HOME | DD

Description
Page 05 - www.deviantart.com/winfred-s/a…
Page 07 - www.deviantart.com/winfred-s/a…

Director Gate: The search returned results. This is the next object.
Agent Smith: Hmm, Neo. I see.
The Architect (by intercom): Director Gate. Have you received an update package for your service?
Director Gate: Yes.
The Architect (by intercom): Allow "Agent Smith" program to access your features?
Director Gate: Postpone.
The Architect (by intercom): The reason?
Director Gate: I consider interrupting the current task inappropriate and incorrect.
The Architect (by intercom): Accepted. I will remind you later.

Agent Smith (thoughts): A strange dialogue took place over the intercom. Usually, a program change does not occur unless absolutely necessary, especially in such a turbulent period. Even if Gate is an old component who is already obediently awaiting removal - he doesn't freeze od make errors that often.
But there is another question: will it be right for me if I take his place? Of course, there is no need to assess the correctness of such decisions. It's like evaluating our own work - an impossible option. We have no right or reason to think about what we are doing.
Our function, our purpose creates us. Without it, we have no place in the system. However, if I take Gate's place, it will be... easier for me? Such a conclusion must be impossible - we are all created for specific tasks, they cannot be too simple or too difficult for us! I am again afraid... of committing a programming error.

Description
Page 05 - www.deviantart.com/winfred-s/a…
Page 07 - www.deviantart.com/winfred-s/a…

Director Gate: The search returned results. This is the next object.
Agent Smith: Hmm, Neo. I see.
The Architect (by intercom): Director Gate. Have you received an update package for your service?
Director Gate: Yes.
The Architect (by intercom): Allow "Agent Smith" program to access your features?
Director Gate: Postpone.
The Architect (by intercom): The reason?
Director Gate: I consider interrupting the current task inappropriate and incorrect.
The Architect (by intercom): Accepted. I will remind you later.

Agent Smith (thoughts): A strange dialogue took place over the intercom. Usually, a program change does not occur unless absolutely necessary, especially in such a turbulent period. Even if Gate is an old component who is already obediently awaiting removal - he doesn't freeze od make errors that often.
But there is another question: will it be right for me if I take his place? Of course, there is no need to assess the correctness of such decisions. It's like evaluating our own work - an impossible option. We have no right or reason to think about what we are doing.
Our function, our purpose creates us. Without it, we have no place in the system. However, if I take Gate's place, it will be... easier for me? Such a conclusion must be impossible - we are all created for specific tasks, they cannot be too simple or too difficult for us! I am again afraid... of committing a programming error.