HOME | DD

Published: 2012-12-19 23:13:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 6556; Favourites: 485; Downloads: 14
Redirect to original
Description
Watch out everyone, the computer/phone you are on right now is plotting how to kill you while you sleep.The american government will always make the attempt to alter the law even for ONE specified individual who screws up so badly he sets the nation in a panic. What's funny is that they don't actually tackle the real problem: they just want to look like they are.
People are just not going to stop disobeying the law by having another law issued or even changing a law. Don't blame objects and cause us people who want to protect and take care of our families to lose our own right to defend ourselves or hunt for food. You can make a spork do whatever you want, but it's not going to commit a crime by itself.
That's all I gotta say about this. Way too busy to make a more detailed description, but I think this explains itself just fine.
Related content
Comments: 68
Aq215 In reply to ??? [2012-12-20 05:14:26 +0000 UTC]
we are having an issue with that as well
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i-stamp [2012-12-20 00:04:08 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. After all, napalm/SAMs/RPGs/NBCRs/unregulated plastic explosives and WMD's doesn't kill people. People kill people. So any law-abiding citizen should be able to own them, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tepheris In reply to i-stamp [2012-12-20 00:57:14 +0000 UTC]
Well, if you go by the definition of "law-abiding citizens", it wouldn't hurt. But since such things aren't usually lawful for individuals to have, a law-abiding citizen wouldn't have them. It is overused but it's true, guns don't kill people, people kill people. And people kill people with guns regardless of whether or not it is legal to own guns.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
i-stamp In reply to Tepheris [2012-12-20 01:07:58 +0000 UTC]
Woops, thought this comment was in reply to the stamp I put up rather than this one. Ignore that 'this stamp'.
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i-stamp In reply to Tepheris [2012-12-20 01:01:31 +0000 UTC]
If guns weren't legal than 'law-abiding citizens' would still be calling for guns to be legal. That's the point. This stamp is saying that because napalm doesn't kill people, people kill people, then people should have access, legally, to any weapon they want. Up to and including napalm, plastic explosives, high yield bombs, military grade weapons of any and all kind. And because making them illegal won't stop criminals, why bother having them be illegal?
For that matter, if criminals are going to do what they want regardless of laws, why bother having laws at all?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tepheris In reply to i-stamp [2012-12-20 01:37:17 +0000 UTC]
You so colossally missed my point I dedicated a deviation to you. [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i-stamp In reply to Tepheris [2012-12-20 01:51:13 +0000 UTC]
No I didn't, it's just not a counter-point you want to hear.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tepheris In reply to i-stamp [2012-12-20 02:06:40 +0000 UTC]
No, i's a straw man argument. Well, if we're going to enforce laws the way you would want them, we might as well not have any,
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i-stamp In reply to Tepheris [2012-12-20 02:34:44 +0000 UTC]
What exactly is the 'way I would want them'? And not having laws is exactly what the gun proponents want with guns, so why would I want that? And how does this change that just because criminals do crime doesn't mean laws are without value?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tepheris In reply to i-stamp [2012-12-20 03:37:22 +0000 UTC]
This is just the impression that I get from looking at your deviations, but you seem exactly like the stereotypical liberal. Cristophobic, criminals are victims, America is the problem in the world, anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot, etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i-stamp In reply to Tepheris [2012-12-20 04:06:38 +0000 UTC]
I don't like Christianity, and I don't think America is number one, but I don't think either are the cause of the world's problems. And I don't think criminals are victims. And I don't think gun advocates are heros. And I think they use shitty arguments. Whether that makes them idiots or not is up to their reliance and their defense of those arguments.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
2wingo In reply to ??? [2012-12-19 23:40:29 +0000 UTC]
My favorite tactic for people who say that crap is to take out my gun, put it on the table and order it to kill that person. To date, it has never done anything more than just sit there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fatedart In reply to ??? [2012-12-19 23:36:24 +0000 UTC]
There are people out there who use their own bodies as weapons. Maybe we should ban bodies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Botboy41 In reply to ??? [2012-12-19 23:23:03 +0000 UTC]
This Kinda remidns me about a new story I heard a year ago i think, A Tazer Company was Sued because 1 Of there Tazer's Kill a criminal
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cyanea-Lamarckii In reply to ??? [2012-12-19 23:17:25 +0000 UTC]
I agree with you people are the ones how make the crime not weapons, weapons shall just be to protect and hunt for food. people are the ones who use them wrongly
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
N7-Commander In reply to ??? [2012-12-19 23:16:53 +0000 UTC]
I'd use a thousand times but I'm too fuckin' lazy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |