HOME | DD

Published: 2009-03-06 16:15:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 96371; Favourites: 1544; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Model:rights all mine
Related content
Comments: 177
pampuka In reply to ??? [2012-01-25 20:16:52 +0000 UTC]
its still work in progress will let ya know when will be done
thx man
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WallofIllusion [2011-12-26 23:32:08 +0000 UTC]
Lovely model, and I love the contrast of the hard lines of the jumpsuit and boots vs. the soft hair.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kitsune--Kami [2011-12-26 22:17:13 +0000 UTC]
This works really very well indeed in black and white, and I love the reflections on the suit. Fantastic shot mate.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UseR2006 In reply to Extrani-Rain [2012-01-25 11:32:24 +0000 UTC]
lmao i'd love a pair just to put models in
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Extrani-Rain In reply to UseR2006 [2012-01-25 20:53:14 +0000 UTC]
Well, don't mind if I do...LOL JK. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ScarletDevil1503 [2011-12-26 21:51:41 +0000 UTC]
Congrats on the DD. Happy Holidays!
-Scarlet
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StoryKillinger [2011-12-26 21:38:57 +0000 UTC]
average latex porn shoot... Dont see the need for a DD...
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
copperrein In reply to StoryKillinger [2011-12-28 13:31:09 +0000 UTC]
Haters gonna hate, forever-alones gonna hate even more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StoryKillinger In reply to copperrein [2011-12-28 14:50:34 +0000 UTC]
Sense made= none fgdfs
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
UseR2006 In reply to StoryKillinger [2011-12-27 09:41:34 +0000 UTC]
average useless comment. dont see the need for it to be said.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
StoryKillinger In reply to UseR2006 [2012-01-05 13:50:20 +0000 UTC]
Sorry dude. I apologize for everything that i said... You are right there was no need for me to bad mouth your work. I apologize.
Its just i wanted to be heard. I know it was uncalled for...
Congratz on the DD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UseR2006 In reply to StoryKillinger [2012-01-24 16:02:38 +0000 UTC]
thats understandable, everyone wants to be heard but's how we go about it that defines who we are as a person. apology accepted.
and thanks for the grats
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
blaunagel In reply to UseR2006 [2011-12-27 23:01:19 +0000 UTC]
give him a break, although the model is very pretty and sexy, there isn't much to this photo. you made a very nasty crop there cutting off the base of the chair and her hair. tsk-tsk-tsk... not very professional of you. oh and by the way, i went to school for this so don't give me any "who are you to judge me" crap.
to further prove my point, not even the people who gave critique think this is very original. they just find her seemingly innocent face a very good contrast to the outfit.
i'd sum this photo up in: good choice of model and expression in an overly used suit and pose and unnecessary b&w technique. looks a bit like "good girl wondering what it's like to be bad" which would be even further pronounced as the highlight of the photo, had there been a better crop and nice subtle natural pink color on her face.
oh and if this photo was taken in b&w and this is the original crop, shame on you for pretending to be a good photographer.
i would have kept my mouth shut, if all the fetish fans out there hadn't attacked *Storykilla for no reason.
personally i think you have nothing to do with all that. it's deviantart that makes us envy eachother with these unjustified DDs while some other beautiful works go unnoticed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UseR2006 In reply to blaunagel [2011-12-28 14:39:05 +0000 UTC]
no offence but i will not give him a break, if someone doesn't like the photo that is fine, i have no need for everyone to like the image. I didn't ask for it to be featured, and i didn't force you or them to come and comment. I have no issue in recieving constructive crit, but what they said was in no way constructive and just a useless comment made to insult hence the original reply.
In regards to your post, DD's dont have to be deserved they dont even have to be any good, if you have even read the FAQ regarding DD's you would know this. it has ALWAYS been that way. FAQ #18: Who selects the Daily Deviation and how is it chosen? Also as ^quietchildae has said if you have issue with a DD being issued you should go through the proper channels which is ALSO in the FAQ. FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature?
Also i dont care if you went to school or otherwise, treating people with a little decency is something any human being should be capable of doing, i NEVER claimed it was a professional shot, nor did i EVER claim i was a professinal photographer. If i didn't think the people that submitted the critiques had valid points I would never have allowed them to have been posted.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
blaunagel In reply to UseR2006 [2012-01-02 15:59:10 +0000 UTC]
thanks for the links but frankly i wouldn't care to go through regular or any other channels because i don't believe anything can be changed for the better that way, or any way at all...
sorry if i offended you, i tried to keep it objective and to explain my and *Storykilla 's view in a simple way, because he is not very eloquent... at all, sometimes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nyx-Valentine In reply to StoryKillinger [2011-12-27 02:03:11 +0000 UTC]
How on earth is this possibly pornographic????
If you disagree with a featured DD, take it up with the community volunteer that featured it - the artist didn't choose for this to be featured, so why leave comments about it for them?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dreamlandtheories In reply to StoryKillinger [2011-12-26 22:18:49 +0000 UTC]
So even though she's by herself, sitting in a chair, looking at her boot, this is suddenly something pornographic just because she is wearing a latex outfit, that happens to cover her body, leaving nothing to be revealed except her face?
Your logic doesn't make sense. This is a glamour photo. It can't even be considered erotica.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
StoryKillinger In reply to dreamlandtheories [2011-12-27 01:15:50 +0000 UTC]
Excuse me ... But i was getting ahead of myself... With a quick judgment...
I was going to ask ... Why is this latex photo more worth of daily deviation then any other deviation... or any other latex deviation?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
UltimaMage578 In reply to dreamlandtheories [2011-12-26 23:29:15 +0000 UTC]
Don't bother. He must've never had worn latex, and I suspect that suit, along with those heels (I suspect they're designer due to the different shape) were bitches to get off. She is also very flexible.
But I'm just saying, he has a chance of being closed minded. I'm not saying he is. There is a chance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
StoryKillinger In reply to dreamlandtheories [2011-12-26 23:16:54 +0000 UTC]
im sorry but this is just an average photograph of a pretty girl wearing latex. Mostly seen on sluts
..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UseR2006 In reply to StoryKillinger [2011-12-28 14:48:34 +0000 UTC]
and if you dont care much for the image why comment on it then? what is gained by insulting the model and photographer? if you dont agree with the DD then why not go through the proper channels. FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature? I could stoop to your level and go trawl your gallery and bad mouth a few pieces but what would that achieve? NOTHING as your attempt has achieved here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
senseBOP In reply to ??? [2011-12-26 21:37:14 +0000 UTC]
I love the expression on her face. It's so natural and honest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UseR2006 In reply to senseBOP [2012-01-13 10:39:37 +0000 UTC]
thankyou i tried not to pose the model so much but rather give some slight directions on what i wanted the look to be like and then just chilled until she was more relaxed than posing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
senseBOP In reply to UseR2006 [2012-01-15 09:43:44 +0000 UTC]
Candid shots are always a favorite of mine. When I shoot I try to get the "person of interest" accustomed to the presence of my camera to the point that they're too tired to bother about it. That's when the best shots are made.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DasilvaGFX [2011-12-26 19:51:36 +0000 UTC]
Congrats! looks nice, but I would have cropped it in another way,also maybe more lights to get more reflection on the legs and the middle of her body...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UseR2006 In reply to DasilvaGFX [2012-01-13 10:38:36 +0000 UTC]
Thankyou for your feedback, It was my first time actually using studio lighting so having fun messing around with it. it's always good to get feedback about what could be better so thankyou
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
snowrite In reply to ??? [2011-12-26 18:19:44 +0000 UTC]
You know, the critique mentioned that the model's hair looks sleek near the roots but messy toward the bottom and that this could be fixed. In my opinion though, I think the messy hair adds a bit of contrast to the sleekness of the body suit, and doesn't need to be fixed at all.
Otherwise, I really, really enjoy this shot! It's framed quite nicely and I love the stark contrast of the shininess of the suit to the matte background. Bravissimo!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UseR2006 In reply to snowrite [2012-01-25 14:45:03 +0000 UTC]
Thankyou! love detailed comments like this. i can see why they mentioned about the hair but i agree i like the messyness of it rather than having it all slicked.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Auramancien In reply to ??? [2011-12-26 18:04:42 +0000 UTC]
This remind me "Theese boots are made for walking"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Allendra3 In reply to ??? [2011-12-26 18:02:05 +0000 UTC]
Those boots are so bad for your feet!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kagamin3Len In reply to ??? [2011-12-26 17:20:33 +0000 UTC]
What an amazing picture! I like how the model is looking at her shoes with a sort of: "hmm, what lovely boots" kind of look on her face! Sorry if that didn't make any sense
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UseR2006 In reply to kagamin3Len [2012-01-25 11:32:01 +0000 UTC]
lol thats why i gave it this title
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
UseR2006 In reply to MarioxPeach [2012-01-13 10:35:53 +0000 UTC]
lmao you can't, she could barely stand let alone run XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>