HOME | DD

w-oo-t — Punkin Pie

Published: 2012-11-30 19:54:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 43696; Favourites: 856; Downloads: 1008
Redirect to original
Description Here's something I drew this last February as I was dreaming up a group of girls based on feast type food items. Punkin Pie is the only one I've colored (the rest are still sketches). I guess I should have posted her before Thanksgiving. Anyways, I hope you think she's tasty.
Related content
Comments: 164

w-oo-t In reply to ??? [2012-12-01 21:10:32 +0000 UTC]

Pretty close. Cranberry is the biggest departure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheSoylentOrange In reply to w-oo-t [2012-12-01 21:20:00 +0000 UTC]

Really? What was Cranberry?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

w-oo-t In reply to TheSoylentOrange [2012-12-01 21:52:21 +0000 UTC]

Visual gag. Won't work if I explain it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheSoylentOrange In reply to w-oo-t [2012-12-01 22:03:41 +0000 UTC]

Okay.

...Show us next Thanksgiving? :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Icyshadowlord In reply to ??? [2012-11-30 19:59:20 +0000 UTC]

She looks tasty :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

w-oo-t In reply to Icyshadowlord [2012-11-30 20:32:33 +0000 UTC]

Yum! :9

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Icyshadowlord In reply to w-oo-t [2012-11-30 20:38:06 +0000 UTC]

c:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hongalabongala In reply to ??? [2012-11-30 19:56:31 +0000 UTC]

Ladies and gentlemen, this is what happens when you eat at burger king.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BioYuGi In reply to ??? [2012-11-30 19:56:18 +0000 UTC]

Okay, using whipped cream for nipples and hair would be expected, having her clothes be the crust is genius.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

w-oo-t In reply to BioYuGi [2012-11-30 20:39:42 +0000 UTC]

I think the reason I colored her and not any of the rest was because I liked her design (especially her crust bustier) so much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BioYuGi In reply to w-oo-t [2012-11-30 20:41:16 +0000 UTC]

Heh, when I first read this I thought you said "crust buster" and I thought she obtained some fighting special moves or something.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

w-oo-t In reply to BioYuGi [2012-11-30 20:50:36 +0000 UTC]

It could also mean that lacing it up so tight might result in a spectacular structural failure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BioYuGi In reply to w-oo-t [2012-11-30 20:52:07 +0000 UTC]

Haha, that would be something.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |