: 0 β©: 1
kaikikuro In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 17:27:51 +0000 UTC]
I wasn't trying to attack you. There are very few reasons where I'd attack someone.
You've got good points, and I do agree with some of them. On the technical side of this it's highly irksome to see such anatomical inconsistency, especially on a character sheet... augh.
I also agree there are more deserving pieces out there than this one.
It does seem that the person who featured this is friends with a mod, which does make me raise a brow. I mean, that's bound to happen regardless. I wouldn't mind it so much though if the pieces being featured by friends were outstanding examples. I honestly think this is her best piece.
π: 0 β©: 1
Myrth1 In reply to kaikikuro [2010-03-04 17:38:29 +0000 UTC]
Oww.... that's some piece! Maybe still not my DD standard, but hell better than character sheet. And would look at least more serious than that pal saying "Wow, I like this piece, so let's make it DD!". And then they say that it's me who is inmature
π: 0 β©: 0
Alikurai In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 15:39:29 +0000 UTC]
Anthro's never been my cup of tea, but lots of people like it so it HAS the right to live. But what bothers me is mostly that the artist IS talented, she has far better works than ..this, I'd be offended if I got a DD of something I put in my scraps. Not that I'm gonna get one until I become at least better than average at drawing but srsly, whoever suggested this is stupid
π: 0 β©: 2
Myrth1 In reply to Alikurai [2010-03-04 15:51:29 +0000 UTC]
He did
And he is an ass-hole, as he shown in reply to my comment
π: 0 β©: 2
Gen-Etik In reply to Myrth1 [2010-03-04 17:46:03 +0000 UTC]
Ok, we get your point. You don't like anthro art, you don't approve of DD suggestion (So he's an ass-hole ??) and you're pissed-off about the whole moderator thing...now stop it. Calling him an ass-hole is just too much...
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>