HOME | DD

Published: 2010-12-19 00:49:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 30386; Favourites: 910; Downloads: 278
Redirect to original
Description
Dress by Oh La LatexNecklace by Milkool
Related content
Comments: 125
Selene344 [2010-12-19 13:34:46 +0000 UTC]
dont agree with the name- but the pics awesome
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Matttowler In reply to USSteele [2010-12-19 16:19:45 +0000 UTC]
Look at the necklace, and for some reason this word isn't as offensive outside the US.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
formatela In reply to Matttowler [2010-12-19 20:01:59 +0000 UTC]
Actually, in the UK it's still the most offensice word there is - it's used occasionally in some TV productions but still carries a taboo that seems to no longer exist for most other sexually offensive words. The necklace and the title make this quite a thought provoking piece, quite powerful.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Matttowler In reply to formatela [2010-12-19 20:54:51 +0000 UTC]
My mistake, I've just known some UK people who have expressed surprise but it's not like they drop that word in every sentence either.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
formatela In reply to Matttowler [2010-12-21 15:26:17 +0000 UTC]
No Problem. My language is pretty raw most of the time, and I don't usually care who hears it, but there just seems to be some taboo with that word.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Dante-Dumont [2010-12-19 12:12:53 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful light, I like your pose, great job.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
OSTB [2010-12-19 11:55:42 +0000 UTC]
amazing dress and amazing pic, really kool picture
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Mitia-Arcturus [2010-12-19 10:11:03 +0000 UTC]
Hi ... ulorinvex...!!!
Your Fantastic "avant garde-fashion" Art work
Cunt
is featured in Action-Portraits...!!!
if you don't mind...
best regards.....................You're most welcome in Action-Portraits...!!!
[link]
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
geminilaser [2010-12-19 09:56:45 +0000 UTC]
what a delicious combination of orange and black
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
da07pokemon24 In reply to geminilaser [2010-12-19 15:05:21 +0000 UTC]
It's like... a tiger O.o
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
NorthernBlack In reply to ??? [2010-12-19 09:27:49 +0000 UTC]
Perfect colours, nice flow. I like it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
yugure-sayuri [2010-12-19 07:49:07 +0000 UTC]
hm. using a derogatory term in a deviation title seems...... hmm
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ulorinvex In reply to yugure-sayuri [2010-12-20 05:56:26 +0000 UTC]
its just in reference to the necklace
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
yugure-sayuri In reply to ulorinvex [2010-12-21 03:26:41 +0000 UTC]
well the word is still derogatory in itself, but whatever.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Keikuina In reply to ??? [2010-12-19 07:39:26 +0000 UTC]
Hmm... you put a mature filter on the deviation because the word is appearing in it, but you still use it as a title รฒรด?
Sorry, just think it's kinda strange oO
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ulorinvex In reply to Keikuina [2010-12-20 05:57:18 +0000 UTC]
I've no idea how the filters work, I assumed it hid the whole thing
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Suelette [2010-12-19 06:56:23 +0000 UTC]
I can see how you can use this kind of title to be brave or outstanding, but I think in future it would be considerate to refrain due to the younger people on this site.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
ulorinvex In reply to Suelette [2010-12-20 05:58:04 +0000 UTC]
I actually thought the filter hid the whole thing
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Suelette In reply to ulorinvex [2010-12-20 07:31:03 +0000 UTC]
No, it's there in pretty much full view, I wasn't trying to get up you or anything, I'm a fan of your photos, it's just that one word. I don't know why someone felt the need to fight, happy holidays.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
ninetysevenecho In reply to Suelette [2010-12-19 07:32:19 +0000 UTC]
She must've named this deviation with you in mind.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
Suelette In reply to ninetysevenecho [2010-12-19 08:20:01 +0000 UTC]
Calm down, it was a suggestion not an insult which I made clear.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ninetysevenecho In reply to Suelette [2010-12-19 18:50:17 +0000 UTC]
Calm down, it was a title not an insult which she made clear.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Suelette In reply to ninetysevenecho [2010-12-20 01:53:36 +0000 UTC]
Touche,but I still don't think it's okay for kids to see it. I'm over it, hope you are.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ninetysevenecho In reply to Suelette [2010-12-20 01:58:21 +0000 UTC]
yeah right, you're "over it". that must be why you felt the need to say it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Suelette In reply to ninetysevenecho [2010-12-20 02:00:28 +0000 UTC]
At least I didn't feel the need to be unnecessarily aggressive like you. I have no further interest in anything you have to say.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ninetysevenecho In reply to Suelette [2010-12-20 12:51:51 +0000 UTC]
no further interest? haha, lol... that must be why you keep replying.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Tuishimi In reply to Tuishimi [2010-12-19 06:20:01 +0000 UTC]
Now... your arm? Left fore arm to be specific?
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
FuzzyYak [2010-12-19 06:17:55 +0000 UTC]
The lighting in this is exquisite and the pose is awesome!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
alesiaboxing In reply to ??? [2010-12-19 02:47:31 +0000 UTC]
This looks tastier than cheesecake
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Wom-bat [2010-12-19 01:44:04 +0000 UTC]
Looks fantastic and while not my favorite word, I can't think of a tamer title that would work for this.
And yes, I saw the choker/necklace ^.^;
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ulorinvex In reply to Wom-bat [2010-12-19 01:51:23 +0000 UTC]
yeah I actually hate that word, but I was sent the jewellry to shoot
๐: 0 โฉ: 3
formatela In reply to ulorinvex [2010-12-19 20:05:53 +0000 UTC]
I think it's a great image, great title, great necklace - the title and the necklace seem to almost de-glamourise the glamour industry.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
meyow16 In reply to ulorinvex [2010-12-19 06:57:55 +0000 UTC]
if you hate the word, why would you wear it on your body?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ulorinvex In reply to meyow16 [2010-12-20 06:00:00 +0000 UTC]
I'm not that bothered, it was a job. And I thought it worked with the image
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Wom-bat In reply to ulorinvex [2010-12-19 01:56:35 +0000 UTC]
To be honest, I didn't even notice the necklace right away. I just thought the image did a great job of conveying the attitude of the title.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
llama-spit In reply to ??? [2010-12-19 01:28:05 +0000 UTC]
Love it
colours are amazing
like you kbetween skin and th dress
love the pose too
AMazingshot
love love love it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
| Next =>