Dtxlife In reply to fatlovernumber99 [2017-07-24 07:22:01 +0000 UTC]

Looks like the point of his journal is that people were making the assumption that the art that was commissioned was sexual in nature. Doesn't matter if any of us can tell if he's asexual. That doesn't mean the art is sexual. I can't find anything to say he commissioned anything sexual at all. No nudity. No hentai. Just fat girls.

Hell we're even assuming that he's a guy... Maybe she's a fat girl that wants her favorite character to look like her. Who knows? Assumptions are stupid and making judgments are stupid. So who cares if no one knows this persons's asexual. Why does that make it okay to assume there's something sexual here?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fatlovernumber99 In reply to Dtxlife [2017-07-24 12:09:03 +0000 UTC]

Fat girls are some people's fetish, everything is sexual in a way because of the fact that there are literally infinite fetishes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dtxlife In reply to fatlovernumber99 [2017-07-24 21:04:35 +0000 UTC]

That's a pretty narrow-minded view. That'd be the equivalent of saying I derive sexual pleasure from arguing with you because hey I love debating with random people all over the place so obviously I'm only doing it because it's my sexual fetish. Regardless of what you think, the assumption of sexuality is in no way shape or form related to all human desires. Just because it's someone's fetish does not make it another person's. That's why there's the saying that when you assume you make an ass out of u and me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fatlovernumber99 In reply to Dtxlife [2017-07-25 00:37:29 +0000 UTC]

Just to let you know, I was thanking them for commissioning art for me to enjoy. The last part of my first comment was saying that most people just straight up do not give a fuck about people's sexuality. And my second comment was telling you that EVERYTHING IS HENTAI, and that you shouldn't be disgusted by the stuff actually classified as hentai, or say that shit isn't hentai. And they were commissioning fetish artists like plumpchu, so they were doing it so that the fat fetishists can enjoy it. oh and here is another point to add to my response, your previous comment is pretty narrow minded, because there are literally so many different people out there that you didn't even mention

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dtxlife In reply to fatlovernumber99 [2017-07-28 04:25:07 +0000 UTC]

*shrug* Thanking or not. Your second comment was a backhanded insult criticizing their journal. Why go through the trouble of doing that? To this person it wasn't meant to be sexual yet you along with others decided to take that and twist it to your own beliefs. Doesnt matter who the artist is. What matters is the spirit of the commission. I could commission an artist a particularly graphic sex scene and call it whatever the hell I want. And that's exactly what it would be. What I wanted from it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fatlovernumber99 In reply to Dtxlife [2017-07-28 14:43:57 +0000 UTC]

It was not meant to be an insult, I was just stating that no one would know if they were because of them commissioning fetish artists for pics, which is not a usual thing for asexual people to do...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dtxlife In reply to fatlovernumber99 [2017-07-29 20:37:31 +0000 UTC]

Still was an assumption. And when you assume you make and ass out of u and me. Doesn't matter what someone's motivations are or who they're commissioning. People are whatever they are and online they can say whatever they want to say. Dude commissioned zero nude scenes and zero sex scenes. That would be explicit evidence of a sexual nature. Fat chicks? *shrug* That's just fat chicks.

Also if what you said is true and it was of a sexual nature, then every single image is a violation of deviantart's ToS regardless of the content along with a metric ton of other weight gain images out there. So yeah... I'm gonna argue on the side that none of it was sexual because the alternative is having nothing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Azure-Wind In reply to TheTripleFool [2008-12-19 16:35:53 +0000 UTC]

No problem. The pic is great.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Azure-Wind In reply to hydek [2008-07-31 16:23:40 +0000 UTC]

No problem.
I might add more, but it still remains to be seen. ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1