HOME | DD
xxNIKICHENxx — Spider-Gwen wip
[NSFW]
#bigbooty #bigbutt #blackandwhite #blackwhite #bodysuit #boobs #booty #female #girl #sexygirl #wip #gwenstacy #assbooty #spidergwen #buttbooty
Published: 2019-08-23 17:26:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 136746; Favourites: 3715; Downloads: 1205
Redirect to original
Description
Patreon Vkontakte YouTube ArtStation Pixiv Twitter FacebookCommission info.
Related content
Comments: 83
I’m perfectly fine with you believing that. lol, physical threats. What a fool.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not what I believe, it's a fact. You're a creep that induldges in the perversed depictions of minors. And the promise was a Boondocks reference, you one-dimensional, "age is just a number" neck ass hoe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dude, she is adult. When she accidentally killed Peter, it was at the Midtown pre-graduation party.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Find me a universe where 15 is an adult
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Was talking to the comic version. When she made her debut, it started 2 years after the prom night when she accidentally killed Peter. She was already graduated high school and her father urged to enter college.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And we're talking about the movie version, which is the version depicted in this drawing. What exactly is your point?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i thought it was the comic. I didn't see the movie
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It's still illegal to sexualize fictional characters that are under the age of consent.
theconversation.com/when-a-dra…
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Fictional characters cannot consent to having porn drawn of them period.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
But it's not okay if its a child. You're basically saying that child pornography is okay because it's a fictional character that can't consent.
You're fucked up in the head dude if you think that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you are looking at the Gwen artwork above and see a child, then maybe YOU need to get your head checked.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
She's 14
She is depicted in the movie as being a 14 year old child.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The movie isn’t the only depiction of Gwen Stacy (far from it).
Also, she’s at least 15 (possibly 16) in the movie. She specifically states that she’s 15 months older than Miles, who is 14. And she’s voiced by a 20-21 year old actress. Maybe you should spend your time defending actual people rather than fictional characters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I dont even know what you're trying to say. But that's still not better that she's 15. Also just because she's voiced by someone who is older doesn't mean the actual character isn't still a child.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
She’s might be 16, which her actual age is never confirmed in the movie. 16 is the age of consent in most states in the US. It’s not the legal age for porn, but it still proves that you were defending something while not knowing what you were talking about (which honestly should be embarrassing for you). The age of the voice actress should matter to you since the voice is the only real-life element of the movie character, and if the voice actress were 14, I’m sure porn of the character would be creepier to you. Unless you don’t care about that, which would mean that you care more about fiction than real life. Lastly, you conveniently ignored the fact that I stated that the movie version is not the only version of Gwen Stacey.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This art piece though is portraying a gwen stacy that is 15 months older than miles. Miles is only 14. Which means she is only fifteen. The only way she would be 16 is if miles was 14 and 9 months. Also they live in Brooklyn NY, and New York's age of consent is 17. So even if she was 16, she wouldn't be legal. I do care about real life which is why after this comment I'm going to stop replying because it'll become an endless argument. Her voice actor did a great job portraying her in the fact that she is 15. Also just search gwen stacy and see how different she is in movie compared the comics.
I'm not embarrassed which is why I continuously to defend my argument. But I'm done with this. It's just annoying at this point
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
How is 14 and 9 months not considered just being 14? “Oh no, I’m not 14, I’m 14 and 9 months”, who talks like that? You’re just being dishonest now. Oh, and and I see that you give complete control of your morals to the legal system. You’re basically saying: as long as it’s legal in my area, it’s ok. Laws can change. That isn’t a very consistent morality. That’s fine if you’re done talking. Have a nice day!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I agree with u guys zeal, but if character is made older it's different.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm pretty sure that even if the character is portrayed as being older it's still considered as being child pornography because the character was originally intended to be a child.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's like saying naked Arya Stark is child pornography because she started out as a child in the show.
Ur not making sense, characters grow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that's different. If the character grows up and the pornography is of them being an adult, then that's fine.
but if it's of them being a child, then that's not okay.
I'm just trying to explain that even though it portrayed through a digital median, child pornography is not okay and it never will be okay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
But ur looking at a grown up character now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That doesn't count. You cant just make the character older if they never get older in the movie/series they are in. If the character is 14 and doesn't get portrayed as getting older, then they will stay 14 until original creator makes them older. You cant make them older just you want to sexualize them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You are making up 'rules' out of the blue...
people can choose to portray a character at any age regardless if original creator did so himself or not...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm going off prior knowledge. But whatever. I've stopped caring about this comment thread. I'm not going to reply after this
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
you know u can draw ppl older than they rly are?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
that is one spectacular spider tush
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I would love a commission like this please let me know
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |